Home/Ethics in Public Administration/Ethical Issues in International Relations & Funding
Ethical Issues in International Relations & Funding
Share
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
"It is not enough to talk about peace, one must believe in it; and it is not enough to believe in it, one must act upon it." In the present context, the major weapon industries of the developed nations are adversely influencing continuation of number of wars for their own self-interest, all around the world. What are the ethical considerations of the powerful nations in today's international arena to stop continuation of ongoing conflicts? (Answer in 150 words) [UPSC 2024]
Model Answer Introduction The quote, “It is not enough to talk about peace, one must believe in it; and it is not enough to believe in it, one must act upon it,” underscores the ethical responsibilities of powerful nations in the context of ongoing global conflicts. These nations often grapple withRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
The quote, “It is not enough to talk about peace, one must believe in it; and it is not enough to believe in it, one must act upon it,” underscores the ethical responsibilities of powerful nations in the context of ongoing global conflicts. These nations often grapple with the conflict between their economic interests, particularly in the arms industry, and their moral obligation to promote peace.
Genuine Belief and Action
To foster lasting peace, nations must not only advocate for it but also take concrete actions. The United Nations’ peacekeeping missions exemplify a commitment to stabilizing conflict zones, demonstrating how belief in peace can manifest through active involvement (Source: United Nations Peacekeeping).
Economic Interests vs. Moral Responsibility
Powerful nations often prioritize economic gains from the arms industry over genuine peace efforts. For instance, the U.S. arms industry has reportedly profited significantly from conflicts in the Middle East, particularly during the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan (Source: The Guardian). This profit-driven approach contributes to prolonged violence rather than resolution.
Lobbying and Influence
The influence of arms manufacturers in shaping foreign policy often leads to prolonged conflicts. For example, the supply of arms to non-state actors in Syria and Yemen has exacerbated civil wars and humanitarian crises (Source: Amnesty International). Such practices highlight the ethical dilemma faced by nations regarding their role in fostering instability.
Ethical Responsibilities
Conclusion
To genuinely address ongoing conflicts, powerful nations must reconcile their economic interests with their ethical responsibilities. Advocacy for peace must be accompanied by tangible actions, responsible arms trading, and active support for diplomatic solutions. Peace requires sustained commitment from all stakeholders, moving beyond mere rhetoric to impactful action.
See lessExamine the ethical challenges that may arise when foreign-funded research projects conduct medical studies in developing countries. (Answer in 150 words)
Model Answer Ethical Challenges in Foreign-Funded Medical Research in Developing Countries Foreign-funded medical research in developing countries presents several ethical challenges that can undermine the integrity and fairness of such studies. 1. Informed Consent Issues One of the primary ethicalRead more
Model Answer
Ethical Challenges in Foreign-Funded Medical Research in Developing Countries
Foreign-funded medical research in developing countries presents several ethical challenges that can undermine the integrity and fairness of such studies.
1. Informed Consent Issues
One of the primary ethical concerns is the lack of informed consent from local populations. Often, participants may not fully understand the risks involved or the nature of the study, leading to exploitation.
2. Unequal Distribution of Risks and Benefits
There is frequently an imbalance in how risks and benefits are distributed. Local communities may bear the risks associated with the research, while the benefits, such as new treatments or technologies, are often directed elsewhere.
3. Vulnerability of Local Teams
Local research teams may feel pressured to accept unethical study designs due to reliance on foreign funding for their infrastructure development. This creates a conflict of interest that can compromise ethical standards.
4. Non-Universal Ethical Standards
Different countries have varying ethical standards and regulations, making it challenging to maintain uniformity in ethical practices. This disparity can lead to ethical lapses in research conducted in developing countries.
5. Monitoring Difficulties
Limited resources in developing nations often hinder effective monitoring of research projects, increasing the risk of unethical practices going unchecked.
6. Data Protection Concerns
Research data must be handled in accordance with local laws to ensure privacy and data integrity. However, this is often overlooked, leading to potential misuse of sensitive information.
Conclusion
These ethical challenges highlight the need for a robust ethical framework that respects local populations, ensures informed consent, and promotes equitable benefit-sharing. By addressing these issues, foreign-funded medical research can be more ethical and beneficial to developing countries.
See lessThough several institutions exist to ensure fairness in international relations, states often disregard moral values and the guidance of these institutions in pursuit of their own interests. Discuss with examples. (Answer in 150 words)
Model Answer Disregard for Moral Values in International Relations Despite the existence of various institutions designed to ensure fairness in international relations, states often prioritize their own interests over moral values. 1. Sense of Insecurity Countries frequently act on the basis of mutuRead more
Model Answer
Disregard for Moral Values in International Relations
Despite the existence of various institutions designed to ensure fairness in international relations, states often prioritize their own interests over moral values.
1. Sense of Insecurity
Countries frequently act on the basis of mutual distrust and insecurity. For example, despite commitments to non-violence, nations like North Korea pursue nuclear weapons, undermining global peace efforts.
