The phrases “surgical strikes” and “hot pursuit” are frequently used in relation to using force to stop terrorist attacks. Talk on the strategic implications of these moves. (200 words) [UPSC 2016]
TeamSupreme
Resources & Suggestions
Mains Answer Writing Latest Articles
On: February 22, 2025
Comments:
0
Indo-US Relation: Areas of Cooperation & Conflicts
Key Areas: Defense, technology, trade, energy, and regional cooperation. Key Areas of Cooperation 1. Defense and Security Transition from buyer-seller to co-production and technology sharing. India as a Major Defense Partner (MDP) and inclusion in STA-1. Access to advanced technologies, ...
On: February 22, 2025
Comments:
0
भारत-अमेरिका संबंध: सहयोग और संघर्ष के क्षेत्र
मुख्य विषय: भारत-अमेरिका संबंधों की मजबूती, विशेषकर रक्षा, प्रौद्योगिकी और क्षेत्रीय सहयोग में प्रगति। सहयोग के प्रमुख क्षेत्र 1. रक्षा एवं सुरक्षा सहयोग भारत और अमेरिका के बीच रक्षा संबंधों का विस्तार। प्रमुख रक्षा साझेदार (MDP) का दर्जा और STA-1 ...
On: February 22, 2025
Comments:
0
India’s Disaster Management
The article discusses the growing tensions between the Centre and states regarding disaster relief funding in India. It emphasizes the need for a transparent and equitable disaster management framework. Key Disaster Threats India Faces Increasing Frequency of Extreme Weather Events ...
Model Answer
Introduction
The military strategies of ‘Hot Pursuit’ and ‘Surgical Strikes’ are critical responses to cross-border terrorism. ‘Hot Pursuit’ refers to chasing a retreating enemy into its territory, while ‘Surgical Strikes’ involve precise operations aimed at minimizing collateral damage. Both strategies have significant strategic implications in counter-terrorism efforts.
Strategic Impact of Hot Pursuit and Surgical Strikes
Deterrence
Both strategies serve as powerful deterrents against hostile entities and state sponsors of terrorism. For instance, India’s surgical strike following the Uri attack in 2016 demonstrated a clear intolerance for cross-border terrorism, sending a strong message to adversaries about the consequences of such actions.
Disruption of Terror Infrastructure
These military operations aim to degrade terrorist capabilities by targeting their infrastructure. Disrupting training camps, communication lines, and logistical support reduces the operational effectiveness of terrorist groups. This strategic focus is essential for curtailing future attacks and undermining the enemy’s morale.
Boost Morale
The execution of such operations bolsters the morale of security forces and reassures the public about their safety. Demonstrating a willingness to retaliate not only strengthens the resolve of military personnel but also enhances public confidence in the government’s ability to handle security threats.
International Diplomacy
Hot Pursuit and Surgical Strikes can also draw international attention to terrorism, compelling other nations to reconsider their policies towards harboring terrorist groups. Such actions may facilitate diplomatic pressure on countries that support or tolerate terrorism. However, they also risk escalating tensions and potentially leading to international disputes.
Conclusion
While ‘Hot Pursuit’ and ‘Surgical Strikes’ can be effective military responses to terrorist threats, they should be integrated into a broader strategy that includes diplomatic efforts and internal security measures. This balanced approach is essential for achieving long-term peace and stability.
Strategic Impact of ‘Hot Pursuit’ and ‘Surgical Strikes’
1. Definitions and Examples:
2. Strategic Impact:
Overall, ‘Hot Pursuit’ and ‘Surgical Strikes’ are strategic tools used to address terrorism, balancing the need for effective response with considerations of international relations and long-term security.