Differentiate the working of Planning Commission and Niti Aayog and its impact on Indian Federalism. (Answer limit: 100 words, Marks 10) [RPSC 2023]
Want to get Work Experience? |
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Sorry, you do not have permission to ask a question, You must login to ask a question.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Differentiate the working of Planning Commission and Niti Aayog and its impact on Indian Federalism. (Answer limit: 100 words, Marks 10) [RPSC 2023]
India has seen a tenfold increase in forest fire incidents over the past two decades. Annual economic losses from forest fires are estimated at ₹1.74 lakh crore. 36% of India’s forest area is prone to fires, despite only a 1.12% ...
वनाग्नि की घटनाएँ: पिछले दो दशकों में भारत में वनाग्नि की घटनाओं में दस गुना वृद्धि हुई है। आर्थिक नुकसान: वार्षिक आर्थिक नुकसान ₹1.74 लाख करोड़ के आसपास है। वन क्षेत्र वृद्धि: वन क्षेत्र में केवल 1.12% की वृद्धि के ...
The authority that administrators hold can lead to significant benefits for the nation when used appropriately, but can also cause damage and tarnish reputations if misused. Elaborate. (Answer in 150 words) हालाँकि निष्पक्षता को लोक सेवा के प्रमुख नैतिक मूल्यों ...
The Planning Commission, established in 1950, focused on centralized planning, allocating resources, and formulating Five-Year Plans. It emphasized top-down approaches, often sidelining state inputs. In contrast, Niti Aayog, formed in 2015, promotes decentralized planning, encouraging state participation and cooperative federalism. It emphasizes sustainable development and innovation, fostering a more inclusive approach.
Niti Aayog’s collaborative framework strengthens Indian federalism by empowering states in decision-making and policy implementation, allowing for diverse regional needs. This shift from a centralized model to a more participatory one enhances state autonomy and aligns development goals with local aspirations, thereby reinforcing the federal structure.