Sign Up

Have an account?

Sign In

Don't have account,

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.


Have an account?

Sorry, you do not have permission to ask a question, You must login to ask a question.

Need An Account,

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Search
Ask A Question

Citizen Charter, transparency, accountability & other aspects

Citizen charters outline the standards of service that public agencies commit to provide to citizens. Transparency ensures open access to government information and decision-making processes.

Accountability mechanisms hold public officials responsible for their actions and decisions. Other key governance aspects include e-governance, grievance redressal, audit systems, and participatory decision-making.

Share
Followers
90 Answers
61 Questions
Home/Governance/Citizen Charter, transparency, accountability & other aspects/Page 2

Mains Answer Writing Latest Questions

Prince Kumar
  • 0
Prince KumarBegginer
Asked: August 5, 2024In:
  • 0

Discuss the role of the Citizen Charter in enhancing governance. In your response, critically analyze how transparency and accountability, as enshrined in the Citizen Charter, contribute to effective public administration. Additionally, evaluate other key aspects that influence the successful implementation ...

  1. Akriti Pandey
    Akriti Pandey Enthusiast
Team
  • 0
TeamSupreme
Asked: August 20, 2024In:
  • 0

Roadmap for Answer Writing 1. Introduction Define the Citizens’ Charter and its purpose in promoting transparency and accountability. Mention the year of introduction (1997) and its significance in public service delivery. 2. Limitations of the Citizens’ Charter Lack of Awareness: Discuss the general public’s unfamiliarity with ...

upsc: citizen charter transparency accountability and other aspects
  1. Team
    Best Answer
    Team Supreme

    Model Answer Introduction The Citizens' Charter, introduced in India in 1997, aims to enhance the quality of public services, promote transparency, and ensure accountability. Despite its potential as a vital instrument for organizational transparency, several limitations hinder its effectiveness. LiRead more

    Model Answer

    Introduction

    The Citizens’ Charter, introduced in India in 1997, aims to enhance the quality of public services, promote transparency, and ensure accountability. Despite its potential as a vital instrument for organizational transparency, several limitations hinder its effectiveness.

    Limitations of the Citizens’ Charter

    1. Lack of Awareness

    Many citizens remain unaware of the commitments and grievance redressal mechanisms outlined in the Charter. For instance, while the Passport Seva Kendras have improved service delivery, public knowledge about the Charter’s provisions is still limited.

    2. Bureaucratic Resistance

    Implementation challenges often arise from bureaucratic resistance. The Indian Railways’ Citizens’ Charter has faced such issues, leading to delays and non-adherence to commitments.

    3. Inadequate Monitoring and Evaluation

    A weak monitoring and evaluation framework limits the effectiveness of the Citizens’ Charter. For example, the Municipal Corporation of Delhi’s Charter lacks a robust system to assess performance against commitments.

    4. Generic Charters

    Some Citizens’ Charters, like that of the Department of Posts, are criticized for being too generic, failing to provide specific service standards or time-bound commitments.

    5. Limited Participation

    The Citizens’ Charter of the National Health Mission has been criticized for not involving local communities and healthcare providers in its preparation, leading to a disconnect between the Charter and the needs of citizens.

    Measures for Greater Effectiveness

    1. Awareness Campaigns: Conduct widespread awareness initiatives using various communication channels to inform citizens about the Citizens’ Charter and its benefits.
    2. Cultural Shift in Bureaucracy: Foster accountability within the bureaucracy and offer incentives for adherence to the Citizens’ Charter commitments.
    3. Robust Monitoring Mechanisms: Establish strong monitoring and evaluation systems to assess service performance and drive continuous improvement.
    4. Specific Commitments: Ensure that the Citizens’ Charter includes specific, measurable, and time-bound commitments to enhance accountability.
    5. Community Involvement: Involve citizens and civil society organizations in the preparation and implementation of the Citizens’ Charter to ensure it meets the realities and needs of the community.

    Conclusion

    By addressing these limitations and implementing the suggested measures, India can unlock the full potential of the Citizens’ Charter, leading to improved governance and a more empowered citizenry.

