Describe the reasons why an individual might be disqualified under The Representation of the People Act, 1951. Talk about the corrective actions that the disqualified representatives can take as well.
President's Rule in India: Constitutional Provisions and Controversies President's Rule, governed by Article 356, is a significant yet contentious provision in the Indian Constitution. It enables the central government to take direct control of a state when its constitutional machinery fails. GroundRead more
President’s Rule in India: Constitutional Provisions and Controversies
President’s Rule, governed by Article 356, is a significant yet contentious provision in the Indian Constitution. It enables the central government to take direct control of a state when its constitutional machinery fails.
Grounds for Imposition:
- Failure of constitutional machinery in the state
- Breakdown of law and order
- Financial emergency or economic instability
- Corruption or misgovernance
Procedure and Effects:
- The state Governor reports to the President about the state’s inability to function according to constitutional provisions.
- The President’s proclamation must be approved by both houses of Parliament within two months.
- The state assembly is suspended or dissolved, and the Governor assumes executive authority.
Recent Controversies:
- Maharashtra (2019): President’s Rule was imposed amid political uncertainty following a hung assembly, sparking debates about its necessity and timing.
- Jammu and Kashmir (2018-2019): The extended period of President’s Rule, followed by the reorganization of the state, raised questions about the use of Article 356 in sensitive regions.
President’s Rule remains a powerful tool in Indian federalism, but its application is closely scrutinized for potential misuse and its impact on state autonomy. Balancing the need for central intervention with respect for state sovereignty continues to be a critical aspect of its implementation.
See less
The Representation of the People Act, 1951 outlines the grounds for disqualification of representatives in India. The key grounds for disqualification include: 1. Conviction for certain offenses: Representatives can be disqualified if they are convicted for offenses such as bribery, undue influence,Read more
The Representation of the People Act, 1951 outlines the grounds for disqualification of representatives in India. The key grounds for disqualification include:
1. Conviction for certain offenses: Representatives can be disqualified if they are convicted for offenses such as bribery, undue influence, or the use of corrupt practices during elections.
2. Failure to lodge election expenses: Representatives can be disqualified if they fail to lodge a true account of their election expenses within the prescribed time limit.
3. Holding an office of profit: Representatives can be disqualified if they hold an office of profit under the central or state government, which could compromise their independence and impartiality.
4. Unsoundness of mind: Representatives can be disqualified if they are declared of unsound mind by a competent court.
5. Bankruptcy: Representatives can be disqualified if they are declared bankrupt by a competent court.
Disqualified representatives have access to remedial measures, such as:
1. Filing an appeal: Disqualified representatives can file an appeal with the appropriate courts or tribunals to challenge the disqualification decision.
2. Seeking a stay: Disqualified representatives can seek a stay on the disqualification order from the courts, pending the final disposition of their appeal.
3. Seeking re-election: Disqualified representatives may be eligible to contest subsequent elections, provided they no longer meet the grounds for disqualification.
These provisions aim to maintain the integrity of the electoral process and ensure that only eligible individuals represent the people in the legislative bodies. The remedial measures safeguard the democratic rights of the disqualified representatives.
See less