Examine the Rajya Sabha’s proportional representation mechanism for selecting members of India’s upper house of parliament. Talk about the justification for this system, the standards used to assign seats, and the difficulties it presents for the legislative body’s accountability and ...
Model Answer The Representation of the People Act, 1951 (RPA, 1951) was designed to uphold the integrity of India's electoral system by addressing corrupt practices and ensuring free and fair elections. While it has played a pivotal role in strengthening the electoral framework, its effectiveness isRead more
Model Answer
The Representation of the People Act, 1951 (RPA, 1951) was designed to uphold the integrity of India’s electoral system by addressing corrupt practices and ensuring free and fair elections. While it has played a pivotal role in strengthening the electoral framework, its effectiveness is undermined by persistent corruption and evolving electoral malpractices.
Key Provisions and Achievements
The Act includes crucial provisions aimed at curbing corrupt practices:
- Bribery and Undue Influence: The RPA criminalizes offering gifts or inducing voters with promises to manipulate election results. It also prevents the use of threats or coercion to influence voter behavior.
- Appeals Based on Ascriptive Identities: The Act prohibits appeals based on religion, caste, or language, as demonstrated in the Abhiram Singh v. C.D. Commachen (2017) case, where the Supreme Court declared such appeals as corrupt practices.
- False Statements and Non-Disclosure: It forbids spreading false information about candidates or failing to disclose vital financial details, as seen in the Lok Prahari v. Union of India (2018) case.
These provisions have contributed significantly to maintaining election integrity and reducing certain corrupt practices.
Persistent Issues and Limitations
Despite the Act’s provisions, several corrupt practices remain prevalent:
- Vote Buying: Vote buying continues to be rampant, with the Election Commission reporting seizures worth over Rs 3,456 crore during the 2019 Lok Sabha elections.
- Political Violence: Violent incidents, like the 2021 Bengal election violence, highlight the ongoing threat of intimidation and coercion.
- Opaque Political Financing: Over 36% of political parties’ funding comes from “unknown” sources, as noted by the Association for Democratic Reforms, fostering corruption and policy capture.
- Emerging Threats: New challenges, such as the spread of fake news, hate speech, and misuse of electoral bonds, further complicate the electoral landscape. The use of micro-targeting through advanced data analytics also bypasses the provisions of the RPA, 1951.
Conclusion
While the Representation of the People Act, 1951 has made significant strides in improving India’s electoral system, its effectiveness is limited by emerging corrupt practices and the evolving digital landscape. To address these challenges, a comprehensive overhaul of the Act, incorporating stricter regulations on political financing, hate speech, and digital manipulation, is essential for strengthening electoral transparency and fairness.
See less
The system of proportional representation (PR) for the election of members to the Rajya Sabha, India's upper house of Parliament, is a complex and nuanced process. Here's an evaluation of the system, its rationale, criteria for seat allocation, and challenges it poses for representativeness and accoRead more
The system of proportional representation (PR) for the election of members to the Rajya Sabha, India’s upper house of Parliament, is a complex and nuanced process. Here’s an evaluation of the system, its rationale, criteria for seat allocation, and challenges it poses for representativeness and accountability:
Rationale:
The PR system was introduced in 1952 to ensure that smaller parties and regional groups have a voice in the Rajya Sabha. This was seen as a way to promote diversity and representation from various regions and communities.
Criteria for Seat Allocation:
The allocation of seats is based on the total number of votes polled by each party or alliance in the relevant state or union territory. The total number of seats is divided by the total number of valid votes cast, and the resulting quotient is used to determine the number of seats allocated to each party.
Challenges:
Representativeness: The PR system can lead to over-representation of smaller parties and under-representation of larger parties. This can result in a Rajya Sabha that does not accurately reflect the popular will.
Vote Split: The PR system can exacerbate vote splitting, where smaller parties divide the votes of a larger party, leading to wasted votes and potential instability.
Accountability: The PR system can make it challenging for voters to hold elected representatives accountable, as they may not be directly responsible for specific constituencies.
Complexity: The system can be complex and confusing for voters, making it difficult for them to understand how their votes are being translated into seats.
Malapportionment: The system can lead to malapportionment, where some states or regions have more seats than others, despite having similar populations.
Influence of Money: The PR system can make it easier for parties with deeper pockets to manipulate the electoral process and gain an advantage.
Potential Reforms:
Mixed-Member Proportional Representation (MMP): Consider adopting an MMP system, which combines elements of first-past-the-post voting with proportional representation.
See lessRegional Weightage: Introduce a regional weightage system to ensure that smaller states or regions have a greater say in the allocation of seats.
Voter-Weighted Proportional Representation: Implement a system where each voter’s vote carries a weighted value based on the population size of their state or region.
Simplification: Streamline the electoral process by simplifying the voting procedure and making it more transparent.
Electoral Reforms Commission: Establish an independent commission to review and recommend reforms to improve the electoral process and ensure greater representativeness and accountability.
In conclusion, while the PR system has its merits, it also poses significant challenges for representativeness and accountability. Reforming the system could lead to a more representative and effective Rajya Sabha that better reflects the diverse voices and concerns of Indian citizens.