Home/upsc: parliament & state legislatures/Page 2
- Recent Questions
- Most Answered
- Answers
- No Answers
- Most Visited
- Most Voted
- Random
- Bump Question
- New Questions
- Sticky Questions
- Polls
- Followed Questions
- Favorite Questions
- Recent Questions With Time
- Most Answered With Time
- Answers With Time
- No Answers With Time
- Most Visited With Time
- Most Voted With Time
- Random With Time
- Bump Question With Time
- New Questions With Time
- Sticky Questions With Time
- Polls With Time
- Followed Questions With Time
- Favorite Questions With Time
‘Once a Speaker, Always a Speaker’! Do you think this practice should be adopted to impart objectivity to the office of the Speaker of Lok Sabha? What could be its implications for the robust functioning of parliamentary business in India? (150 words) [UPSC 2020]
The principle of "Once a Speaker, Always a Speaker" suggests that former Speakers of the Lok Sabha should retain their impartiality and respect associated with the office. Adopting this practice could bolster the objectivity of the Speaker, as it emphasizes the long-term commitment to neutrality eveRead more
The principle of “Once a Speaker, Always a Speaker” suggests that former Speakers of the Lok Sabha should retain their impartiality and respect associated with the office. Adopting this practice could bolster the objectivity of the Speaker, as it emphasizes the long-term commitment to neutrality even after leaving office.
Implications:
However, care must be taken to ensure that former Speakers do not overstep their roles or become politically active in ways that could compromise their impartiality.
See lessRajya Sabha has been transformed from a ‘useless stepney tyre’ to the most useful supporting organ in past few decades. Highlight the factors as well as the areas in which this transformation could be visible. (250 words) [UPSC 2020]
The Rajya Sabha, India's Council of States, has undergone significant transformation over the past few decades, evolving from a largely symbolic body into a crucial legislative and oversight institution. This transformation is evident in several key factors and areas: 1. Enhanced Legislative Role: ARead more
The Rajya Sabha, India’s Council of States, has undergone significant transformation over the past few decades, evolving from a largely symbolic body into a crucial legislative and oversight institution. This transformation is evident in several key factors and areas:
1. Enhanced Legislative Role:
2. Effective Oversight:
3. Representation of States:
4. Expertise and Debate:
5. Revisions and Amendments:
6. Increased Public Engagement:
Conclusion: The Rajya Sabha has evolved into a dynamic and influential component of India’s parliamentary system. Its enhanced role in legislation, oversight, and representation underscores its transformation into a vital supporting organ of governance.
See lessIndividual Parliamentarian’s role as the national law maker is on a decline, which in turn, has adversely impacted the quality of debates and their outcome. Discuss. (250 words) [UPSC 2019]
Decline in Individual Parliamentarian's Role and Its Impact on Legislative Quality Introduction: The role of individual Parliamentarians as national lawmakers in India has been diminishing, which has adversely affected the quality of debates and legislative outcomes. This shift has significant impliRead more
Decline in Individual Parliamentarian’s Role and Its Impact on Legislative Quality
Introduction: The role of individual Parliamentarians as national lawmakers in India has been diminishing, which has adversely affected the quality of debates and legislative outcomes. This shift has significant implications for the effectiveness of democratic processes and the functioning of the legislature.
Reduced Individual Influence: Traditionally, individual Parliamentarians played a crucial role in shaping legislation through active participation in debates, discussions, and committee work. However, the increasing centralization of power within party leadership and the executive branch has reduced individual contributions. Party whips and leadership directives often limit independent thought and debate, thereby marginalizing the role of individual legislators in policy-making.
Impact on Quality of Debates: The decline in individual Parliamentarians’ roles has negatively impacted the quality of parliamentary debates. Limited opportunities for substantive discussion mean that debates often become superficial, with Members of Parliament (MPs) adhering strictly to party lines rather than engaging in critical analysis and constructive dialogue. This reduction in meaningful scrutiny affects the thorough examination of bills and diminishes the quality of legislative discourse.
Reduced Legislative Oversight: Effective legislative oversight requires active and informed participation from individual MPs. As their role diminishes, there is a decrease in rigorous questioning of executive actions and policies. This decline in oversight weakens accountability, as fewer MPs are engaged in detailed examination of government performance and expenditure, thereby diminishing the checks and balances system.
