Why is it so that infrastructure developments like roads, bridges, flyovers etc. collapse shortly after their inauguration but ancient buildings, temples and monuments have been standing strong against the forces of nature since ages?
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Good Question Suramya,
The disparity between the durability of modern infrastructure and ancient structures can be attributed to several factors. Ancient builders employed traditional construction techniques, using locally sourced materials like stone, brick, and mortar, which were more durable and sustainable. They also designed structures with a deep understanding of the local environment and natural forces, such as earthquakes and floods. In contrast, modern infrastructure may not always be designed with the same level of consideration.
Additionally, ancient structures were often built with a focus on longevity, with craftsmen taking pride in their work. Modern construction projects, on the other hand, may prioritize short-term gains over long-term sustainability. The use of modern materials like concrete and steel, while strong, can be prone to corrosion and degradation. Furthermore, inadequate maintenance, regulatory oversight, and human error can contribute to the premature collapse of modern infrastructure.
In contrast, ancient structures have been able to withstand the forces of nature due to their robust design, quality construction, and regular maintenance over the centuries. The combination of these factors has allowed ancient buildings, temples, and monuments to stand the test of time, while modern infrastructure may require more attention to detail and a focus on long-term sustainability to achieve similar longevity.