Roadmap for Answer Writing 1. Introduction Key Points: Briefly mention the issue of frequent transfers in India’s civil services, especially the IAS. Provide the context: average tenure of an IAS officer (15-18 months). Objective: Set the stage for discussing its negative impacts and the need ...
Model Answer The concept of the "steel frame" of governance in India, envisioned by the framers of the Constitution, underscores the need for an impartial, efficient, and non-partisan bureaucracy. However, the politicization of civil services erodes this foundation and disrupts the essential role ofRead more
Model Answer
The concept of the “steel frame” of governance in India, envisioned by the framers of the Constitution, underscores the need for an impartial, efficient, and non-partisan bureaucracy. However, the politicization of civil services erodes this foundation and disrupts the essential role of the civil services in ensuring stable and transparent governance.
Loss of Neutrality and Integrity: Politicization often compels civil servants to make decisions that align with political goals rather than the public interest. For instance, in the 2G spectrum case, bureaucrats from the Telecom Ministry compromised their neutrality, leading to significant governance failures. This undermines the very essence of civil services, which is to serve the nation impartially.
Widespread Corruption: Political interference increases the likelihood of corrupt practices within the bureaucracy. According to the Global Corruption Barometer-Asia (2020), India has one of the highest bribery rates in Asia, with 39% of respondents indicating that bribery is widespread, and 46% citing the prevalence of personal connections for bureaucratic deals. Such corruption erodes trust in the administration and hampers development.
Impact on Morale and Policy Continuity: Political interference in transfers and appointments demoralizes civil servants. The frequent transfer of IAS officer Ashok Khemka, who has been moved 56 times in a 30-year career, exemplifies how political pressures disrupt bureaucratic stability. Additionally, mass bureaucratic reshuffles after new government formations lead to discontinuity in policy implementation, further impeding long-term governance objectives.
Steps to Mitigate the Impact of Politicization
Transparent Appointments: Ensuring that civil service appointments and promotions are based on merit, with transparent criteria, can help mitigate political influence. The Prakash Singh judgment (2006) recommended setting up independent bodies like State Security Commissions to oversee appointments in the police, and similar mechanisms can be applied to other services.
Post-Retirement Neutral Period: To prevent the revolving door between politics and bureaucracy, the Hota Committee recommended a two-year cooling-off period before civil servants take up post-retirement political positions, such as becoming Governors.
Strengthening Accountability and Training: The Second Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) emphasized the importance of defining public service values by law, holding bureaucrats accountable for ethical lapses. Moreover, regular training can reinforce neutrality and ethical conduct among civil servants, enabling them to withstand political pressures effectively.
In conclusion, reinforcing a non-partisan, neutral, and efficient bureaucracy through reforms in appointments, accountability, and training can help restore the integrity of the “steel frame” of governance in India.
See less
Model Answer Introduction Frequent transfers of civil servants, especially within the Indian Administrative Service (IAS), are a longstanding issue. The average tenure of IAS officers in a posting is only 15-18 months, which significantly impacts the functioning of the administration. Negative ImpacRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
Frequent transfers of civil servants, especially within the Indian Administrative Service (IAS), are a longstanding issue. The average tenure of IAS officers in a posting is only 15-18 months, which significantly impacts the functioning of the administration.
Negative Impacts of Frequent Transfers
Poor Governance:
Frequent transfers hinder the accumulation of knowledge and experience in a particular area. Officers are unable to effectively implement policies or see the results of their work, leading to a decline in governance quality. As the Hota Committee (2004) noted, the absence of a fixed tenure is a major reason behind the poor implementation of government policies.
Corruption:
Frequent transfers also foster corruption. As per the Hota Committee, these transfers create opportunities for officers to form a nexus with politicians to secure favorable postings, undermining accountability.
Erosion of Political Neutrality:
The Second Administrative Reforms Commission (2nd ARC) observed that ministers focus more on administrative matters like transfers rather than on policymaking. This shift affects the political neutrality of the civil services, an essential characteristic for impartial governance.
Tool for Harassment:
Honest officers view frequent transfers as a form of harassment and coercion. This not only demotivates them but also affects the fairness of the bureaucratic system.
Suggested Reforms
Fixed Minimum Tenure:
A minimum tenure of 3-5 years for officers in a posting would ensure stability, continuity, and better policy implementation. This will also allow civil servants to demonstrate the results of their work over time.
Transparency in Transfers:
Transfer policies should be based on performance and experience, not on arbitrary or politically motivated reasons. This would reduce the potential for corruption and ensure fairness.
Establishment of an Independent Body:
The Supreme Court, in the TSR Subramanian case (2013), recommended the formation of a Civil Services Board (CSB) under Article 309 to oversee transfers. While the 2014 amendment to the IAS (Cadre) Rules, 1954 provided for a CSB, its implementation has been inconsistent, with several states failing to set it up.
Conclusion
Frequent transfers undermine the efficiency of civil servants. Implementing fixed tenures, ensuring transparency, and establishing an independent body for oversight can address these issues and lead to a more stable and effective bureaucracy.
See less