Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
To what extent can Germany be held responsible for causing the two World Wars? Discuss critically.
The world has witnessed two great wars in quick succession in the form of world war 1(1914-19) and world war 2(1939-45). The first war engulfed entire Europe and the second was far more complex involving almost all the countries of the world. Till today they're different views among historians as toRead more
The world has witnessed two great wars in quick succession in the form of world war 1(1914-19) and world war 2(1939-45). The first war engulfed entire Europe and the second was far more complex involving almost all the countries of the world. Till today they’re different views among historians as to who was to blame for these wars. But a large proportion of them lay the blame squarely at the feet of Germany. Kaiser Wilhelm 2 policy of Weltpolitik and Hitler expansionist policy, threatened world peace and plunged the world into two great wars.
How Far Germany Was Responsible For World War 1
German Role In The War
Other Factors That Led To World War I
Historians who believe Germany was not primarily responsible for the war base their conclusion on the fact that other nations behaved just as badly as Germany did in the decades preceding the war, and that factors outside the control of any one country or individual were more responsible for the war. Factors like militarism, nationalism, alliance systems, and socio-cultural factors played a prominent role.
There are thus several intricately related factors that led to world war I, but these factors were brought to fore by German actions. However, laying war guilt solely on Germany through the Treaty of Versailles was not only unfair and also laid seeds for another world war where again German actions played a prominent role.
How Far Germany Was Responsible For World War II
German Role In The War
Other Factors That Led To World War II
Historians and most observers of the war blame the harsh conditions imposed by the Versailles treaty as the main reason for German bitterness and resulted in the war. But the German grievances related to the treaty were resolved by 1938. So apart from German Grievances other factors also played a huge role that led to war.
Germany certainly created conditions that precipitated the crisis but it would be unfair to blame Germany solely for the world wars. Apart from Germany many major European powers are also to blame either for creating the circumstances that cornered Germany like during world war I or for their inaction in stopping Hilter like during world war II.
See lessContrary to the expectations, the linguistic reorganisation of States kept India united. Examine.
Linguistic reorganisation of the states referred to the redrawing of the boundaries of the states on the basis of language which became an important issue after independence. Though this was a long pending demand which had support of all political parties almost since the 1920's, the painful memorieRead more
Linguistic reorganisation of the states referred to the redrawing of the boundaries of the states on the basis of language which became an important issue after independence. Though this was a long pending demand which had support of all political parties almost since the 1920’s, the painful memories and impact of partition made many national leaders skeptical about this endeavour. It was feared that linguistic reorganization might affect the unity of India and may result in its balkanization. However a rational assessment of linguistic reorganization 67 years after the first linguistic states of Andhra pradesh was formed indicates that linguistic reorganization proved to be a boon rather than being a bane to Indian unity.
Fears Concerning Linguistic Reorganization
Although linguistic reorganisation was earlier accepted by the Congress leaders in 1920, many of the national leaders felt that after partition and severe communal disharmony prevailing at that time, adding one more element of division based on language will seriously impact the unity of India. This view was seconded by various committees like Dhar committee, JVP committee, and even SRC on the basis of which finally linguistic reorganization happened.
How Linguistic Reorganization Kept India United
After independence,demand for linguistic states was on the rise as could be seen in case of the demand for the Andhra state which was led by Potti Sriramulu His death after a 56 days fast further accelerated the movement and led to the formation of the Andhra state. However,this spurred the struggle for formation of other states on linguistic lines in other parts of the country. Resulting appointment of the States Reorganisation Commission in 1953 which gave nod for linguistic reorganization of states. The SRC act passed in 1956 led to the formation of 14 states and 6 union territories. Despite initial inhibitions towards linguistic states,it was later accepted that linguistic reorganization kept India united.
The disputes over boundaries between different states, linguistic minorities and economic issues such as sharing of waters, and power and surplus food still persist. However, the linguistic reorganisation of the states has removed an important contentious issue that could have jeopardized India’s integrity and has thus strengthened the cause of Indian unity.
See less