2. Just War Theory
The ethical considerations surrounding warfare often lead to moral dilemmas. The U.S. decision to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II is an example where the justification of military action conflicted with humanitarian principles.
3. Regional Supremacy Aspirations
Nations often engage in practices that undermine fairness for regional dominance. China’s support for Pakistan through arms funding and opposition to sanctions illustrates how strategic partnerships can prioritize national interests over ethical considerations.
4. Colonial Hangover
Despite advocating for territorial sovereignty, countries may interfere in others’ affairs. The British Parliament’s discussions regarding the abrogation of Article 370 in India exemplify this contradiction.
5. Distributive Justice
Developed nations, primarily responsible for climate change, often fail to take equitable responsibility in mitigation efforts, highlighting a disregard for collective justice.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while institutions exist to promote fairness, states frequently disregard these moral frameworks in pursuit of self-interest, leading to significant ethical challenges in global relations.
See lessIs war ever ethical? Analyze this question in the context of international conflicts. (200 words)
Model Answer The ethics of war is a deeply debated topic, especially in the context of contemporary international conflicts like the Russia-Ukraine war or the Israel-Palestine conflict. While war is generally seen as a tragic and undesirable outcome, there are circumstances where it can be considereRead more
Model Answer
The ethics of war is a deeply debated topic, especially in the context of contemporary international conflicts like the Russia-Ukraine war or the Israel-Palestine conflict. While war is generally seen as a tragic and undesirable outcome, there are circumstances where it can be considered ethical, based on several justifications.
Just War Principles
Ethical Concerns
Despite these justifications, war often violates fundamental ethical principles. The deliberate targeting of civilians, such as in the Israel-Hamas war (2023), where thousands of children died, is considered morally unacceptable. Additionally, wars lead to long-term harm, such as displacement in the Syrian Civil War, and the use of weapons of mass destruction, like the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, raises serious ethical concerns.
In conclusion, while war can sometimes be deemed ethical under certain conditions, its devastating consequences often outweigh these justifications. The hope is for a world where war is a rare, last-resort option.
See lessDo individuals have a moral obligation to act in ways that mitigate climate change, even if it requires significant personal or financial sacrifice?
One would say that, from an ethical viewpoint, people owe a moral obligation to future generations and the planet. They can make a difference to mitigate climate change by reducing their carbon footprint or conserving energy, wasting less and living styles that are more sustainable. Another importanRead more
One would say that, from an ethical viewpoint, people owe a moral obligation to future generations and the planet. They can make a difference to mitigate climate change by reducing their carbon footprint or conserving energy, wasting less and living styles that are more sustainable. Another important impact is through policy advocacy that creates room for such innovation and also holds corporations and entities accountable for the environmental damages they perpetuate.
But then, it’s equally important to realize the limit an action of an individual might take. Systemic change mostly needs collective action or change in policies. Hence, although all efforts made individually are crucial, they should accompany wider social and governmental action on proper action regarding climate change.
See lessAt the international level, the bilateral relations between most nations are governed on the policy of promoting one’s own national interest without any regard for the interest of other nations. This leads to conflicts and tensions between the nations. How can ethical consideration help resolve such tensions? Discuss with specific examples. (150 words) [UPSC 2015]
Ethical Considerations in Bilateral Relations At the international level, bilateral relations are often driven by self-interest, leading to conflicts. However, incorporating ethical considerations can foster cooperation and mitigate tensions. 1. Promoting Mutual Benefits: Ethical diplomacy enRead more
Ethical Considerations in Bilateral Relations
At the international level, bilateral relations are often driven by self-interest, leading to conflicts. However, incorporating ethical considerations can foster cooperation and mitigate tensions.
1. Promoting Mutual Benefits: Ethical diplomacy encourages nations to seek win-win solutions. For example, the Paris Agreement on climate change reflects a commitment to global welfare, urging countries to act responsibly for the planet’s future, balancing national interests with collective goals.
2. Respecting Sovereignty: Ethical approaches emphasize respect for national sovereignty. The India-Bhutan relationship illustrates this; India supports Bhutan’s development while respecting its autonomy, leading to a stable and cooperative partnership.
3. Humanitarian Approaches: Nations can prioritize humanitarian concerns over mere strategic interests. The global response to the COVID-19 pandemic, where countries collaborated to share vaccines, showcases how ethical considerations can override competitive instincts.
In conclusion, integrating ethical principles into foreign policy can transform adversarial relations into cooperative partnerships, fostering a more peaceful international community.
See lessStrength, peace and security are considered to be the pillars of international relations. Elucidate. (150 words) [UPSC 2017]
Strength, Peace, and Security: Pillars of International Relations Strength: Strength refers to a nation’s ability to influence and project power on the global stage. This includes military, economic, and diplomatic capabilities. For example, the U.S. military presence and economic influence in varioRead more
Strength, Peace, and Security: Pillars of International Relations
Strength:
Strength refers to a nation’s ability to influence and project power on the global stage. This includes military, economic, and diplomatic capabilities. For example, the U.S. military presence and economic influence in various regions allow it to shape international policies and alliances.