    See less
Reena Bhatt
  • 0
Reena BhattBegginer
Asked: August 20, 2024In:
  • 0

Roadmap for Answer Writing Introduction Define the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) and its significance in the Indian parliamentary system. State the objective: to discuss the role of the PAC in establishing government accountability to the people. Historical Background Provide a brief history of the PAC’s ...

upsc: citizen charter transparency accountability and other aspects
  1. Team
    Best Answer
    Team Supreme

    Model Answer Introduction The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) is a vital parliamentary committee in India that ensures the government’s financial accountability to the people. Its primary responsibility is to examine the annual audit reports of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG), whiRead more

    Model Answer

    Introduction

    The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) is a vital parliamentary committee in India that ensures the government’s financial accountability to the people. Its primary responsibility is to examine the annual audit reports of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG), which scrutinizes the appropriation and utilization of funds granted by Parliament.

    Examination of Accounts

    The PAC plays a crucial role in examining government accounts, scrutinizing how public funds have been allocated and spent. By ensuring expenditures align with the approved budget, the PAC holds the government accountable for its financial decisions. This process is essential for maintaining fiscal discipline and responsible governance.

    Investigation of Financial Irregularities

    The PAC investigates financial irregularities and mismanagement highlighted in the CAG’s reports. It identifies responsible parties for these lapses and recommends corrective measures, thus promoting transparency. By addressing issues of corruption and inefficiency, the PAC plays a pivotal role in safeguarding public resources.

    Recommendations for Improvements

    After analyzing the CAG’s findings, the PAC provides recommendations aimed at enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of public spending. These recommendations can lead to significant reforms in financial management, contributing to better governance.

    Non-Partisan Nature

    The PAC is composed of members from both the ruling party and the opposition, ensuring a non-partisan approach to its work. This diverse composition facilitates objective scrutiny of government actions, enabling the committee to focus on accountability without political bias.

    Reporting to Parliament

    The PAC submits its reports and recommendations to Parliament, highlighting instances of financial mismanagement or deviations from the approved budget. This reporting mechanism is crucial for legislative oversight and public accountability.

    Public Opinions

    The PAC also conducts hearings, inviting senior officials and experts to clarify concerns related to audit reports. This engagement with the public enhances transparency and enables citizens to hold the government accountable for its financial actions.

    Conclusion

    Through its examination of CAG reports, investigation of irregularities, and objective recommendations, the PAC ensures that public funds are used effectively, promoting transparency and good governance in India.

    See less
Team
  • 0
TeamSupreme
Asked: September 10, 2024In:
  • 0

Roadmap for Answer Writing Introduction Introduce the context of the question. Mention India’s ranking in Transparency International’s 2022 Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI). State the purpose of the answer: to discuss factors contributing to the decline of public morality. Legal Factors Discuss the inadequacy of anti-corruption laws. Fact: ...

upsc: citizen charter transparency accountability and other aspects
  1. Team
    Best Answer
    Team Supreme

    Model Answer Introduction According to Transparency International’s 2022 Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI), India ranked 85th out of 180 countries, with a score of 40 out of 100, indicating a significant issue with corruption and public morality. The low ranking can be attributed to various legal,Read more

    Model Answer

    Introduction

    According to Transparency International’s 2022 Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI), India ranked 85th out of 180 countries, with a score of 40 out of 100, indicating a significant issue with corruption and public morality. The low ranking can be attributed to various legal, political, social, and cultural factors that have contributed to the decline of public morality in India.

    Body

    India’s low ranking on this index is a result of various factors:

    Legal Factors

    • Inadequate laws and regulations: India lacks comprehensive anti-corruption laws, and existing laws have loopholes that are exploited by corrupt individuals .
    • Weak enforcement: Law enforcement agencies often suffer from inadequate resources and limited autonomy, hindering effective action against corruption.
    • Delays in the judicial process: The slow and overburdened judicial system leads to delays in delivering justice, allowing corrupt individuals to evade punishment .

    Political Factors

    • Political patronage: Politicians may engage in corrupt practices to fund their election campaigns or secure loyalty from supporters .
    • Lack of transparency in political funding: The opaque nature of political funding, including the use of electoral bonds, complicates tracking the source of funds, promoting corruption .
    • Criminalization of politics: The presence of politicians with criminal backgrounds undermines the integrity of the political system and normalizes corrupt practices .

