As per the National Family Health Survey-5, India's Total Fertility Rate (TFR) has declined from 2.2 in 2015-16 to 2.0 in 2019-21. With falling fertility, rising median age (from 24 years in 2011 to 29 years currently which is expected to be 36 years by 2036), and a falling dependency ratio (expecteRead more
As per the National Family Health Survey-5, India’s Total Fertility Rate (TFR) has declined from 2.2 in 2015-16 to 2.0 in 2019-21. With falling fertility, rising median age (from 24 years in 2011 to 29 years currently which is expected to be 36 years by 2036), and a falling dependency ratio (expected to decrease from 65% to 54% in the coming decade), India is in the middle of a demographic transition. With this, India will have a nano demographic window in the two decades of 2020 to 2040, to achieve the socio-economic objectives as follows:
- Human capital formation: Increased investment in health, education, and skills for the younger population, as fewer resources are needed to be diverted for dependent populations ie. children and elderly. Thus, it will help in plugging income inequality through better job opportunities.
- Higher per capita: Low fertility scenario supports higher income per capita, higher capital stock per worker, and a lower unemployment rate, which will boost the GDP. These will help in achieving the goals of zero hunger and poverty.
- Increased labour force participation: A shift in the age structure of the population towards the working-age group will increase the potential labour supply. In addition, lower fertility induces more female participation in the labour market. It will help in achieving inclusive growth and socio-economic parity.
However, without adequate policies, the nano demographic window may lead to rising unemployment, thereby fuelling economic and social risks. Further, with the passage of time, the share of the older population will rise and that of the working age population will begin to fall. To address these challenges and to gain from the nano demographic window, India needs to take various measures, such as:
- Improving consumption patterns: Consumption imbalance between children and adults needs to be addressed by increasing investment in terms of nutrition and learning during early childhood to create a strong foundation for human capital.
- As per the National Transfer Accounts (NTAs), a child in India consumes around 60% of the consumption by an adult aged between 20 and 64, while a child in China consumes about 85% of a prime-age adult’s consumption.
- Investment in education and healthcare: Public spending on health has remained flat at around 1% of GDP. It needs to be improved, particularly in states whose demographic window of opportunity is still more than a decade away, like Uttar Pradesh and Bihar.
- Allocation based on the latest population census: There should be devolution of more funds to states with a higher working population in order to nurture more human capital.
- Transition in skilling: There should be greater focus on transitioning from secondary education to universal skilling and entrepreneurship. Also, upgrading skills in terms of emerging technologies like Artificial Intelligence helps get the Indian workforce ready to enter the 4th Industrial Revolution.
- Increasing share of women workforce: As of 2019, 20.3% of women were working or looking for work, down from 34.1% in 2003-04. This has to be increased through tax incentives and other measures like gender budgeting.
- Creating employment opportunities: Providing incentives to start-ups and large manufacturing industries through schemes like Make in India, Stand-Up India, and Start-Up India will help to provide employment to the available workforce.
Such comprehensive measures will help India not only to capitalise on the nano demographic window for becoming a developed country, but also to lay a solid foundation for the generation that will enter the demographic divided window.
See less
The Phrase that "Discrimination is in our blood" readily implies that it is something hard-wired in human nature. Although this is true to a great extent—that humans have the tendency to organize, segregate information, and thus, differentiate on the basis of various attributes like race, gender, agRead more
The Phrase that “Discrimination is in our blood” readily implies that it is something hard-wired in human nature. Although this is true to a great extent—that humans have the tendency to organize, segregate information, and thus, differentiate on the basis of various attributes like race, gender, age, and so on—it is also important to know how to differentiate natural propensity from socially constructed behaviors.
Psychologically and sociologically:
1. Evolutionary Psychology: Some argue that humans were evolutionarily programmed to quickly put people into categories as a human survival mechanism. This provided the early humans with the ability to rapidly see who was friend and who was foe. It may have created an evolutionary predisposition toward those who are like us and distrust of those who are different.
2. Socialization: Much of what we view as discriminatory behavior we learn through socialization. Family, media, peers, and institutions were those who taught us the norms, values, and biases. These learned behaviors can turn out to reinstate and perpetuate discrimination.
3. Cultural Context: Discrimination varies a lot from one culture to another and throughout history. What in one context is perceived to be discriminative might not be so in another, hence it suggests that much of this behavior is culturally determined as opposed to being biologically disposed.
4. Malleability: Human behavior is very easily modifiable. Whereas we might have some hard-wired tendencies, we are also capable of empathy, insight, and change. Education, awareness, and policy have an enormous potential for reducing discriminatory behaviors.
5. Moral and Ethical Responsibility: Notwithstanding any natural tendency, we have the moral and ethical responsibility to struggle for equality and justice. Inequities and biased behaviors are recognized and challenged as a part of building a society that is fairer and more inclusive.
Somehow, while the roots of in-group favoritism may be partially related to evolutionary factors, discrimination in the form it occurs today is essentially of social and cultural origin. This means that it is also within our powers to change with education, policy, and personal responsibility.
See less