How can the discrepancies in the formation of the Andes and Himalayas be explained by the theory of plate tectonics? (Answer in 150 words)
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
The Plate tectonics is a theory that explains the movement of the Earth’s lithospheric plates and consequent formation of major landforms like mountains and events like volcanoes and earthquakes. The theory states that the Earth’s lithosphere, which is the outermost layer of the planet, is broken into several large plates that move relative to each other.
The lithospheric plates rest on the underlying asthenosphere. These plates move due to the convection currents in the mantle, which are driven by the Earth’s internal heat sources, such as the radioactive decay of elements.
Formation of Himalayan Mountains:
Formation of Andes Mountains:
Therefore, there is a fundamental difference in the formation of Himalayas and Andes. While Himalayas are formed due to collision of two continental plates, the Andes are formed by the convergence of oceanic plate and continental plate (subduction of one plate under another). This subduction leads to formation of volcanoes in Andes such as Ojos Del Salado, Cotopaxi, Chimborazo etc., which are absent in the case of Himalayas.
The formation of the Andes and Himalayas can be explained by the theory of plate tectonics through the interaction of different types of plate boundaries.
Andes Formation:
Himalayas Formation:
Thus, while both mountain ranges arise from convergent plate boundaries, the Andes involve oceanic-continental subduction, and the Himalayas result from continental-continental collision, leading to differences in their geological characteristics and formation processes.