    Social Factors

    • Widespread acceptance of corruption: Corruption is often viewed as an acceptable practice to expedite processes, fostering a culture of tolerance .
    • Lack of awareness: Many citizens are unaware of their rights, making them vulnerable to corrupt practices by public officials .
    • Inadequate whistleblowing mechanisms: The absence of effective reporting mechanisms and fear of reprisal discourage whistleblowers from coming forward .

    Cultural Factors

    • Nepotism and favoritism: Cultural factors like kinship and caste-based networks promote nepotism in public appointments, leading to corruption .
    • Social hierarchies: Deep-rooted social hierarchies contribute to the misuse of power by those in authority, exploiting vulnerable populations .
    • Bribery as a cultural norm: In some cases, bribery is considered customary, further perpetuating corruption.

    Conclusion

    To address this issue, India needs to strengthen its anti-corruption laws, enhance transparency and accountability in the political system, create awareness about citizens’ rights, and promote a culture of integrity and ethical conduct in public life.

    See less
Team
  • 0
TeamSupreme
Asked: September 10, 2024In:
  • 0

Roadmap for Answer Writing 1. Introduction Overview of the Satyam Scandal: Briefly explain the key events of the Satyam Scandal, including Ramalinga Raju’s confession of accounting fraud in 2009. Significance of the Scandal: Highlight its impact on stakeholders and the need for reforms ...

upsc: citizen charter transparency accountability and other aspects
  1. Team
    Best Answer
    Team Supreme

    Model Answer Introduction The Satyam Scandal, often dubbed "India’s Enron," emerged in 2009 when Satyam Computer Services' chairman, Ramalinga Raju, confessed to falsifying company accounts. This revelation shocked stakeholders and prompted a reevaluation of corporate governance practices in India.Read more

    Model Answer

    Introduction

    The Satyam Scandal, often dubbed “India’s Enron,” emerged in 2009 when Satyam Computer Services’ chairman, Ramalinga Raju, confessed to falsifying company accounts. This revelation shocked stakeholders and prompted a reevaluation of corporate governance practices in India.

    Body

    The scandal led to significant reforms aimed at enhancing transparency and accountability in corporate governance.

    1. Role of Independent Directors

    The Satyam scandal underscored the crucial role of independent directors. In response, the Companies Act, 2013 mandated that at least one-third of the board of public companies must consist of independent directors, outlining specific duties and responsibilities to ensure effective oversight.

    2. Auditing Reforms

    The integrity of auditors came under scrutiny, leading to reforms that included the rotation of auditors and audit firms for listed companies every five years and ten years, respectively. This measure aims to reduce conflicts of interest and over-familiarity.

    3. Establishment of NFRA

    To enhance the auditing profession’s oversight, the National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) was established. This independent body is empowered to investigate professional misconduct and enforce compliance with accounting standards.

    4. SEBI Reforms

    The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) implemented stricter corporate governance norms, enhancing disclosure requirements for listed companies and ensuring quicker redressal of investor complaints.

    5. Whistleblower Policy

    The Companies Act, 2013 mandated listed companies to establish a vigilance mechanism, allowing directors and employees to report unethical behavior or suspected fraud, fostering a culture of accountability.

    6. Enhanced Disclosure Requirements

    The Act increased disclosure obligations, requiring directors to disclose interests in other entities and mandating detailed reporting of related-party transactions and managerial remuneration.

    7. Class Action Suits

    For the first time, provisions for class action suits were introduced, enabling shareholders and depositors to seek damages for fraudulent activities or violations of the law.

    Conclusion

    The Satyam Scandal marked a pivotal moment in India’s corporate governance landscape, leading to reforms aimed at ensuring greater transparency and accountability. The effectiveness of these changes will depend on their rigorous enforcement and adherence by the corporate sector.

    See less
Zain Khan
  • 0
Zain KhanBegginer
Asked: July 20, 2024In:
  • 0

Examine the government’s attempts to encourage the use of technology, such as e-auctioning and e-procurement, to increase the efficiency and openness of public procurement procedures, and consider the dangers and challenges that come with it.

upsc: citizen charter transparency accountability and other aspects
  1. Nikhil Reddy
    Nikhil Reddy Begginer

    Government’s Initiatives to Promote Technology in Public Procurement Introduction The integration of technology into public procurement processes has become crucial for enhancing transparency and efficiency. In India, initiatives like e-procurement and e-auctioning systems have been instrumental inRead more

    Government’s Initiatives to Promote Technology in Public Procurement

    Introduction

    The integration of technology into public procurement processes has become crucial for enhancing transparency and efficiency. In India, initiatives like e-procurement and e-auctioning systems have been instrumental in modernizing procurement practices. This analysis evaluates these initiatives, examines their impact, and assesses the challenges and risks associated with their implementation.

