Home/upsc: evolution of indian economy & reforms/Page 2
- Recent Questions
- Most Answered
- Answers
- No Answers
- Most Visited
- Most Voted
- Random
- Bump Question
- New Questions
- Sticky Questions
- Polls
- Followed Questions
- Favorite Questions
- Recent Questions With Time
- Most Answered With Time
- Answers With Time
- No Answers With Time
- Most Visited With Time
- Most Voted With Time
- Random With Time
- Bump Question With Time
- New Questions With Time
- Sticky Questions With Time
- Polls With Time
- Followed Questions With Time
- Favorite Questions With Time
Analyze the government's policies and measures to address the challenges of urban development, such as the Smart Cities Mission, the Atal Mission for Rejuvenation and Urban Transformation (AMRUT), and the National Urban Housing and Habitat Policy, and evaluate their effectiveness in promoting sustainable and inclusive urban growth.
The Indian government has implemented several key policies and measures to address urban development challenges, focusing on creating sustainable and inclusive urban environments. Here’s an analysis of the Smart Cities Mission, Atal Mission for Rejuvenation and Urban Transformation (AMRUT), and theRead more
The Indian government has implemented several key policies and measures to address urban development challenges, focusing on creating sustainable and inclusive urban environments. Here’s an analysis of the Smart Cities Mission, Atal Mission for Rejuvenation and Urban Transformation (AMRUT), and the National Urban Housing and Habitat Policy, including their effectiveness in promoting sustainable urban growth:
1. Smart Cities Mission
Objectives:
Impact and Effectiveness:
2. Atal Mission for Rejuvenation and Urban Transformation (AMRUT)
Objectives:
Impact and Effectiveness:
3. National Urban Housing and Habitat Policy
Objectives:
Impact and Effectiveness:
Overall Assessment
In conclusion, while the Smart Cities Mission, AMRUT, and the National Urban Housing and Habitat Policy have made significant strides in addressing urban development challenges, continued efforts are needed to overcome implementation hurdles, ensure equitable benefits, and achieve comprehensive, sustainable urban growth.
See lessEvaluate the effectiveness of the government's initiatives to promote the growth of the manufacturing sector, such as the 'Make in India' program and the National Manufacturing Policy, in addressing the challenges of low productivity, limited integration with global value chains, and job creation.
The Indian government's initiatives to promote the growth of the manufacturing sector, notably the 'Make in India' program and the National Manufacturing Policy were designed to tackle several challenges and boost the sector’s contribution to the economy. Here's an evaluation of their effectivenessRead more
The Indian government’s initiatives to promote the growth of the manufacturing sector, notably the ‘Make in India’ program and the National Manufacturing Policy were designed to tackle several challenges and boost the sector’s contribution to the economy. Here’s an evaluation of their effectiveness in addressing key issues such as low productivity, limited integration with global value chains, and job creation:
1. ‘Make in India’ Program
Objectives:
Increase Manufacturing Output: Enhance the sector’s contribution to GDP.
Boost Employment: Create job opportunities in manufacturing.
Enhance Global Competitiveness: Attract foreign investment and integrate with global value chains.
Effectiveness:
Productivity Improvement:
Progress: The ‘Make in India’ program has spurred several initiatives to improve productivity through reforms in labor laws and ease of doing business.
Challenges: Despite some improvements, the manufacturing sector still faces issues with productivity due to infrastructure constraints, skills mismatch, and regulatory hurdles.
Integration with Global Value Chains:
Progress: The initiative attracted foreign direct investment (FDI) and led to the establishment of manufacturing hubs in various sectors, including electronics and automotive.
Challenges: Integration with global value chains has been gradual. India still faces challenges related to logistics, regulatory bottlenecks, and quality standards that limit deeper integration.
Job Creation:
Progress: The program contributed to job creation, particularly in sectors such as electronics, textiles, and automotive.
Challenges: The creation of high-quality jobs has been uneven, with some sectors seeing more substantial employment growth than others. Skills mismatch remains a significant issue.
2. National Manufacturing Policy
Objectives:
Increase the Sector’s Contribution to GDP: Target a 25% share of GDP from manufacturing.
Promote Investment: Encourage both domestic and foreign investments.
Foster Innovation: Support research and development and technological advancement.
Effectiveness:
Productivity Improvement:
Progress: The policy aimed to address productivity issues by promoting technological upgradation and infrastructure development through schemes like the Modified Special Incentive Package Scheme (M-SIPS).
Challenges: While there have been improvements, many manufacturing units, especially small and medium enterprises (SMEs), continue to struggle with outdated technology and low productivity levels.
Integration with Global Value Chains:
Progress: The policy has encouraged partnerships and investments that help integrate Indian manufacturing with global supply chains. Initiatives like the development of industrial corridors (e.g., Delhi-Mumbai Industrial Corridor) support this integration.
Challenges: Despite these efforts, India still faces significant barriers, including infrastructure deficits, complex regulatory environments, and limited domestic technological capabilities.
Job Creation:
Progress: The policy has supported the creation of jobs through various schemes and incentives aimed at expanding industrial capacity and promoting new industries.
