The deployment of facial recognition technology (FRT) in public spaces raises significant ethical implications, primarily concerning privacy, surveillance, and potential biases. **Privacy** is a major concern, as FRT can capture and analyze individuals’ faces without their consent, leading to unauthorized tracking and data collection. This mass surveillance capability threatens individual freedom and anonymity, raising **civil liberties** issues.

**Bias and discrimination** are also critical issues, as FRT systems have shown varying accuracy across different demographic groups. Misidentifications can lead to wrongful detentions or unfair targeting, disproportionately affecting minorities and marginalized communities. These biases stem from training data that may not represent diverse populations adequately.

To address these concerns, governments and organizations are taking several measures:

1. Regulation and Legislation: Some governments are enacting laws to regulate FRT use, ensuring it aligns with privacy rights and ethical standards. Examples include the EU’s GDPR and specific state laws in the U.S. like California’s ban on FRT in police body cameras.
2. Transparency and Accountability: Organizations deploying FRT are being urged to maintain transparency about its use and implement accountability measures. This includes clear policies on data usage, retention, and sharing.
3. Bias Mitigation: Efforts are being made to improve the accuracy and fairness of FRT systems through better training data and algorithms designed to minimize bias.
4. Public Consultation: Engaging with the public to discuss the benefits and risks of FRT deployment ensures a democratic approach to its use.

By addressing these concerns, governments and organizations aim to balance the benefits of FRT with the protection of individual rights and ethical standards.