Roadmap for Answer Writing Introduction Brief Overview of the Coelho Case Introduce the case (I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu, 2007). Mention its significance in constitutional law. Body Section 1: Key Holdings of the Coelho Case Judgment Summary State the Supreme Court’s ruling regarding the Ninth Schedule. Emphasize ...
The doctrine of basic structure is a constitutional principle that prevents the fundamental principles of the Indian Constitution for being changed by amendments. In the Kesavananda Bharti case, for the first time this doctrine came into view in the history of Indian Constitution. In this case, theRead more
The doctrine of basic structure is a constitutional principle that prevents the fundamental principles of the Indian Constitution for being changed by amendments. In the Kesavananda Bharti case, for the first time this doctrine came into view in the history of Indian Constitution. In this case, the Supreme Court held that the parliament has the power to ammend Constitution, including fundamental rights but, the basic structure of the Constitution could not be altered even by a constitutional ammendment.
Additionally, the judgement also added that the parliament can only amend the constitution and have no power to rewrite.
Following are the key elements of the doctrine of basic structure which helps to ensure that the basic structure of the constitution remains unaltered:
- Democracy
- Fundamental rights
- Federalism
- Judicial Review
- Rule of law
- Separation of powers
See less
Model Answer Introduction The I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu (2007) is a landmark judgment by the Supreme Court of India that significantly reinforced the doctrine of the basic structure of the Constitution and underscored the importance of judicial review. Body In the Coelho case, the Supreme CRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
The I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu (2007) is a landmark judgment by the Supreme Court of India that significantly reinforced the doctrine of the basic structure of the Constitution and underscored the importance of judicial review.
Body
In the Coelho case, the Supreme Court held that any law placed in the Ninth Schedule of the Indian Constitution, which was intended to protect certain laws from judicial scrutiny, is not immune from judicial review if it violates the basic structure of the Constitution. The Ninth Schedule was initially created by the First Amendment in 1951 to shield land reform laws from judicial challenges. However, its application expanded over time to include various other laws, effectively insulating them from judicial oversight.
The judgment asserted that even if a law is placed in the Ninth Schedule, it remains subject to judicial review if it infringes upon the Constitution’s basic structure. This ruling limited Parliament’s power to insulate laws from judicial scrutiny, reaffirming that no law can contravene fundamental constitutional principles (Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu, 2007).
Judicial review serves as a critical mechanism for the courts to evaluate the constitutionality of legislative and executive actions, ensuring compliance with fundamental rights and the rule of law. The basic structure doctrine, established in the Kesavananda Bharati case (1973), identifies several essential features of the Constitution that cannot be altered or removed by constitutional amendments, with judicial review being one of them.
Conclusion
The Coelho case highlights the vital role of judicial review as a key element of the Constitution’s basic features. By asserting the supremacy of the basic structure doctrine over the Ninth Schedule, the Supreme Court reinforced the necessity of judicial review in safeguarding constitutional values and principles against potential legislative overreach.
See less