Sign Up

Have an account?

Sign In

Don't have account,

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.


Have an account?

Sorry, you do not have permission to ask a question, You must login to ask a question.

Need An Account,

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Search
Ask A Question

Judiciary

The Constitution of India establishes an independent judiciary, with the Supreme Court as the apex authority. The judiciary is responsible for interpreting the Constitution and safeguarding the fundamental rights of citizens.

The Supreme Court and the high courts of the states have the power of judicial review, allowing them to assess the constitutionality of laws and government actions. This robust judicial framework is a cornerstone of India’s democratic system.

Share
Followers
151 Answers
103 Questions
Home/Indian Polity/Judiciary

Mains Answer Writing Latest Questions

Prateek
  • 0
PrateekLearner
Asked: June 5, 2024In:
  • 0

What does the term “judicial activism” and “overreach” mean to you? Talk about the related issues as well. (Answer in 200 words)

upsc: judiciary
  1. Anmol _06
    Anmol _06 Begginer

    Judicial activism and overreach refer to the role and influence of the judiciary in shaping public policy and governance beyond its traditional boundaries. Judicial activism occurs when courts take an assertive role in interpreting the Constitution or laws to address societal issues or advance sociaRead more

    Judicial activism and overreach refer to the role and influence of the judiciary in shaping public policy and governance beyond its traditional boundaries. Judicial activism occurs when courts take an assertive role in interpreting the Constitution or laws to address societal issues or advance social justice, often stepping beyond the strict application of legal texts. This proactive approach aims to address perceived injustices or gaps in the law, reflecting an evolving interpretation of legal principles.

    Conversely, judicial overreach happens when the judiciary exceeds its authority, encroaching on areas typically reserved for the legislative or executive branches. This can lead to concerns about the balance of power, as courts may make decisions that significantly impact policy or administration, potentially undermining democratic processes or the separation of powers.

    Associated concerns

    • Erosion of Democratic Principles: When courts make decisions that influence policy, it can undermine the authority of elected representatives, potentially disrupting the democratic process and shifting power from legislatures and executives to the judiciary.
    • Imposition of Judicial Views: Judicial activism may lead to courts imposing their own interpretations or values on society, which can reflect personal or political biases rather than the intent of the law or public consensus.
    • Impact on Separation of Powers: Overreach by the judiciary can blur the lines between the branches of government, leading to conflicts over the scope of authority and responsibilities among the legislative, executive, and judicial branches.
    • Lack of Predictability and Stability: Frequent or inconsistent judicial decisions may create uncertainty in the legal system, making it difficult for individuals and institutions to anticipate legal outcomes and plan accordingly.
    • Potential for Policy Overstepping: Judicial decisions that effectively create or modify policy can circumvent the legislative process, where comprehensive debate and deliberation typically occur, potentially leading to less informed or less representative policy changes.
    See less
Ragini Sharma
  • 0
Ragini SharmaBegginer
Asked: September 17, 2024In:
  • 0

Benefits of Bicameral Legislation As in India we follow the Westministers model, which is a place situated in UK therefore alot many provisions have been adopted from UK’s constitution. In our constitution to understand Parliament we go to Art. ...

question
  1. Anita Dhruw
    Anita Dhruw Legend

    Constitution of India: Pros of bicameral legislation Parliamentary system of India has the provisions in the Constitution by having a two houses for the central legislature known as "Lok Sabha” which is House of people and the second chamber is “Rajya Sabha” which is the Council of States. This is sRead more

    Constitution of India: Pros of bicameral legislation

    Parliamentary system of India has the provisions in the Constitution by having a two houses for the central legislature known as “Lok Sabha” which is House of people and the second chamber is “Rajya Sabha” which is the Council of States. This is such a crucial factor in a democracy.

    The following is a highlight of benefits of Bicameral Legislation:

    1. Checks and Balances:
    This arrangements would make sure that there is a balance of power between the two houses that can never pass an undesirable legislation and encourages formulation of sound legislations.

    2. Representation of Diverse Interests:
    Lok Sabha: Leading the direct population, the party members were themselves elected by the people.
    – Rajya Sabha: It protects federal interest and defends the rights of the regional entities that are states and union territories in the country.

    3. Quality of Legislation:
    If there were two houses, people ensure the best scrutiny, debate and amendment of the proposed laws hence minimizing on errors made, and enhancing the quality of the laws to be made.

    4. Preventing Majoritarianism:
    It affords minority protection in the sense that it prevent the Lok Sabha dominance and ensures that the interest of the minority and small states are protected.

