How has the adoption of capitalism influenced socio-economic disparities and entrepreneurial growth in India?
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Although capitalism is believed to be controlled through the mechanism of a “free market” and is believed to be democratic in its functioning, the reality is quite different. Capitalists amass vast amounts of wealth, which, in today’s scenario, equates to power. This power is wielded in all spheres of Indian society: cultural, economic, environmental, spiritual, amongst others.
In the Indian context, the billionaires possess significant power which holds a great risk to equity of resources. A woman having gold-infused glass of water worth INR 49 lakhs (a life changing amount for millions in the Indian subcontinent) speaks volumes about the disparity and dystopian control at the hands of capitalists when it comes to Indian public’s wealth. According to Deccan Herald, “India’s richest 1% holds 40% of the wealth”, which is alarming for entrepreneurs as well.
Due to the vast wealth inequality in India, the ordinary public’s access to capital is severely hindered. This leads to a demotivated/impossible approach to entrepreneurship; with hesitancy and inability of Indians to look into entrepreneurship ventures. Finally, wealth inequality from capitalism is one of the leading causes of economic stagnation and unemployment.
In my opinion, a capitalistic economy is not particularly bad to society. The case of India is a good example where it has both worked for and against it, or, what people say, a double-edged sword.
On one hand, it rapidly fuels the economic growth which in turn creates jobs and ultimately boosts living standards for many. This led to a entrepreneurial growth which now shows in – numerous startups along with innovative small businesses in all over India.
A live example can be shown with the rise of tech giants like Infosys and TCS which is a testament to the entrepreneurial spirit unleashed by market-driven forces. Where millions are lifted out of poverty, while the middle class expanding significantly.
Even so, on the other hand, the chase for profits is worsening the already existing social inequalities.
Which means, the gap that has been between the rich and poor has widened more. Leaving a small section of the population with accumulating wealth while a large section struggles with poverty.
Furthermore, this economic imbalance leads to challenges in areas like education, healthcare, and infrastructure, specifically in the rural India.
In my opinion, a capitalistic economy is not particularly bad to society. The case of India is a good example where it has both worked for and against it, or, what people say, a double-edged sword.
On one hand, it rapidly fuels the economic growth which in turn creates jobs and ultimately boosts living standards for many. This led to a entrepreneurial growth which now shows in – numerous startups along with innovative small businesses in all over India.
A live example can be shown with the rise of tech giants like Infosys and TCS which is a testament to the entrepreneurial spirit unleashed by market-driven forces. Where millions are lifted out of poverty, while the middle class expanding significantly.
Even so, on the other hand, the chase for profits is worsening the already existing social inequalities.
Which means, the gap that has been between the rich and poor has widened more. Leaving a small section of the population with accumulating wealth while a large section struggles with poverty.
Furthermore, this economic imbalance leads to challenges in areas like education, healthcare, and infrastructure, specifically in the rural India.