Since the Indian Constitution’s creation, it has been difficult to reconcile Fundamental Rights with the Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSPs). Discuss using the pertinent case law as a guide. (Answer in 150 words)
The Preamble of the Indian Constitution encapsulates its core ideals: sovereignty, socialism, secularism, democracy, republicanism, and the principles of justice, liberty, equality, and fraternity. These ideals guide the entire document and influence constitutional interpretation. Key Judicial InterRead more
The Preamble of the Indian Constitution encapsulates its core ideals: sovereignty, socialism, secularism, democracy, republicanism, and the principles of justice, liberty, equality, and fraternity. These ideals guide the entire document and influence constitutional interpretation.
Key Judicial Interpretations:
- Kesavananda Bharati Case (1973): Declared the Preamble as part of the Constitution, establishing that its basic structure cannot be altered.
- S.R. Bommai Case (1994): Emphasized secularism and federalism as fundamental principles.
- Minerva Mills Case (1980): Highlighted the balance between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles, protecting the Constitution’s basic structure.
These cases reinforced the inviolability of the Preamble’s principles, preventing arbitrary amendments, and ensuring justice, liberty, equality, and fraternity in governance. The Preamble’s interpretation has guided the judiciary in preserving the democratic, secular, and socialist fabric of the nation, shaping India’s constitutional jurisprudence.
See less
Fundamental Rights (FRs) and Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP) lay down the framework for regulating the relationship between the citizen and the state. Fundamental Rights are the most basic rights which the Constitution guarantees to its people by making them justiciable, while DPSPs (whiRead more
Fundamental Rights (FRs) and Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP) lay down the framework for regulating the relationship between the citizen and the state. Fundamental Rights are the most basic rights which the Constitution guarantees to its people by making them justiciable, while DPSPs (which are non-justiciable) act as a guide for law and policy formulation by the government.
The question of reconciling the two arises in the context of several amendments made by the Parliament to override the fundamental rights and the consequent judicial review by the Supreme Court.
Therefore, the present position in law is that both, Fundamental Rights and DPSPs, must be harmoniously construed. No question arises about one prevailing over the other.
See less