    Initiatives to Promote Technology in Public Procurement

    1. Government e-Marketplace (GeM)
      • Overview: GeM, launched in 2016, is an online platform designed to facilitate transparent and efficient procurement of goods and services by government departments and public sector enterprises. It aims to reduce procurement costs and enhance fairness in the procurement process.
        • Recent Example: In 2023, the GeM platform saw a significant increase in transactions, with over ₹1 lakh crore worth of procurement executed through the platform. The inclusion of new categories and enhanced user interfaces have improved accessibility for small and medium enterprises (SMEs).
      • Impact: GeM has streamlined procurement processes, reduced procurement cycles, and minimized opportunities for corruption by providing a transparent and competitive environment. It has also helped in ensuring that the best products are available at competitive prices.
        • Recent Example: During the COVID-19 pandemic, GeM played a crucial role in the procurement of medical supplies and equipment, ensuring timely and transparent supply chain management.
    2. e-Auctioning Systems
      • Overview: e-Auctioning is used for the sale of government assets and procurement of goods and services. It ensures transparency and competitive pricing by allowing multiple bidders to participate in real-time online auctions.
        • Recent Example: The e-Auction platform for spectrum auctions in 2022 allowed telecom operators to bid for frequency bands online, leading to a record-breaking revenue of ₹1.5 lakh crore for the government.
      • Impact: e-Auctioning has improved the transparency of asset sales and procurement processes by ensuring that bidding is open and competitive. It has also helped in achieving fair market value for government assets and reducing costs for procurement.
        • Recent Example: The Central Public Works Department (CPWD) utilized e-Auctioning for the disposal of obsolete assets, resulting in enhanced revenue generation and efficient asset management.
    3. e-Procurement Portals for Specific Sectors
      • Overview: Various sector-specific e-procurement portals have been developed to cater to specialized needs and streamline procurement processes within specific domains.
        • Recent Example: The National Informatics Centre (NIC) has developed the e-Procurement System for Public Works (e-PW), which is used for the procurement of construction-related services and materials. This system has been integrated into several state and central government departments to enhance procurement efficiency.
      • Impact: Sector-specific e-procurement systems have improved efficiency and transparency by addressing the unique requirements of different sectors, leading to better management of procurement activities.
        • Recent Example: The Department of Fertilizers has implemented an e-Procurement system for the purchase of fertilizers, resulting in streamlined procurement processes and reduced procurement delays.

    Challenges and Risks

    1. Digital Divide and Infrastructure Issues
      • Challenge: Limited access to digital infrastructure in rural and remote areas can hinder the effective use of e-procurement and e-auctioning systems. Inadequate internet connectivity and digital literacy can impact the participation of smaller vendors and stakeholders.
        • Recent Example: During the initial rollout of the GeM platform, several small suppliers from remote areas faced difficulties due to inadequate digital infrastructure and lack of training.
      • Impact: The digital divide can lead to unequal access to procurement opportunities, limiting the benefits of e-procurement systems for all stakeholders.
    2. Cybersecurity Concerns
      • Challenge: The increased use of technology in procurement processes raises concerns about cybersecurity. Sensitive procurement data and financial transactions are vulnerable to cyber-attacks and data breaches.
        • Recent Example: In 2023, a cyber-attack on a state-level e-procurement system led to unauthorized access to sensitive procurement data, highlighting the need for enhanced cybersecurity measures.
      • Impact: Cybersecurity risks can undermine the trust and integrity of e-procurement systems, potentially leading to data loss and financial losses.
    3. Resistance to Change
      • Challenge: Resistance from traditional procurement officials and vendors accustomed to manual processes can impede the adoption and effective implementation of technology-driven procurement systems.
        • Recent Example: Some government departments initially resisted the transition to e-Procurement systems, citing concerns about the complexity and reliability of new technology.
      • Impact: Resistance to change can slow down the implementation of e-procurement systems and affect their effectiveness in improving procurement processes.
    4. Complexity of Integration
      • Challenge: Integrating e-procurement and e-auctioning systems with existing procurement processes and legacy systems can be complex and resource-intensive.
        • Recent Example: The integration of GeM with state-level procurement systems faced challenges due to discrepancies in data formats and system compatibility issues.
      • Impact: Complex integration processes can lead to delays and operational inefficiencies, affecting the overall performance of technology-driven procurement systems.

