“Corruption is protected by the need for government approval before dishonest officials may be prosecuted.” Analyze the assertion. (125 Words) [UPPSC 2020]
Appointment of the Central Vigilance Commissioner Recommendation of the Prime Minister The President of India appoints the Central Vigilance Commissioner (CVC) on the recommendation of the Prime Minister. This process ensures that the appointment is made based on the advice and selection of the headRead more
Appointment of the Central Vigilance Commissioner
Recommendation of the Prime Minister
The President of India appoints the Central Vigilance Commissioner (CVC) on the recommendation of the Prime Minister. This process ensures that the appointment is made based on the advice and selection of the head of the executive government.
Procedure for Appointment
- Selection Committee: The appointment of the Central Vigilance Commissioner is guided by a selection committee, which includes the Prime Minister, the Home Minister, and the leader of the opposition in the Lok Sabha. This committee is responsible for recommending the name of the candidate for the position.
- Role of the Prime Minister: As the head of the selection committee, the Prime Minister plays a pivotal role in the appointment process. The recommendations made by the Prime Minister are then submitted to the President for formal appointment.
Recent Examples
- Suresh N. Patel (2020): Suresh N. Patel was appointed as the Central Vigilance Commissioner in April 2020. His appointment was made following the recommendations of the Prime Minister and the selection committee. Patel’s appointment was noted for his previous experience in the banking sector and his role in strengthening vigilance mechanisms.
- Pradip Kumar Mohanty (2023): In August 2023, Pradip Kumar Mohanty was appointed as the Central Vigilance Commissioner. His appointment came after a thorough recommendation process led by the Prime Minister. Mohanty, who had a distinguished career in the Indian Police Service (IPS), was selected for his expertise in handling corruption and vigilance matters.
Conclusion
The appointment of the Central Vigilance Commissioner is a significant process that underscores the Prime Minister’s role in ensuring the integrity and efficiency of the country’s vigilance system. The President acts on the recommendation of the Prime Minister, ensuring a process that is both streamlined and reflective of the executive’s judgment in selecting a capable individual for this crucial position.
See less
Requirement of Government Sanction and Corruption 1. Protective Shield: The need for government sanction to prosecute dishonest officials often acts as a barrier to addressing corruption. This requirement can be exploited to delay or block investigations. For example, in the case of Vijay Mallya, deRead more
Requirement of Government Sanction and Corruption
1. Protective Shield: The need for government sanction to prosecute dishonest officials often acts as a barrier to addressing corruption. This requirement can be exploited to delay or block investigations. For example, in the case of Vijay Mallya, delays in sanctioning prosecution have been criticized for allowing financial misconduct to persist.
2. Bureaucratic Hurdles: Obtaining sanction involves bureaucratic procedures that can be manipulated. Recent instances, such as allegations against former Delhi Chief Secretary Anshu Prakash, highlight how such processes can obstruct timely justice.
3. Accountability Issues: The requirement can undermine accountability, allowing corrupt officials to escape consequences. In the Securities Scam of 1992, delays in sanctioning prosecution affected the speed of legal proceedings.
Conclusion: While the sanction process aims to prevent misuse of authority, it often becomes a protective shield for corruption, delaying justice and undermining accountability.
See less