Dependence on Whip System: The party whip system has become more pronounced, with MPs often required to vote in line with party directives rather than personal or constituency interests. This centralization of voting power limits individual MPs’ ability to advocate for diverse viewpoints, thereby impacting the diversity of debates and legislative outcomes.
Potential for Reform: To address these issues, reforms could focus on enhancing the autonomy of individual MPs and promoting greater transparency and accountability within the legislative process. Encouraging more robust parliamentary committees and providing opportunities for MPs to engage in in-depth discussions could improve the quality of legislative work.
Conclusion: The diminishing role of individual Parliamentarians has adversely affected the quality of parliamentary debates and legislative outcomes. Reforms aimed at restoring individual influence and enhancing legislative scrutiny are essential for improving the effectiveness of the parliamentary system and ensuring more comprehensive and representative law-making processes.
See lessWhy do you think the committees are considered to be useful for parliamentary work? Discuss, in this context, the role of the Estimates Committee. (150 words) [UPSC 2018]
Usefulness of Committees for Parliamentary Work and the Role of the Estimates Committee Utility of Committees: In-Depth Examination: Committees allow for detailed examination of complex issues that may not be feasible in full parliamentary sessions. They offer specialized scrutiny and expert input oRead more
Usefulness of Committees for Parliamentary Work and the Role of the Estimates Committee
Utility of Committees:
Role of the Estimates Committee:
Conclusion: Committees enhance parliamentary work by enabling detailed scrutiny and improving legislative efficiency. The Estimates Committee, in particular, plays a crucial role in evaluating government expenditure and ensuring financial accountability.
See less"Simultaneous election to the Lok Sabha and the State Assemblies will limit the amount of time and money spent in electioneering but it will reduce the government’s accountability to the people." Discuss. (150 words) [UPSC 2017]
Simultaneous Elections: Impact on Accountability and Costs Simultaneous elections for the Lok Sabha and State Assemblies can significantly reduce electioneering time and costs. Conducting elections together streamlines logistical operations, minimizes campaign expenditure, and consolidates electionRead more
Simultaneous Elections: Impact on Accountability and Costs
Simultaneous elections for the Lok Sabha and State Assemblies can significantly reduce electioneering time and costs. Conducting elections together streamlines logistical operations, minimizes campaign expenditure, and consolidates election resources.
However, this approach may impact government accountability. When elections are held at different times, citizens can assess and react to the performance of both the central and state governments separately. This periodic scrutiny ensures that governments remain responsive to specific local and national issues. For instance, in the past, state-specific issues have driven separate state elections, enabling voters to hold state governments accountable for their performance.
If Lok Sabha and State Assembly elections occur simultaneously, the focus may shift to broader, less specific issues, diminishing individual government accountability. Voters might have fewer opportunities to evaluate and influence the performance of governments on distinct fronts, reducing their effectiveness in ensuring responsive governance.
See lessTo what extent, in your view, the Parliament is able to ensure accountability of the executive in India? (150 words) [UPSC 2021]
Parliament's Role in Ensuring Executive Accountability in India 1. Legislative Oversight: The Parliament plays a crucial role in holding the executive accountable through debates and discussions on government policies and decisions. Members of Parliament (MPs) question the executive, scrutinizing thRead more
Parliament’s Role in Ensuring Executive Accountability in India
1. Legislative Oversight: The Parliament plays a crucial role in holding the executive accountable through debates and discussions on government policies and decisions. Members of Parliament (MPs) question the executive, scrutinizing their actions and decisions.
2. Committees: Parliamentary committees, such as the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) and the Estimates Committee, review and audit government spending and performance, ensuring transparency and accountability.
3. Motion of No Confidence: The Parliament can pass a motion of no confidence against the government, which, if passed, can compel the resignation of the executive. This serves as a critical check on the executive’s power.
4. Question Hour and Debates: Regular sessions like Question Hour and parliamentary debates provide platforms for MPs to challenge and review executive actions and policies.
Conclusion: While the Parliament has mechanisms to ensure executive accountability, challenges such as party loyalty and political dynamics can sometimes limit its effectiveness.
See less"While the national political parties in India favor centralization, the regional parties are in favor of State autonomy." Comment. (250 words) [UPSC 2022]
In India, the tension between national political parties and regional parties reflects a deeper debate on the balance of power between the center and the states. National Political Parties and Centralization: National parties like the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Indian National Congress (INRead more
In India, the tension between national political parties and regional parties reflects a deeper debate on the balance of power between the center and the states.
