Answer the question in maximum 50 words/5 to 6 lines. This question carries 05 marks. [MPPSC 2023] What reasons are there for criticizing the Constituent Assembly?
Model Answer Introduction The Government of India Act, 1935, was a significant step towards India's self-governance under British colonial rule. It laid down several provisions that were later incorporated into India’s Constitution after independence. Sir Ivor Jennings even referred to the Indian CoRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
The Government of India Act, 1935, was a significant step towards India’s self-governance under British colonial rule. It laid down several provisions that were later incorporated into India’s Constitution after independence. Sir Ivor Jennings even referred to the Indian Constitution as a “Carbon Copy of the 1935 Act,” highlighting its influence on the post-independence legal and constitutional framework.
Influence of the Government of India Act, 1935 on India’s Post-Independence Constitutional Framework:
- Federal Structure: The 1935 Act introduced a federal structure with a clear division of powers between the center and the provinces. This concept of federalism was carried forward into the Indian Constitution, which also divides powers between the Union and States.
- Directive Principles of State Policy: The Act included an “Instrument of Instructions” for the Governor-General, which emphasized public welfare, social justice, and economic development. This inspired the inclusion of the Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP) in the Indian Constitution, guiding the government in achieving social and economic justice.
- Division of Powers: The Act classified subjects into three lists: federal, provincial, and concurrent, a structure that was replicated in India’s Constitution under the Seventh Schedule to manage the division of responsibilities between different levels of government.
- Bicameral Legislature: A bicameral legislature was introduced at both the central and provincial levels, a concept that influenced the design of India’s Parliament, consisting of the Lok Sabha (Lower House) and Rajya Sabha (Upper House).
- Judiciary: The Act established the Federal Court, which was later replaced by the Supreme Court of India, maintaining the need for an independent judiciary.
- Public Service Commission: The establishment of a Federal Public Service Commission set a precedent for the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) in post-independence India.
- Emergency Provisions: The 1935 Act included provisions for handling emergencies, which were adopted in India’s Constitution under Articles 352 to 360, ensuring a legal framework for national emergencies.
Points of Differences
- Dominion Status vs. Sovereignty: The 1935 Act envisioned India as a dominion under British sovereignty, whereas the post-independence Constitution declared India as a sovereign republic.
- Provincial Autonomy: The 1935 Act retained significant central control, whereas the Indian Constitution provided greater autonomy to the states.
- Representation: The Act offered limited Indian representation, while the Indian Constitution introduced universal adult suffrage, ensuring broader democratic participation.
- Socio-Economic Reforms: The 1935 Act lacked provisions for critical socio-economic reforms such as the abolition of untouchability, a key feature of India’s Constitution.
- Role of Governor-General: The Act conferred substantial powers to the Governor-General, whereas in independent India, the President’s role became largely ceremonial and symbolic.
Conclusion
As Dr. B.R. Ambedkar noted, borrowing ideas from existing frameworks is not plagiarism but a method of learning and building upon them. While the Government of India Act, 1935, profoundly shaped the Indian Constitution, the latter remains a transformative document that reflects India’s unique aspirations for a just, democratic, and sovereign nation.
See less
Grounds of Criticism of the Constituent Assembly The Constituent Assembly of India, which drafted the Indian Constitution, is a significant body in the history of Indian democracy. Despite its pivotal role in shaping the nation's constitutional framework, it has faced various criticisms over the yeaRead more
Grounds of Criticism of the Constituent Assembly
The Constituent Assembly of India, which drafted the Indian Constitution, is a significant body in the history of Indian democracy. Despite its pivotal role in shaping the nation’s constitutional framework, it has faced various criticisms over the years. These criticisms are rooted in both procedural and substantive aspects of its functioning and decisions.
1. Representation and Inclusiveness:
2. Lack of Transparency and Public Participation:
3. Decisions on Key Issues and Compromises:
4. Representation of Women and Minorities:
5. Context of Political Instability:
Conclusion:
The Constituent Assembly of India played a crucial role in drafting the Constitution, but it has faced criticism on several grounds. These include issues related to representation and inclusiveness, transparency and public participation, and the context of its decisions amidst political instability. While the Assembly laid the foundation for democratic governance and legal frameworks, the criticisms highlight areas for reflection and improvement in the context of inclusive and transparent democratic processes. The evolution of democratic practices and public engagement mechanisms in contemporary India reflects ongoing efforts to address these historical criticisms and enhance governance.
See less