    5. Expert Opinion:
    The Rajya Sabha comprises of members nominated from the civil society who are selected depending on their contribution in literature, science and art, as well as social work. It also gives diversity in knowledge to the debates.

    6. Continuity in Governance:
    As a result of this, that Rajya Sabha is composed afresh through staggered elections, it continues to perform its legislative duties without interruption because the Lok Sabha has been dissolved.

    7. Safeguard Against Populism:
    The bicameral structure helps to level down populist pressures as the Rajya Sabha is more than a second chamber that allows for more measured responding to the public not being a direct representative of people’s votes.

    Conclusion
    India’s parbling, namely the double chambered structure of the Indian parliament is effective in contributing to a balanced much more inclusive and efficient course of democratic decision making. It caters to multiple needs and interests within the exercise of a rational and reasonable limit, thereby being a framework of Indian federal as well as a democratic state.

    See less
Ajay Sundar
  • 0
Ajay SundarLearner
Asked: February 18, 2025In:
  • 0

Roadmap for Answer Writing 1. Introduction Briefly introduce Public Interest Litigation (PIL) and its significance in the Indian judicial system. State its foundation in Articles 32 and 226 of the Indian Constitution. 2. Reasons for the Growth of Public Interest Litigation in India Judicial Activism Discuss ...

upsc: judiciary
  1. Team
    Team Supreme

    Model Answer Introduction Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has fundamentally reshaped the judicial system in India by empowering courts to champion the rights of marginalized communities. Rooted in Articles 32 and 226 of the Indian Constitution, PIL enables individuals or groups to file petitions inRead more

    Model Answer

    Introduction

    Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has fundamentally reshaped the judicial system in India by empowering courts to champion the rights of marginalized communities. Rooted in Articles 32 and 226 of the Indian Constitution, PIL enables individuals or groups to file petitions in the High Courts and Supreme Court on behalf of those whose rights are under threat, expanding judicial reach.

    Reasons for the Growth of Public Interest Litigation in India

    1. Judicial Activism: The Supreme Court, particularly under Chief Justice P.N. Bhagwati, expanded locus standi to empower disadvantaged groups to seek justice, marking a shift towards judicial activism. For example, the Hussainara Khatoon vs. State of Bihar (1979) case highlighted judicial activism in addressing the rights of undertrial prisoners .
    2. Protection of Marginalised Groups: PILs have played a vital role in safeguarding the rights of vulnerable populations and the environment, often stepping in where government actions have been inadequate. The Bandhua Mukti Morcha vs. Union of India (1984) case addressed the plight of bonded labourers, leading to significant social reforms .
    3. Simplified Access to Justice: By relaxing locus standi, PILs have enabled NGOs and activists to represent marginalized groups, ensuring that those who cannot approach the court directly have their issues addressed. The PUCL vs. Union of India (2001) case allowed NGOs to act on behalf of starving citizens, leading to the Right to Food campaign .
    4. Media Influence: The media has played a significant role in raising awareness about key PIL cases, shaping public opinion and influencing more litigations focused on public welfare. The Narmada Bachao Andolan case (2000) garnered massive media attention, raising awareness about dam displacement issues .
    5. Judicial Response to Executive Inaction: PILs have often been used as a tool to compel government action where the executive has fallen short of addressing critical public concerns. For instance, in the Vishaka vs. State of Rajasthan (1997) case, the Supreme Court established guidelines to prevent sexual harassment in the workplace, compelling the government to take action.

    Supreme Court Emerging as the World’s Most Powerful Judiciary

    The Indian Supreme Court has emerged as a powerful judiciary through its expansive interpretation of rights and intervention in governance. It has used PILs to broaden the interpretation of constitutional rights, influencing legislative domains. For example, in the MC Mehta vs. Union of India (1986) case, a PIL prompted the Supreme Court to broaden the interpretation of the right to a healthy environment under Article 21 . The court’s ability to intervene in policy-making and its broad judicial review powers have allowed it to examine the constitutionality of legislative and executive actions, giving it immense influence over national policies.

    Conclusion

    The innovative use of PIL has positioned the Indian Supreme Court as a powerful force for social justice and legal reform, addressing systemic issues and protecting the rights of marginalized communities. However, to maintain its efficacy, reforms to the PIL process must prioritize public interest while ensuring judicial balance.