Peace:
Peace is the foundation for stable international relations and cooperation. Countries prioritize diplomacy and conflict resolution to maintain harmony. The 2020 Abraham Accords between Israel and several Arab nations exemplify how diplomatic efforts can lead to regional peace and cooperation.
Security:
Security involves ensuring the safety and stability of nations from external and internal threats. For instance, the European Union’s Schengen Area provides border-free travel, which enhances regional security and economic integration by addressing common security challenges collectively.
Together, strength, peace, and security create a balanced framework for fostering stable and cooperative international relations, ensuring a conducive environment for global development and collaboration.
See less‘The will to power exists, but it can be tamed and be guided by rationality and principles of moral duty. Examine this statement in the context of international relations. (150 words) [UPSC 2020]
The Will to Power in International Relations: Rationality and Moral Duty **1. The Will to Power a. Definition: The concept of the will to power, articulated by philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, refers to the inherent drive of states or leaders to assert dominance and control. In international relatioRead more
The Will to Power in International Relations: Rationality and Moral Duty
**1. The Will to Power
a. Definition:
The concept of the will to power, articulated by philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, refers to the inherent drive of states or leaders to assert dominance and control. In international relations, this is reflected in nations seeking strategic advantages and influence.
b. Recent Example:
The geopolitical competition between China and the United States illustrates the will to power, as both countries vie for economic, military, and technological supremacy.
**2. Guidance by Rationality and Moral Duty
a. Rationality:
States can channel their will to power through rational decision-making, focusing on strategic stability and long-term benefits. For instance, the Paris Agreement on climate change represents a rational approach to global cooperation, prioritizing collective well-being over unilateral gains.
b. Moral Duty:
International principles and norms, such as those outlined by the United Nations, guide state behavior towards ethical conduct. India’s engagement in peacekeeping missions showcases how moral duty can temper aggressive inclinations and promote global stability.
Conclusion:
See lessWhile the will to power drives international relations, it can be moderated by rational strategies and adherence to moral principles, as evidenced by cooperative agreements and ethical practices in global diplomacy.
Russia and Ukraine war has been going on for the last seven months. Different countries have taken independent stands and actions keeping in view their own national interests. We are all aware that war has its own impact on the different aspects of society, including human tragedy. What are those ethical issues that are crucial to be considered while launching the war and its continuation so far? Illustrate with justification the ethical issues involved in the given state of affair. (150 words) [UPSC 2022]
Ethical Issues in War: Russia-Ukraine Conflict 1. Humanitarian Impact Human Tragedy: War results in significant human suffering, including loss of civilian lives, displacement, and trauma. The Russia-Ukraine conflict has caused a massive humanitarian crisis with millions of refugees and casualties.Read more
Ethical Issues in War: Russia-Ukraine Conflict
1. Humanitarian Impact
Human Tragedy: War results in significant human suffering, including loss of civilian lives, displacement, and trauma. The Russia-Ukraine conflict has caused a massive humanitarian crisis with millions of refugees and casualties. The ethical question arises about the justification of actions that lead to such severe human suffering.
2. Justification for War
Legitimate Cause: Ethical considerations include whether the war is initiated for a just cause. In this case, Russia’s invasion is widely debated for its legitimacy under international law. The principle of “Just War Theory” emphasizes the need for a just cause and proper authority for launching a war.
3. Proportionality
Military Necessity vs. Civilians: The principle of proportionality demands that military actions should not cause excessive civilian harm compared to the anticipated military advantage. Recent reports indicate Russian strikes on civilian areas, raising ethical concerns about proportionality and the protection of non-combatants.
4. Accountability
War Crimes: Ensuring accountability for war crimes and violations of international law is crucial. The international community must address atrocities such as executions and attacks on non-military targets to uphold ethical standards.
Recent Example: The UN’s International Criminal Court (ICC) has begun investigating alleged war crimes in Ukraine, reflecting efforts to address these ethical issues and ensure justice.
These ethical considerations highlight the complex moral landscape of war, stressing the importance of upholding humanitarian principles and legal norms even amidst conflict.
See less"In the era of Globalization International ethics is the need of hour for ensuring peace and stability among the nations". Explain critically. (125 Words) [UPPSC 2023]
International Ethics in the Era of Globalization Need for International Ethics Global Interdependence: Globalization has increased interdependence among nations, making international ethics crucial for maintaining peace and stability. For example, the Paris Agreement on climate change illustrates hoRead more
International Ethics in the Era of Globalization
Need for International Ethics
Challenges
In summary, while international ethics is essential for global harmony, challenges such as diverse standards and power imbalances must be addressed to ensure effective and equitable solutions.
See less