    Conclusion

    The Indian government’s initiatives to promote e-procurement and e-auctioning have significantly improved transparency and efficiency in public procurement processes. Platforms like GeM and sector-specific e-procurement systems have streamlined procurement activities, reduced costs, and minimized corruption. However, challenges such as digital divide, cybersecurity concerns, resistance to change, and integration complexities need to be addressed to fully realize the benefits of these technology-driven systems. Addressing these challenges through enhanced infrastructure, robust cybersecurity measures, and effective change management strategies will be crucial for maximizing the impact of technology on public procurement.

    See less
Team
  • 0
TeamSupreme
Asked: August 13, 2024In:
  • 0

“Accountability and transparency are complementary to one another.” (125 Words) [UPPSC 2023]

uppsc: citizen charter transparency accountability and other aspects
  1. Krishna Vasudev
    Krishna Vasudev Learner

    Transparency and Accountability: Complementary Aspects 1. Transparency: It involves openness and clarity in operations, decisions, and processes. By making information accessible, transparency allows the public to be aware of governmental actions, policies, and decisions. This reduces corruption andRead more

    Transparency and Accountability: Complementary Aspects

    1. Transparency: It involves openness and clarity in operations, decisions, and processes. By making information accessible, transparency allows the public to be aware of governmental actions, policies, and decisions. This reduces corruption and promotes public trust.

    2. Accountability: It refers to the obligation of individuals and organizations to answer for their actions and be held responsible for any misconduct. Accountability ensures that entities operate within the established norms and are answerable to their stakeholders for their decisions and performance.

    3. Complementary Relationship: Transparency lays the groundwork for accountability by providing the necessary information for scrutiny. Without transparency, accountability cannot be effectively enforced as stakeholders lack the information required to question or evaluate actions.

    4. Examples: Right to Information (RTI) Act in India enhances transparency, facilitating greater accountability in government operations by enabling public scrutiny.

    Conclusion: Transparency and accountability are interdependent; transparency facilitates accountability by providing essential information, while accountability ensures that transparency is upheld and misuses are addressed. Together, they foster a more open and responsible governance system.

    See less
Rajashree Shirke
  • 0
Rajashree ShirkeLearner
Asked: January 25, 2025In:
  • 0

Roadmap for Answer Writing 1. Introduction Briefly introduce the United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) and India’s commitment to it. Mention that India ratified the UNCAC in 2011 and the need to align its domestic legal framework with international standards. Highlight the purpose of ...

upsc: Citizen Charter transparency accountability & other aspects
  1. Team
    Best Answer
    Team Supreme

    Model Answer Introduction India ratified the United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) in 2011, committing to implement a comprehensive framework to combat corruption. While India has made some progress in enacting anti-corruption laws, the current legal structure remains insufficient inRead more

    Model Answer

    Introduction

    India ratified the United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) in 2011, committing to implement a comprehensive framework to combat corruption. While India has made some progress in enacting anti-corruption laws, the current legal structure remains insufficient in addressing all aspects of corruption as required by UNCAC.

    Legal Framework and Reforms

    1. Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988: This Act criminalizes bribery and misconduct by public officials. Despite amendments in 2018 to align with UNCAC, it still fails to address some critical aspects such as the bribery of foreign public officials.
    2. Right to Information Act, 2005: Provides transparency in governance, allowing citizens to access information held by public authorities and promoting accountability.
    3. Whistleblower Protection Act, 2014: Aimed at safeguarding those who report corruption, but it lacks full implementation and does not offer sufficient protection against retaliation, in contrast to the requirements of UNCAC Article 33.
    4. Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016: Targets illicit property transactions, but implementation has been slow.
    5. Lokpal and Lokayuktas: The national and state anti-corruption bodies are meant to tackle corruption but have faced delays and issues in effective functioning.
    6. Special Courts and CBI: Although the establishment of special courts for fast-tracking corruption cases and the role of CBI is beneficial, delays in investigations and the low conviction rate (around 3%) remain significant issues.