    See less
Kuldeep Verma
  • 0
Kuldeep VermaBegginer
Asked: July 20, 2024In:
  • 0

  1. ranisingh9929
    ranisingh9929 Begginer

    Judges hold a unique and sensitive position in society, tasked with interpreting and applying the law impartially. Their credibility depends on public perception of their neutrality. When judges express personal opinions, especially on controversial issues, it can raise doubts about their impartialiRead more

    Judges hold a unique and sensitive position in society, tasked with interpreting and applying the law impartially. Their credibility depends on public perception of their neutrality. When judges express personal opinions, especially on controversial issues, it can raise doubts about their impartiality and erode public trust in the judiciary.

    Controversies have arisen when judges made politically charged or insensitive comments on social media or in public speeches. These incidents highlight the need for strict guidelines on judicial conduct. Many judicial systems have codes of conduct that restrict judges from making public statements that could compromise their perceived impartiality.

    However, some argue that judges, like other citizens, should have the right to free speech and that their insights can benefit public discourse. Overly strict restrictions could isolate judges from society and make them appear out of touch.

    Balancing these factors is crucial. Judges should be cautious about expressing personal opinions to maintain public trust, but they should not be entirely silenced. Clear guidelines can help judges share their expertise without compromising their impartiality.

    See less
RISHABH K
  • 0
RISHABH KBegginer
Asked: July 19, 2024In:
  • 0

Just need a short answer on how is new added BNSS affecting your everyday citizen.

judiciary
  1. Anmol Garg
    Anmol Garg Begginer

    The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), is a landmark legislation aimed at improving the criminal justice system in India. It introduces significant reforms to enhance citizen rights under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, making the legal processes more transparent, accessible aRead more

    The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), is a landmark legislation aimed at improving the criminal justice system in India. It introduces significant reforms to enhance citizen rights under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, making the legal processes more transparent, accessible and efficient.

    One of the key highlights of BNSS 2023 is the incorporation of modern technological advancements to facilitate easier access to justice. Provisions like e-FIRs in India and Zero FIR benefits are designed to eliminate the obstacles that have traditionally made filing complaints difficult. These measures are complemented by enhanced legal rights in BNSS 2023 that mandate the timely provision of FIR copies and regular notifications about case progress, thereby fostering greater transparency.

    However, BNSS has also increased the detention period from 15days to 90 days based on the offence. This could lead to abuse and torture of the detainee by the police.

    The BNSS aims to provide more transparency and faster remedial measures for both the accused and the victim. However, the prolonged effect on the citizens will be seen in 1-2 years following the enforcement of BNSS.

    See less
Srashti
  • 0
SrashtiBegginer
Asked: July 22, 2024In:
  • 0

What are the primary causes of the backlog of cases in the judiciary, and what steps can be taken to expedite the resolution of cases?

question
  1. Y Om Keerthi
    Y Om Keerthi Begginer

    The factors, mainly responsible for, arrears in the judiciary, are an inadequate judicial infrastructure, insufficient number of judges, procedural delays, and inflowing of frivolous litigation. Most courts have rudimentary and antiquated systems not adequately helped by technological support in casRead more

    The factors, mainly responsible for, arrears in the judiciary, are an inadequate judicial infrastructure, insufficient number of judges, procedural delays, and inflowing of frivolous litigation. Most courts have rudimentary and antiquated systems not adequately helped by technological support in case management and tracking. On the other hand, the judge-to-population ratio in many regions is very low, which burdens each judge with a huge caseload. Other contributory factors that really slow down the process are procedural delays, inclusive of long adjournments and complicated procedural requirements. Apart from this, frivolous and unnecessary litigation adds to the burden and saps the system of its time and energy that should have otherwise been devoted to other more urgent cases.

    Case disposal can be speeded up by several measures: first, by increasing the number of judges and improving judicial infrastructure. In this, the use of technology in facilitating e-filing and electronic case management, as well as virtual hearings, will greatly reduce inordinate delays. Simplification of procedural laws and checking unwarranted adjournments will make the case process smooth. ADR methods, like mediation and arbitration, can be initiated and prompted for the settlement of disputes outside the mainstream courts. Stringent penalties for frivolous litigation will dissuade such cases from entering the mainstream. Only comprehensive judicial reforms aimed at making the system efficient and modern will really help in tackling the problem of arrears effectively and providing timely justice to the people.

    See less
Ritika Sharma.1
  • 0
Ritika Sharma.1Begginer
Asked: July 21, 2024In:

CPC

  • 0

A publishes a series of books under the title ― The Oxford and Cambridge Publications ― to induce the belief that the books are publications of the Oxford and Cambridge Universities or either of them. The two Universities join as ...

cpcjudiciarylawquestion
  1. Anita Dhruw
    Anita Dhruw Legend

    Based on the concept of “order of joining the parties”, under Order I, Rule 1 of CPC under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 of India, whether two more people can appear and approach a single court in a single suit. Legal provisions: The 'Order I, Rule 1 CPC, mentions that: Any number of individuals can beRead more

    Based on the concept of “order of joining the parties”, under Order I, Rule 1 of CPC under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 of India, whether two more people can appear and approach a single court in a single suit.

