Answer: In the given case, an inter-caste couple has decided to live together without the consent of their respective families. The couple fear for their lives while their families have accused each other of abduction. Given the social repercussions of the issues, the officer in charge has to find an amicable solution.

(a) Ethical dilemmas faced by me, as the Superintendent of Police (SP):

• Social norms vs. rule of law: Inter caste union and live-in relationship might not be accepted in the social settings of a region. But the judiciary in its various judgements have given legal recognition of live-in relationships. Also, there is no legal hurdle for inter caste marriages in India.
• Individual liberty vs. family values: The officer has to make a choice between upholding individual liberty and choice of the couple and adhering to the family values of the respective families.

(b) Suitable course of action that I will take as the SP:

• To begin with, I will have a preliminary enquiry of the case initiated and make sure that all the facts stated by my subordinate and the girl are validated.
• The couple should be provided police protection and it must be ensured that no harm is done to them. They should also be shielded against any pressure by the community. If needed, legal, financial and moral support should also be extended to the couple.
• I will meet the families and convince them to accept their children’s freedom of choice. I will also take help from elders in the community, local leaders as they command respect within the community, their words will have a calming effect on the families.
• I will also take help from NGOs, if needed, regarding spreading of progressive ideas and also for providing support to the couple.
• If the families are unrelenting and continue to take matters in their own hands in violation of the law, I will initiate legal action against them as per the law of the land.
• In the long run, I will endeavour to create avenues to sensitize the community against the practice of casteism and honour killing. The community must be made aware about the repercussions of these heinous sins.

(c) Reasons for social acceptance of violence and honour killings in some parts of India:

• Caste endogamy: Marriage within the same caste, i.e. caste endogamy is one of the features of the caste system. Though there have been changes, caste endogamy continues to persist, particularly among the locally dominant caste groups, in some parts of India. In certain circumstances, its violation may be seen as bringing dishonour to the family and may also result in violence among families and social groups.
• Different social status: Other than the caste, social status is another consideration. If a couple marries against the wishes of parents, rejecting the notions of status and equality, the family takes it as humiliation and loss of family name in their social circles.
• Property considerations: It is believed that the girl, who has already asserted her right to marry a person of her choice, may assert her right to her share in ancestral property, which is now safeguarded by law in India. The fear of social ranks being obliterated and property getting transferred may make the resistance to such relationships more violent and widespread.
• Expectation of altruistic cooperation: An individual is expected to sacrifice personal freedom and desires in accordance with the specified codes of honour for the benefit of the society. Punishment for misconduct is viewed as a form of altruism that benefits the group at the expense of the individual. In such a social setting, the reputation and social standing of an individual or his family and even community is based on the sexual behaviour and morality of its women and any diverging behaviour is deemed to bring shame to these institutions.
• Cultural beliefs and traditions: It plays a decisive role in the freedom given to its women. Intermixing of girls and boys, especially those belonging to different castes and faith, is often unacceptable. The sexual behaviour of women is readily associated with the symbolic capital of a family and any misconduct may warrant stern action.

The “Honour-related” violence thrives due to the silence of the community, lack of evidence, and delayed legal punishment. The ideals and notions embedded in the collective consciousness of a community can’t be changed overnight. However, with education, awareness of legal procedures and human rights, and conviction of perpetrators involved in such crimes, it is believed that a change in mindset toward honour-related crimes may be attained in due course of time.

Answer: The given case study highlights a situation where a civil servant has to prioritise in a rescue operation during a natural disaster, utilise limited resources at his disposal accordingly and simultaneously maintain law and order. The key stakeholders involve the locals, tourists, international convoy, and government of both the states and the Centre.

(a) Issues faced by Sunil in the given scenario include:

• Inexperience: Sunil has recently been posted as a District Magistrate (DM) in the hilly district. Therefore, the foremost issue he faces is not being fully aware of the topography, available infrastructure, potential weak areas as per occurrence of natural hazards, areas vulnerable to violence etc.
• Saving the pilgrimage site: The district has a famous pilgrimage site. Since people’s faith is associated with such sites, one major issue is to get information regarding its damage and protect it from any further damage due to spill over effects of the disaster.
• Rescuing the international convoy: An international convoy is also trapped in the disaster. Therefore, it has become a matter of international concern. An appropriate and quick search and rescue operation needs to be conducted.
• Distribution of resources: Available resources are to be distributed efficiently so that locals and stranded tourists from other states can be saved.
• Infrastructure constraints: As roads and bridges are damaged, Sunil would face issues in conducting/coordinating rescue operations efficiently.
• Basic necessities: Sunil would face issues regarding arrangement of adequate food, water, medicine and shelter facilities for those rescued, as well as those who are trapped.
• Safety of women: There would be an issue of safety of both local women and female tourists.
• Retrieval and identification of dead bodies: There has been a high casualty. If immediate steps are not taken to retrieve the bodies, a law-and-order problem can escalate. Also, there can be a health hazard in the district.
• Resolution of complaints: The complaints and requests flooding from different corners of the country need to be addressed.

In this situation, Sunil has to take on a leadership role, work in collaboration with experienced employees who might be his subordinates, efficiently distribute the available resources and manpower and display emotional intelligence and ethical decision-making in assigning priority to rescue operations for different groups of people trapped.
(b) Course of action for Sunil to ensure law and order as well as to expedite rescue operations of all concerned:

• Sunil, being a District Magistrate, and head of the District Disaster Management Authority, needs to call an emergency meeting of the concerned officials, including senior local officers who are well aware of the topography.
• He should assess the available resources at hand, infrastructure in the affected areas that can be used in the operation and areas which are vulnerable e.g., a dam or similar structure that needs to be protected from damage.
• He should create several teams and assign specific roles to the National and State Disaster Response Force for search, rescue, and rehabilitation missions.
• He should deploy emergency response teams and portal/helplines separately for the victims who are trapped and their families. Sunil can also make use of GPS/GIS technology to map the exact points where victims are trapped or a greater number of people need rescuing.
• Sunil needs to inform the Central Government of the steps being planned for saving the international convoy and immediately ask for assistance/resources if needed.
• He can request for the assistance of the army to construct temporary roads or bridges in critical areas to fasten the rescue operations.
• Sunil should dispatch a special team to assess the damage of the pilgrim site and take immediate action for its protection.
• The state government needs to be informed about the extent of the disaster and the food, water, and medicine requirements for the people trapped in the district.
• Sunil should identify the areas (school building, hospitals, premises of temples, etc.) where rescued victims will be brought for further assistance. Conveyance facilities need to be arranged for pilgrims to be transferred to a safe location from where they can proceed to their homes. He should also ensure that the district and rescue centres remain safe for women and children.
• He should also make use of technology to broadcast messages for the trapped victims about how to identify their positions, where to head for rescuing, which areas to avoid, etc.
• He should devise a platform available to all where the victims can identify themselves as safe, as trapped in a particular location, as being rescued and kept at a particular location. Further, names of those who are found dead should be updated.
• Sunil should ensure that the local shopkeepers are not creating monopoly or hoarding essential goods.
• Sunil should also assign roles related to lost and found articles so that people are able to find their documents or other belongings which they might have lost because of the disaster.

Earthquakes are unforeseen and uncertain situations. For a developing and populous country like India, resources often fall short while dealing with such disasters. In such a situation, Sunil has to be prudent and emotionally intelligent. Further, to avoid panic and a law-and-order situation, periodic dissemination of information should be prioritised.