    Inadequacies in Fulfilling UNCAC Commitments

    1. Limited Coverage: Existing laws do not fully address all forms of corruption outlined in the UNCAC, such as bribery of foreign public officials.
    2. Delays in Investigation and Trials: Corruption cases face long delays, with over 6,800 CBI corruption cases pending in courts as of December 2022.
    3. Weak Enforcement: Despite the presence of laws and bodies like CBI, corruption cases see low conviction rates, undermining the effectiveness of the legal framework.
    4. Cultural and Social Barriers: Deep-rooted corruption, influenced by societal norms and political interference, hinders progress.

    Conclusion

    While India has made progress in fulfilling its UNCAC commitments, its legal and institutional framework remains inadequate. Addressing gaps such as improved whistleblower protection, faster trials, broader coverage of corruption offenses, and strengthening political will are essential to meet the goals set by UNCAC and curb corruption effectively.

    See less
Shivani Kumari
  • 0
Shivani KumariBegginer
Asked: July 31, 2024In: , , ,
  • 0

How can every individual contribute in the society in decreasing the rate of corruption?

question
  1. Rudra prasad bhuyan
    Rudra prasad bhuyan Begginer

    Addressing corruption requires collective effort from all sectors of society. Every individual can play a role in reducing corruption by adopting ethical practices, participating in anti-corruption initiatives, and promoting transparency. Here are actionable ways individuals can contribute: PromoteRead more

    Addressing corruption requires collective effort from all sectors of society. Every individual can play a role in reducing corruption by adopting ethical practices, participating in anti-corruption initiatives, and promoting transparency. Here are actionable ways individuals can contribute:

    Promote Ethical Behavior

    • Lead by Example: Demonstrate honesty and integrity in personal and professional interactions. Refuse to engage in or tolerate corrupt practices.
    • Educate Others: Share knowledge about the negative impacts of corruption and the importance of ethical behavior with family, friends, and colleagues.

    Report Corruption

    • Use Reporting Mechanisms: Report any instances of corruption or unethical behavior to relevant authorities or whistleblower protection agencies. Many countries have hotlines or online platforms for reporting corruption.
    • Support Whistleblowers: Advocate for and support those who come forward with information about corruption, ensuring their safety and protection.

    Participate in Civic Activities

    • Engage in Community Initiatives: Get involved in local anti-corruption campaigns, community watch programs, or transparency initiatives.
    • Vote Responsibly: Vote for leaders and representatives who prioritize anti-corruption measures and demonstrate a commitment to ethical governance.

    Advocate for Transparency

    • Demand Accountability: Call for transparency in government and corporate practices. Support initiatives that promote open data, public disclosure, and accountability.
    • Support Anti-Corruption Policies: Advocate for the implementation and enforcement of strong anti-corruption laws and policies. Engage with policymakers to push for reforms.

    Foster a Culture of Integrity

    • Encourage Fair Practices: Promote fairness and meritocracy in educational, professional, and social environments. Discourage favoritism, bribery, and nepotism.
    • Support Ethical Businesses: Patronize businesses that adhere to ethical standards and avoid companies involved in corrupt practices.

    Educate Yourself and Others

    • Learn About Anti-Corruption Efforts: Stay informed about anti-corruption strategies, laws, and initiatives. Educate yourself on how to recognize and address corruption.
    • Raise Awareness: Conduct or participate in awareness campaigns to educate others about the detrimental effects of corruption and the importance of ethical behavior.

    Engage with Technology and Social Media

    • Use Digital Platforms: Leverage social media and other digital platforms to highlight issues of corruption, share information, and mobilize support for anti-corruption efforts.
    • Promote Transparency Tools: Support and use apps or tools designed to enhance transparency, such as those that track government spending or corporate practices.

    Support Civil Society Organizations

    • Donate and Volunteer: Contribute to or volunteer with organizations dedicated to fighting corruption, promoting transparency, and advocating for good governance.
    • Collaborate with NGOs: Work with non-governmental organizations that focus on anti-corruption, legal reform, and advocacy.

