Describe the reasons why an individual might be disqualified under The Representation of the People Act, 1951. Talk about the corrective actions that the disqualified representatives can take as well.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
The Representation of the People Act, 1951 (RPA) was enacted to provide for the conduct of elections to the Houses of Parliament and to the House/s of Legislature of each State, details about the structure of administrative machinery for the conduct of elections; qualifications and disqualifications for membership to the two houses; the corrupt practices and other offences with respect to such elections and the decision of doubts and disputes arising therein.
The Act contains provisions for disqualification both for being chosen as, and, for being, a member of either house of the Parliament or the Legislature of the State. These have been broadly classified into the following grounds:
The Supreme Court of India, in its judgement in the Lily Thomas Case, 2013 ruled that any MP, MLA, or MLC who is convicted of a crime and sentenced to a minimum of two years in jail loses his membership in the house immediately.
Remedies available against such disqualification:
Other than the provision of disqualification of a member through RPA, 1951, the Constitution of India also provides for disqualification of members on grounds of defection under the 10th Schedule.
The Representation of the People Act, 1951 outlines the grounds for disqualification of representatives in India. The key grounds for disqualification include:
1. Conviction for certain offenses: Representatives can be disqualified if they are convicted for offenses such as bribery, undue influence, or the use of corrupt practices during elections.
2. Failure to lodge election expenses: Representatives can be disqualified if they fail to lodge a true account of their election expenses within the prescribed time limit.
3. Holding an office of profit: Representatives can be disqualified if they hold an office of profit under the central or state government, which could compromise their independence and impartiality.
4. Unsoundness of mind: Representatives can be disqualified if they are declared of unsound mind by a competent court.
5. Bankruptcy: Representatives can be disqualified if they are declared bankrupt by a competent court.
Disqualified representatives have access to remedial measures, such as:
1. Filing an appeal: Disqualified representatives can file an appeal with the appropriate courts or tribunals to challenge the disqualification decision.
2. Seeking a stay: Disqualified representatives can seek a stay on the disqualification order from the courts, pending the final disposition of their appeal.
3. Seeking re-election: Disqualified representatives may be eligible to contest subsequent elections, provided they no longer meet the grounds for disqualification.
These provisions aim to maintain the integrity of the electoral process and ensure that only eligible individuals represent the people in the legislative bodies. The remedial measures safeguard the democratic rights of the disqualified representatives.