Examine recent attempts to improve openness in Indian public administration critically.
In India, the fundamental rights for armed forces personnel differ significantly from those enjoyed by civilians due to the unique nature of their duties and the need for discipline and efficiency in the military. The Constitution of India provides these distinctions to maintain the integrity and efRead more
In India, the fundamental rights for armed forces personnel differ significantly from those enjoyed by civilians due to the unique nature of their duties and the need for discipline and efficiency in the military. The Constitution of India provides these distinctions to maintain the integrity and effectiveness of the armed forces.
For instance, Article 33 of the Indian Constitution empowers the Parliament to restrict or abrogate the fundamental rights of members of the armed forces to ensure proper discharge of their duties and maintain discipline. This means that rights such as freedom of speech, association, and assembly can be curtailed. A soldier, unlike a civilian, cannot join a political party or participate in a protest march, as it might compromise military discipline and cohesion.
A practical example of this is the restriction on freedom of speech and expression. Armed forces personnel are prohibited from openly criticizing government policies or actions, which is permissible for civilians. This restriction ensures that the armed forces remain apolitical and focused on national security.
Similarly, the right to form associations or unions is limited for military personnel. This prevents the formation of groups that could disrupt the chain of command and operational effectiveness, essential for the swift and decisive actions required in military operations.
These restrictions highlight the balance between safeguarding individual rights and ensuring the collective security and operational readiness of the nation’s armed forces, showcasing the unique demands placed on those who serve in uniform.
See less
Model Answer Introduction The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) is a vital parliamentary committee in India that ensures the government’s financial accountability to the people. Its primary responsibility is to examine the annual audit reports of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG), whiRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) is a vital parliamentary committee in India that ensures the government’s financial accountability to the people. Its primary responsibility is to examine the annual audit reports of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG), which scrutinizes the appropriation and utilization of funds granted by Parliament.
Examination of Accounts
The PAC plays a crucial role in examining government accounts, scrutinizing how public funds have been allocated and spent. By ensuring expenditures align with the approved budget, the PAC holds the government accountable for its financial decisions. This process is essential for maintaining fiscal discipline and responsible governance.
Investigation of Financial Irregularities
The PAC investigates financial irregularities and mismanagement highlighted in the CAG’s reports. It identifies responsible parties for these lapses and recommends corrective measures, thus promoting transparency. By addressing issues of corruption and inefficiency, the PAC plays a pivotal role in safeguarding public resources.
Recommendations for Improvements
After analyzing the CAG’s findings, the PAC provides recommendations aimed at enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of public spending. These recommendations can lead to significant reforms in financial management, contributing to better governance.
Non-Partisan Nature
The PAC is composed of members from both the ruling party and the opposition, ensuring a non-partisan approach to its work. This diverse composition facilitates objective scrutiny of government actions, enabling the committee to focus on accountability without political bias.
Reporting to Parliament
The PAC submits its reports and recommendations to Parliament, highlighting instances of financial mismanagement or deviations from the approved budget. This reporting mechanism is crucial for legislative oversight and public accountability.
Public Opinions
The PAC also conducts hearings, inviting senior officials and experts to clarify concerns related to audit reports. This engagement with the public enhances transparency and enables citizens to hold the government accountable for its financial actions.
Conclusion
Through its examination of CAG reports, investigation of irregularities, and objective recommendations, the PAC ensures that public funds are used effectively, promoting transparency and good governance in India.
See less