    Encourage Ethical Governance

    • Engage with Local Authorities: Participate in local government meetings and forums to voice concerns and push for ethical practices.
    • Support Institutional Reforms: Advocate for reforms within institutions and organizations to strengthen their anti-corruption measures and improve governance.

    Conclusion

    Individuals can make a significant impact on reducing corruption by adopting ethical practices, actively participating in anti-corruption initiatives, and promoting transparency. By leading by example, reporting unethical behavior, and engaging with civic and digital platforms, each person contributes to a culture of integrity and accountability, ultimately helping to decrease the rate of corruption in society.

    See less
Swapna Sundari
  • 0
Swapna SundariLearner
Asked: January 22, 2025In:
  • 0

Roadmap for Answer Writing 1. Introduction (30-40 words) Begin by briefly stating the purpose of the RTI Act and its intent to promote transparency and accountability in governance. Mention that while the RTI Act has made significant strides, its effectiveness has been affected ...

upsc: citizen charter transparency accountability and other aspects
  1. Team
    Best Answer
    Team Supreme

    Model Answer The Right to Information (RTI) Act of 2005 was designed to enhance transparency and accountability in government operations. However, the effectiveness of the RTI Act has been compromised due to the challenges faced by the Central Information Commission (CIC). Challenges Affecting the RRead more

    Model Answer

    The Right to Information (RTI) Act of 2005 was designed to enhance transparency and accountability in government operations. However, the effectiveness of the RTI Act has been compromised due to the challenges faced by the Central Information Commission (CIC).

    Challenges Affecting the RTI Act

    One of the primary issues is the delay in the appointment of Information Commissioners (ICs), leading to understaffing. For instance, despite a Supreme Court directive in December 2019 to fill vacancies, only one new Commissioner was appointed by 2021. This delay has resulted in increased workloads and inefficiency in handling RTI requests.

    Poor Enforcement of Penalties

    The CIC has also shown reluctance to impose penalties on government officials who fail to provide information, as reported by Satark Nagrik Sangathan. This reluctance diminishes the deterrent effect of the RTI Act, further weakening its impact. Consequently, citizens are often denied access to crucial information.

    Backlogs and Resource Constraints

    Another significant problem is the backlog of cases. By 2023, the CIC had 20,078 pending cases, which highlights the inefficiency in processing appeals and complaints. Additionally, limited financial resources, inadequate digital infrastructure, and a lack of staff training in technology exacerbate these delays, undermining the Act’s potential.

    Conclusion

    In light of these issues—delays in appointments, poor enforcement, backlogs, and resource constraints—it is evident that the RTI Act has faced challenges in implementation. While it has not become entirely redundant, its transformative potential has been significantly hindered. Expediting appointments, addressing the backlog, and improving infrastructure are essential steps to restore the effectiveness of the RTI Act.

    See less
Load More Questions

Resources & Suggestions

Mains Answer Writing Latest Articles

On: April 18, 2025

Daily Answer Writing Practice Questions (18 April 2025)

Do you agree with the claim that indecision and risk aversion are prevalent issues in Indian bureaucracy? Support your answer with logical reasoning. (150 words) ऐसा कहा जाता है कि भारतीय नौकरशाही में अनिर्णय और जोखिम से बचने की प्रवृत्ति ...

On: April 18, 2025 Comments: 0

Strengthening India’s Cyber Defence

Rising Threats Digital Era Challenges: 2024 marks a significant rise in digital threats, particularly from AI and cyberattacks. Key Issues: Disinformation campaigns. Cyber fraud affecting daily life. Current Major Cyber Threats Ransomware Rampage: Over 48,000 instances of WannaCry ransomware detected ...

On: April 18, 2025 Comments: 0

भारत की साइबर सुरक्षा

बढ़ते खतरे कृत्रिम बुद्धिमत्ता (AI) और साइबर हमले: 2024 में AI और साइबर हमलों के खतरे में वृद्धि। महत्वपूर्ण अवसंरचना पर हमले: डिजिटल हमलों और दुष्प्रचार अभियानों की संभावना बढ़ी है। प्रमुख साइबर खतरें रैनसमवेयर का प्रकोप: 48,000 से अधिक ...

Explore Our Blog