National Political Parties and Centralization: National parties like the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Indian National Congress (INC) often favor centralization. This preference stems from their desire to maintain uniformity in policies and governance across the country. Centralization allows for a cohesive national strategy on issues such as economic development, security, and foreign policy. It also helps national parties consolidate power and implement their agendas more effectively across various states. Centralized control can facilitate uniform policy implementation and resource distribution, reducing regional disparities.
Regional Political Parties and State Autonomy: Conversely, regional parties such as the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK), the Trinamool Congress (TMC), and the Telangana Rashtra Samithi (TRS) advocate for greater state autonomy. These parties argue that local governments are better positioned to understand and address the unique needs and issues of their regions. They often push for decentralization to ensure that states have more control over their resources, administrative functions, and policy-making. This autonomy is seen as a way to promote regional development, preserve cultural identities, and enhance local governance.
Conflict and Cooperation: The contrast between centralization and state autonomy leads to political and administrative tensions. While centralization aims for national integration and uniformity, state autonomy emphasizes regional diversity and local self-governance. The Indian Constitution provides a federal structure that balances these interests, but the dynamic political landscape continually tests this balance.
In summary, the conflict between national parties’ centralization and regional parties’ demand for state autonomy is a reflection of India’s complex federal structure, where both central authority and regional interests must be carefully balanced to ensure effective governance and national unity.
See lessDiscuss the essential conditions for exercise of the legislative powers by the Governor. Discuss the legality of re-promulgation of ordinances by the Governor without placing them before the Legislature. (250 words) [UPSC 2022]
Essential Conditions for Exercise of Legislative Powers by the Governor: Constitutional Basis: The Governor's legislative powers are exercised under the Constitution of India. These powers include the ability to summon, prorogue, or dissolve the Legislature, and to give assent or withhold assent toRead more
Essential Conditions for Exercise of Legislative Powers by the Governor:
Legality of Re-Promulgation of Ordinances:
The re-promulgation of ordinances by the Governor without placing them before the Legislature is constitutionally questionable. Ordinances, issued under Article 123 (for the President) and Article 213 (for the Governor) of the Constitution, are meant to address urgent situations when the Legislature is not in session.
Key Issues:
In summary, while the Governor has specific legislative powers under the Constitution, re-promulgating ordinances without legislative approval is considered unconstitutional, as it bypasses the Legislature’s role and undermines democratic processes.
See lessDiscuss the role of the Vice-President of India as the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha.
The Vice-President of India, as the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha, plays a crucial role in maintaining order and decorum during proceedings. They preside over sessions, ensuring adherence to parliamentary rules and facilitating smooth debates. The Chairman has the authority to cast a deciding vote inRead more
The Vice-President of India, as the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha, plays a crucial role in maintaining order and decorum during proceedings. They preside over sessions, ensuring adherence to parliamentary rules and facilitating smooth debates. The Chairman has the authority to cast a deciding vote in the event of a tie and can also refer bills to committees for detailed examination. Additionally, they represent the Rajya Sabha in interactions with the President and other legislative bodies. This role is essential for upholding the integrity of the legislative process and ensuring effective functioning of the upper house of Parliament.
See lessExplain the structure of the Parliamentary Committee system. How far have the financial committees helped in the institutionalization of the Indian Parliament? (250 words) [UPSC 2023]
The Parliamentary Committee system in India plays a crucial role in the functioning of Parliament, enabling detailed examination of legislation, administrative actions, and financial matters. The system is structured into several types of committees: Structure of the Parliamentary Committee System SRead more
The Parliamentary Committee system in India plays a crucial role in the functioning of Parliament, enabling detailed examination of legislation, administrative actions, and financial matters. The system is structured into several types of committees:
Structure of the Parliamentary Committee System
Impact of Financial Committees
In summary, the Parliamentary Committee system, with its structure of standing, ad-hoc, joint, and special committees, plays a vital role in the detailed examination of legislative, administrative, and financial matters. Financial committees, in particular, have significantly contributed to the institutionalization of accountability and transparency in Indian parliamentary procedures, enhancing the effectiveness and credibility of Parliament.
See less