Challenges: The anticipated job growth has not always met expectations. The sector often faces a mismatch between the skills provided by educational institutions and those demanded by employers, affecting job quality and creation.
Overall Evaluation
Successes:
Both initiatives have contributed to increased investment in the manufacturing sector and some improvements in productivity and job creation.
The ‘Make in India’ program has successfully attracted significant foreign investment and enhanced India’s global manufacturing profile.
The National Manufacturing Policy has laid down a framework for growth and improvement, focusing on infrastructure and technological advancement.
Areas for Improvement:
Addressing productivity issues requires more robust support for technology adoption and skill development.
See lessGreater efforts are needed to overcome infrastructure and regulatory challenges to better integrate with global value chains.
Enhanced focus on skill development and vocational training is crucial to improving job quality and addressing the employment challenges in the manufacturing sector.
In summary, while the ‘Make in India’ program and the National Manufacturing Policy have had positive impacts, addressing the remaining challenges will require sustained and targeted efforts to fully realize their objectives and enhance the sector’s contribution to the economy.
Analyze the impact of the major economic reforms initiated in the early 1990s, such as the liberalization of the industrial sector, the opening up of the economy to foreign investment, and the privatization of public sector enterprises, on the overall economic growth and development of India.
The major economic reforms initiated in India in the early 1990s had a profound and multifaceted impact on the country’s economic growth and development. Here’s a detailed analysis: 1. Liberalization of the Industrial Sector Impact: Increased Competition: The liberalization policies, which includedRead more
The major economic reforms initiated in India in the early 1990s had a profound and multifaceted impact on the country’s economic growth and development. Here’s a detailed analysis:
1. Liberalization of the Industrial Sector
Impact:
2. Opening Up the Economy to Foreign Investment
Impact:
3. Privatization of Public Sector Enterprises
Impact:
Overall Economic Growth and Development
Conclusion
The economic reforms of the early 1990s were instrumental in transforming India’s economy. They facilitated a shift from a controlled and bureaucratic system to a more open, market-driven economy. While the reforms yielded substantial benefits in terms of growth and development, they also highlighted the need for continued efforts to address socio-economic inequalities and ensure inclusive development.
See lessProviding a brief background on the economic crisis facing India in 1991, enumerate the key measures that were taken to mitigate the crisis.
In 1991, India met with an economic crisis relating to its external debt the government was not able to make repayments on its borrowings from abroad. The immediate pressing concerns facing the Indian economy in the beginning of the nineties included the following: Fiscal Indiscipline: Nearly all thRead more
In 1991, India met with an economic crisis relating to its external debt the government was not able to make repayments on its borrowings from abroad. The immediate pressing concerns facing the Indian economy in the beginning of the nineties included the following:
The problem areas lay with policies like the system of licensing, government control over key industries, restrictions on use of foreign technology and foreign investment and protectionist measures against competition. In this context, several key reforms were initiated, which included: Industrial Policy Changes:
Trade and Foreign Exchange Policy Changes:
Fiscal Policy Changes:
See lessEvaluate the government's policies and measures to enhance the financial inclusion and access to credit, particularly for the marginalized sections of the population, such as the Jan Dhan Yojana, the Pradhan Mantri Mudra Yojana, and the expansion of the banking and microfinance networks, and assess their impact on improving financial security and entrepreneurship.
The Indian government has implemented several key policies and measures aimed at enhancing financial inclusion and access to credit, particularly for marginalized sections of the population. Let's evaluate some of these initiatives and their impact: 1. Jan Dhan Yojana: Objective: The Pradhan MantriRead more
The Indian government has implemented several key policies and measures aimed at enhancing financial inclusion and access to credit, particularly for marginalized sections of the population. Let’s evaluate some of these initiatives and their impact:
1. Jan Dhan Yojana:
Objective: The Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana (PMJDY), launched in 2014, aimed to provide financial services such as savings accounts, remittances, credit, insurance, and pension to the unbanked population.
Impact:
Increased Financial Inclusion: By 2023, over 43 crore Jan Dhan accounts had been opened, significantly increasing the percentage of financially included households.
Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT): Enabled direct transfer of subsidies and benefits to beneficiaries, reducing leakages.
Access to Credit: Facilitated easier access to formal credit through overdraft facilities and micro-insurance.
2. Pradhan Mantri Mudra Yojana (PMMY):
Objective: Launched in 2015, PMMY aims to provide funding to micro and small enterprises by offering loans up to Rs. 10 lakh to non-corporate, non-farm small/micro enterprises.
Impact:
Enhanced Credit Access: PMMY has disbursed loans to millions of small entrepreneurs, promoting entrepreneurship and self-employment.
Job Creation: Supported the growth of small businesses, leading to employment generation, especially in rural and semi-urban areas.
Reduction in Informal Sector Borrowing: Reduced reliance on informal sources of credit which often charge exorbitant interest rates.
3. Expansion of Banking and Microfinance Networks:
Objective: The government has focused on expanding the reach of banking services and microfinance institutions (MFIs) to underserved areas.
Impact:
Increased Accessibility: Expansion of bank branches and BC (Business Correspondent) networks has brought banking services closer to rural and remote areas.