    Legal provisions:

    The ‘Order I, Rule 1 CPC, mentions that: Any number of individuals can be brought together as claimants in a single action where —
    or (a) any right to relief arises out of the same act or transaction or series of acts or transactions; and
    It might do so (b)-(b) if such persons brought separate suits, any common question of law or fact would arise.

    Application to the Case
    1. Common Right to Relief:
    Both Universities have the same complaint against A because when A employed the title “The Oxford and Cambridge Publications” people are led to assume that the books are published by the said Universities. This confers on both plaintiffs a ‘common right to relief’ in preventing A from employing the misleading title.

    2. Same Act or Transaction:
    Even a single transaction involved in the act of publication of books under the misleading title is abusive of th goodwill and reputation of both the Universities.These are common issues which if the Universities had filed separate suits they would have been raised as follows: more people can join and move before a single court in a singular lawsuit.

    Legal provisions:

    The ‘Order I, Rule 1 CPC, mentions that: “All persons may be joined as plaintiffs in one suit where —
    (a) any right to relief arises out of the same act or transaction or series of acts or transactions; and
    (b) if such persons brought separate suits, any common question of law or fact would arise.”

    Application to the Case
    1. Common Right to Relief:
    The two Universities have a common grievance against A, because A’s use of the title “The Oxford and Cambridge Publications” gives rise to the belief that the books are published by either or both institutions. This gives both plaintiffs a ‘common right to relief’ in restraining A from using the misleading title.

    2. Same Act or Transaction:
    The act of publication of books under the misleading title itself is a ‘single transaction’ that infringes goodwill and reputation of both the Universities.

    3. Common Questions of Law and Fact: If separate suits were filed by the Universities, they would have common issues such as: Whether A’s use of the title is deceptive.
    – Whether it violates the rights of the Universities.
    The area affected by the calamity as well as the degree or intensity of the identified loss.

    Joining an action has the advantage of avoiding the parallel trials which are time consuming and therefore saver judicial resources.

    Conclusion
    Oxford and Cambridge Universities can join in filing the suit under the CPC because their rights to relief arise out of the same transaction and if separate actions were filed, there would be common question of law and fact. Pleading as plaintiffs is not a wrong approach to the procedures laid down in the present case.

    See less
ANAGHA S
  • 0
ANAGHA SBegginer
Asked: July 19, 2024In: , , , , , ,
  • 0

“What are the implications of a Uniform Civil Code in India in relation to Shariah and Hindu law, and how can legal reforms balance religious diversity with the pursuit of gender equality and social justice?”

question
  1. Medhini Prabhakar
    Medhini Prabhakar Begginer

    "It is a regret that Article 44 has remained a dead letter" said Justice Y V Chandrachud in Shah Bano judgement (1985).  Our constitution-makers have placed 'Uniform Civil Code(Article 44)' under Directive principles of State Policy(Part IV). Need for UCC to balance diversity and ensure social justiRead more

    “It is a regret that Article 44 has remained a dead letter” said Justice Y V Chandrachud in Shah Bano judgement (1985).  Our constitution-makers have placed ‘Uniform Civil Code(Article 44)’ under Directive principles of State Policy(Part IV).

    Need for UCC to balance diversity and ensure social justice 
    1) It enhances ‘Secularism’ – mentioned in Preamble and a part of Basic structure.
    2) It is based on ‘Equality’ – a fundamental right (Article 14)
    3) Personal laws are usually against women and marginal, vulnerable sections.
    For example,  Shariat – allows polygamy (Sarala Mudgal Case)
    5) States like Goa, Uttarkhand have adopted UCC after legislative consensus
    6) Supreme Court has supported its implementation in multiple instances.

    Challenges to implement UCC
    1. Article 26 provides for the right to manage one’s own religious matters.
    2. Debate of – Fundamental Rights(Article 26) v/s DPSPs(Article 44)
    3. STs have customary laws protected by the constitution itself.
    4. Apprehensions of imposition of majoritarian values on minority
    5. Accommodating diversity

    Way forward
    1) 22nd Law commission sought public consultation process on UCC
    2) Consensus building that UCC is necessary
    3) In the short-term personal laws can be codified phase-wise
    4) UCC should not be imposed right away through an ordinance, it should pass through parliamentary debates and deliberations
    5) Political parties should rise above differences for the common good of all

    A fundamental change in people’s mindset is required for UCC’s implementation.

