Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Although the Indian Constitution provides fundamental rights to all citizens, it allows certain restrictions on the rights of the members of the Armed Forces. This is primarily because of the nature of their service and the need to maintain discipline and national security.
Article 33: This Article gives the Parliament power to restrict or abolish, as regards members of the Armed Forces, police forces and such force as may hereafter be created, any right conferred by this Part. Such provisions can provide for restrictions, for instance, right to form union or strike which is essential to maintain discipline and operational efficiency in the forces.
Discipline and National Security: The Armed Forces operate on a strict code of discipline and hierarchy. Restraints upon certain rights are considered necessary for swift and effective command, maintenance of morale, and national security. For example, the right to freedom of speech may be restricted not to allow sensitive information to be disclosed, which could have a detrimental impact on national security.
-Specialized Nature of Service: Armed forces require manning on more occasions in challenging and demanding environments involving risks and sacrifices of significant proportions. Some rights may be limited as justification toward ensuring safety and well-being of personnel and operational effectiveness.