Granville Austin’s critique of the Indian Constitution highlights its pragmatic approach to accommodating diverse needs while ensuring stability. He praised the Constitution for its ability to reconcile the demands of democracy with the realities of a deeply plural society. Austin noted its flexibility and foresight in addressing social and economic inequalities, while also acknowledging its potential pitfalls, such as the over-centralization of power and bureaucratic complexities. He argued that the Constitution’s design, although robust, often faced challenges in implementation due to political and administrative constraints. Overall, Austin’s critique underscores the Constitution’s strengths in laying a foundation for democratic governance while pointing out areas requiring ongoing reform and adaptation.