India’s Opposition to Mediation on Kashmir

**1. Sovereignty and Bilateralism: India insists that Kashmir is an integral part of its territory, and thus, any resolution should come through direct bilateral negotiations with Pakistan, not third-party mediation. The government views mediation as an infringement on its sovereignty.

**2. Historical Precedent: India has consistently rejected external mediation, reflecting its position that issues should be resolved through direct dialogue. For instance, India’s stance was reaffirmed during the recent skirmishes with Pakistan, maintaining that Kashmir is a bilateral issue.

**3. International Framework: India believes that mediation could undermine the existing framework established by UN resolutions, which call for bilateral dialogue. It aims to prevent any potential changes to this framework that could affect its position on Kashmir.

India’s stance ensures that the issue remains under its direct control, reflecting its broader foreign policy strategy.