Should preventive detention laws be used more judiciously, and what measures can be taken to ensure their proper implementation in accordance with constitutional principles?
The judiciary should be an independent and accountable body. Most importantly, an independent judiciary will be accountable to the society it serves as a pillar of democracy to ensure justice is given impartially. Multiple ways are there to achieve accountability. Judicial review empowers the judiciRead more
The judiciary should be an independent and accountable body. Most importantly, an independent judiciary will be accountable to the society it serves as a pillar of democracy to ensure justice is given impartially.
Multiple ways are there to achieve accountability. Judicial review empowers the judiciary to inspect the acts of executive and legislative powers, thus keeping these powers in adherence to the constitution. Public interest litigation is yet another statutory power for the citizenry of the nation. Citizens may seek justice in cases involving collective grievances through this mechanism. Its operation further enhances accountability and transparency. An important boost from outside comes from examination of the media. This could also be mechanisms like impeachment which provide a constitutional way of removing judges who have violated the code of conduct.
This would be so only until the possiblity of accountability is well placed with judicial independence. Too visible or too much outside interference would erode that subjective independence of the judiciary. The calibration must hold the judiciary accountable without compromising its fearless delivery of justice.
See less
Preventive detention laws should indeed be used more judiciously to balance security concerns with individual freedoms. These laws, designed to prevent individuals from committing potential crimes, can easily be misused, leading to violations of constitutional rights such as personal liberty and dueRead more
Preventive detention laws should indeed be used more judiciously to balance security concerns with individual freedoms. These laws, designed to prevent individuals from committing potential crimes, can easily be misused, leading to violations of constitutional rights such as personal liberty and due process. Over-reliance on preventive detention can result in the arbitrary detention of individuals without sufficient evidence, undermining the rule of law and public trust in the justice system. Therefore, it is essential to apply these laws with caution and only in cases where there is a clear, imminent threat to public safety.
To ensure the proper implementation of preventive detention laws in accordance with constitutional principles, several measures can be adopted. First, stringent judicial oversight is crucial, with courts regularly reviewing detention cases to prevent misuse. Establishing clear guidelines and standards for detention, including specific criteria for what constitutes an imminent threat, can help minimize arbitrary use. Additionally, ensuring detainees have access to legal representation and the right to appeal their detention can protect their rights. Transparency in the implementation of these laws, along with regular audits and public reporting, can further enhance accountability and adherence to constitutional norms.
See less