    See less
Ashima Agarwal
  • 0
Ashima AgarwalBegginer
Asked: July 19, 2024In: ,
  • 0

question
  1. RISHABH K
    RISHABH K Begginer

    In India, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods such as arbitration, mediation, conciliation, Lok Adalats, negotiation, and settlement through ombudsman offer effective means to settle disputes outside the traditional court system. These methods are increasingly recommended by courts to allevRead more

    In India, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods such as arbitration, mediation, conciliation, Lok Adalats, negotiation, and settlement through ombudsman offer effective means to settle disputes outside the traditional court system. These methods are increasingly recommended by courts to alleviate the heavy backlog of cases, ensuring a more efficient judicial process. ADR mechanisms provide quicker resolutions compared to lengthy litigation, and are generally more cost-effective, making them accessible to a broader population. Additionally, ADR processes maintain confidentiality, protecting sensitive information, and often help preserve personal and business relationships through collaborative, non-adversarial approaches. The flexibility of ADR procedures, tailored to the specific needs of the parties involved, further enhances their appeal. Consequently, courts advocate for ADR to foster timely, amicable, and less costly dispute resolutions.

    See less
Anonymous
  • 0
Poll
Anonymous
Asked: July 13, 2024In: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
  • 0

A positive mindset helps aspirants: Stay motivated and focused on their goals Approach challenges and obstacles with a problem-solving attitude To be an aspirants:- Maintain a healthy work-life balance and avoid burnout. Develop resilience and bounce back from failures or setbacks. Cultivate ...

  1. Akshita Singh
    Akshita Singh Begginer

    Uncertain about the Exam System and Curriculum: Get to know examination pattern and syllabus including preliminary, mains, and interview levels. Know in detail what each subject and stage entails. Develop a Study Schedule: Create a reasonable duration for all subjects which should involve time for rRead more

    Uncertain about the Exam System and Curriculum: Get to know examination pattern and syllabus including preliminary, mains, and interview levels. Know in detail what each subject and stage entails.

    Develop a Study Schedule: Create a reasonable duration for all subjects which should involve time for revision as well as practice. Come up with your daily, weekly, and monthly goals. Read Books and Materials Prescribed by Board: Follow recommended books related to each subject among standard textbooks. Current affairs magazines and online resources enhance your reading materials.

    Keep Track of Current Affairs:

    Go through newspapers on a regular basis while also following reliable news sources.

    What happened during these events? What do they mean for the exam course?

    Take Notes Regularly While Also Revising Often: Prepare short notes for each topic using minimum words possible.

    Regular review is very important in remembering things better as well as understanding them deeply

    Practice Writing Skills: To improve your answer writing skills solve previous year’s papers & take mock tests on it. Concentrate on being clear, having good structure, expressing oneself properly

    Join Coaching or Online Courses (if needed): Consider joining coaching classes or taking online courses to be guided in an organized manner.Engage yourself into group discussions with fellow mates.

    See less
Load More Questions

Resources & Suggestions

Mains Answer Writing Latest Articles

On: April 18, 2025

Daily Answer Writing Practice Questions (18 April 2025)

Do you agree with the claim that indecision and risk aversion are prevalent issues in Indian bureaucracy? Support your answer with logical reasoning. (150 words) ऐसा कहा जाता है कि भारतीय नौकरशाही में अनिर्णय और जोखिम से बचने की प्रवृत्ति ...

On: April 18, 2025 Comments: 0

Strengthening India’s Cyber Defence

Rising Threats Digital Era Challenges: 2024 marks a significant rise in digital threats, particularly from AI and cyberattacks. Key Issues: Disinformation campaigns. Cyber fraud affecting daily life. Current Major Cyber Threats Ransomware Rampage: Over 48,000 instances of WannaCry ransomware detected ...

On: April 18, 2025 Comments: 0

भारत की साइबर सुरक्षा

बढ़ते खतरे कृत्रिम बुद्धिमत्ता (AI) और साइबर हमले: 2024 में AI और साइबर हमलों के खतरे में वृद्धि। महत्वपूर्ण अवसंरचना पर हमले: डिजिटल हमलों और दुष्प्रचार अभियानों की संभावना बढ़ी है। प्रमुख साइबर खतरें रैनसमवेयर का प्रकोप: 48,000 से अधिक ...

Explore Our Blog