Microfinance Penetration: MFIs have played a crucial role in providing small loans and financial services to economically weaker sections, especially women and rural entrepreneurs.
Assessment of Impact on Financial Security and Entrepreneurship:
Financial Security: These initiatives have contributed significantly to enhancing financial security among marginalized populations by providing them with access to formal banking services, insurance, and pension schemes. This has reduced their vulnerability to economic shocks and enhanced their ability to save and invest.
Entrepreneurship: PMMY, in particular, has boosted entrepreneurship by providing timely and affordable credit to small businesses and startups. This has fostered a culture of entrepreneurship, especially in rural areas, leading to job creation and economic empowerment.
Challenges and Areas for Improvement:
Awareness and Education: Ensuring that beneficiaries understand the benefits and proper utilization of these services remains a challenge.
Sustainability: Continuous monitoring and support are essential to ensure the long-term sustainability of these initiatives and to prevent misuse or defaults.
Conclusion:
Overall, the government’s policies and measures such as Jan Dhan Yojana, PMMY, and the expansion of banking and microfinance networks have had a positive impact on improving financial security and fostering entrepreneurship among marginalized sections of the population in India. These initiatives have significantly contributed to inclusive economic growth and empowerment, although ongoing efforts are needed to address challenges and ensure sustainable outcomes.
See lessDiscuss the government's efforts to reform the agricultural sector, including the implementation of the new farm laws, the promotion of agribusiness and food processing, and the use of technology and innovation, and assess their impact on improving the income and livelihood of farmers.
India is a mixed economy where private sector works on principle of Laissez- Fair (Market forces decide the general price level in an economy) and Government works as a facilitator providing various schemes and policies on which private sector thrive. Before 1991 India had large public sector, closeRead more
India is a mixed economy where private sector works on principle of Laissez- Fair (Market forces decide the general price level in an economy) and Government works as a facilitator providing various schemes and policies on which private sector thrive. Before 1991 India had large public sector, closed economy , Red Tapism prevailed and certain sectors were reserved for Public sector like, Railways, Defense, Power etc. (17 in total) which led to inefficiency in economy and resulted in decline of foreign exchange reserve to a level it was difficult to even meet the import requirement of capital goods. So in order to resolve this crisis The government in leadership of Dr. Manmohan Singh introduced three measure namely:
In this way these reforms lead to rapid growth in Indian economy in period after 1991.
See lessThe economic reforms of 1991 were a comprehensive structural overhaul of the Indian economy Discuss.
The Balance of Payments crisis in 1991 and the subsequent rise in inflation forced India to adopt wide-ranging reforms, popularly known as Liberalization, Privatization, and Globalization (LPG). The economic reforms of 1991 were a comprehensive structural overhaul of the Indian economy: LiberalizatiRead more
The Balance of Payments crisis in 1991 and the subsequent rise in inflation forced India to adopt wide-ranging reforms, popularly known as Liberalization, Privatization, and Globalization (LPG).
The economic reforms of 1991 were a comprehensive structural overhaul of the Indian economy:
With these reforms, the focus now has shifted from the earlier ‘License-Permit-Quota’ regime towards a regime under which the government plays the role of a facilitator and enables the private sector to play a proactive role in driving the economic development of India.
See lessPlanned development was one of the key economic reforms undertaken in post-independence India. In this context, discuss why the Second Five-Year Plan is regarded as a milestone.
In the backdrop of partition and independence, India was mired in the stranglehold of issues like stagnating per capita national income, poorly developed industries, inadequate infrastructure, mass poverty, extreme unemployment and underemployment, etc. In this context, planned development emerged aRead more
In the backdrop of partition and independence, India was mired in the stranglehold of issues like stagnating per capita national income, poorly developed industries, inadequate infrastructure, mass poverty, extreme unemployment and underemployment, etc. In this context, planned development emerged as the key strategy of India’s developmental efforts. It provided for a systematic utilization of the available resources at a progressive rate on a national scale to achieve substantial progress on the socio-economic front. The era of planned development was ushered in with the launch of the First Five-Year Plan in April 1951 (the Harrod-Domar model), which addressed the problems arising from the massive influx of refugees, acute food shortage, and mounting inflation. However, it was the Second Five-Year Plan which is regarded as the milestone in the trajectory of planning. It was based on the Nehru-Mahalanobis strategy of development, which guided the planning practice for more than three decades until the end of the Seventh Five-Year Plan.
The significant contributions of the Second Five-Year Plan can be discussed as follows:
Endeavors towards setting up an elaborate system of controls and industrial licensing to allocate resources among industries as per the Plan requirements through the Industries Development and Regulation Act (IDRA) of 1951. The Nehru-Mahalanobis strategy of development, however, faced considerable criticism owing to its greater emphasis on industrialization compared to agriculture, due to which the latter suffered. Allocation of higher priority to heavy industries compared to labor-intensive industries also resulted in heavy concentration of wealth and large-scale unemployment. Further, it was argued that the objective of removal of poverty could not be achieved by growth itself. Nevertheless, the Second Five-Year Plan laid the bedrock for the basic physical and human infrastructure for comprehensive development in society going forward.
See less