Sign Up

Have an account?

Sign In

Don't have account,

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.


Have an account?

Sorry, you do not have permission to ask a question, You must login to ask a question.

Need An Account,

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Search
Ask A Question
Home/upsc: elections & representation of people’s act/Page 4

Mains Answer Writing Latest Questions

Kavita Singh
  • 0
Kavita SinghLearner
Asked: June 17, 2024In:
  • 0

Removing the right to vote from inmates is a violation of a deeply held democratic ideal that needs to be defended. Talk about it in the context of the 1951 Representation of the People Act. (250 words)

upsc: elections & representation of people’s act
  1. Kumkum Singh
    Kumkum Singh Begginer

    Answer: Post-independence, India adopted universal adult suffrage. This ensures that the interests of all citizens are taken care of while designing policies and programmes of the government besides ensuring 'political equality' - one of the goals enshrined in the Preamble to the Constitution of IndRead more

    Answer: Post-independence, India adopted universal adult suffrage. This ensures that the interests of all citizens are taken care of while designing policies and programmes of the government besides ensuring ‘political equality’ – one of the goals enshrined in the Preamble to the Constitution of India. However, Section 62(5) of the Representation of People’s Act, 1951 (RPA) denies the ‘right to vote‘ to anyone who is in prison whether convict or undertrial, or in lawful custody of police. As per NCRB 2016 data, nearly four lakh Indian citizens lodged in prison were denied the right to vote in the 2019 Lok Sabha elections. Reasons for not allowing prisoners to vote in elections:

    • Curtailment of rights akin to civil death: A person pronounced as an offender, infamous or outlaw, is denied many of the rights, including even some fundamental rights, enjoyed by free citizens. The right to vote, not being a fundamental right, is lawfully curtailed by a statute, i.e. Section 62(5) of the RPA, which is not a bad law on this account.
    • Resource crunch: Permitting every person in prison to vote would require deployment of a much larger police force and greater security arrangements.
    • Equality claims unjustified: Prisoners have broken the social contract and have voluntarily put themselves outside the social order and thus cannot claim equal freedom and rights.
    • Purity of election: To keep persons with criminal background away from the electoral process.
    • Responsibility of the Government: Government has an obligation to punish those who break laws.
    • Deterrent values: Not giving prisoners the right to vote also has, as a powerful moral symbolic value, which conveys that the society finds the convict’s behaviour to be unacceptable.

    In this context, following arguments can be made to allow prisoners to vote:

    • Outdated concept of civil death: This concept is outdated and the judiciary has recognized various rights even to convicted prisoners from time to time, like the right to life under Article 21.
    • Double punishment: India’s judicial pronouncement on prisoners’ rights have long stated that a prisoner retains all rights enjoyed by free citizens except those lost necessarily as an incident of confinement.
    • International practices: In most countries around the world, the restrictions on prisoners ‘right to vote is restricted to “convicts”, while those undergoing trial and detainees are eligible. There is a broad consensus that undertrials and detainees who have not yet been proven tohave broken any law as per the court should have the right to vote.
    • Laws are temporal: Laws are changed with different governments, while rights have been enshrined as fundamental. A crime, today, might be legal tomorrow. Hence, a right as fundamental as the right to vote, should not be dependent on the status of imprisonment or conviction.
    • Undermines the democratic polity: The vote of each and every citizen is a badge of dignity and of personhood. Quite literally, it says that everybody counts in a democracy.
    • Rehabilitative approach: Such a deprivation is not required as part of Indian penal system because the aim of imprisonment is to continue a prisoner’s interest in civil life inculcating a sense of responsibility towards his/her eventual return to the society as a “law-abiding” and “self-supporting” citizen.

    A citizen without a vote in a democracy has no existence. This is evident from the fact that election manifestos barely mention any promises for the betterment of prison conditions or legislation. Thus, the blanket ban on voting rights of all prisoners must be removed in India by first allowing undertrials to vote in elections and gradually moving towards allowing all prisoners the right to vote.

    See less
Dhruv Kapoor
  • 0
Dhruv KapoorLearner
Asked: July 16, 2024In:
  • 0

Examine the Rajya Sabha’s proportional representation mechanism for selecting members of India’s upper house of parliament. Talk about the justification for this system, the standards used to assign seats, and the difficulties it presents for the legislative body’s accountability and ...

upsc: elections & representation of people’s act
  1. Bahadur Pandit
    Bahadur Pandit Begginer

    The system of proportional representation (PR) for the election of members to the Rajya Sabha, India's upper house of Parliament, is a complex and nuanced process. Here's an evaluation of the system, its rationale, criteria for seat allocation, and challenges it poses for representativeness and accoRead more

    The system of proportional representation (PR) for the election of members to the Rajya Sabha, India’s upper house of Parliament, is a complex and nuanced process. Here’s an evaluation of the system, its rationale, criteria for seat allocation, and challenges it poses for representativeness and accountability:

    Rationale:
    The PR system was introduced in 1952 to ensure that smaller parties and regional groups have a voice in the Rajya Sabha. This was seen as a way to promote diversity and representation from various regions and communities.

    Criteria for Seat Allocation:
    The allocation of seats is based on the total number of votes polled by each party or alliance in the relevant state or union territory. The total number of seats is divided by the total number of valid votes cast, and the resulting quotient is used to determine the number of seats allocated to each party.

    Challenges:

    Representativeness: The PR system can lead to over-representation of smaller parties and under-representation of larger parties. This can result in a Rajya Sabha that does not accurately reflect the popular will.
    Vote Split: The PR system can exacerbate vote splitting, where smaller parties divide the votes of a larger party, leading to wasted votes and potential instability.
    Accountability: The PR system can make it challenging for voters to hold elected representatives accountable, as they may not be directly responsible for specific constituencies.
    Complexity: The system can be complex and confusing for voters, making it difficult for them to understand how their votes are being translated into seats.
    Malapportionment: The system can lead to malapportionment, where some states or regions have more seats than others, despite having similar populations.
    Influence of Money: The PR system can make it easier for parties with deeper pockets to manipulate the electoral process and gain an advantage.
    Potential Reforms:

    Mixed-Member Proportional Representation (MMP): Consider adopting an MMP system, which combines elements of first-past-the-post voting with proportional representation.
    Regional Weightage: Introduce a regional weightage system to ensure that smaller states or regions have a greater say in the allocation of seats.
    Voter-Weighted Proportional Representation: Implement a system where each voter’s vote carries a weighted value based on the population size of their state or region.
    Simplification: Streamline the electoral process by simplifying the voting procedure and making it more transparent.
    Electoral Reforms Commission: Establish an independent commission to review and recommend reforms to improve the electoral process and ensure greater representativeness and accountability.
    In conclusion, while the PR system has its merits, it also poses significant challenges for representativeness and accountability. Reforming the system could lead to a more representative and effective Rajya Sabha that better reflects the diverse voices and concerns of Indian citizens.

    See less
Dhruv Kapoor
  • 0
Dhruv KapoorLearner
Asked: July 16, 2024In:
  • 0

Examine the steps the government and Election Commission have taken to guarantee the safety and orderly conduct of the country’s elections. Talk about the difficulties caused by voter intimidation, electoral violence, and the role that law enforcement plays in preserving ...

upsc: elections & representation of people’s act
  1. Bahadur Pandit
    Bahadur Pandit Begginer

    The Election Commission of India (ECI) and the government have taken several measures to ensure the security and peaceful conduct of elections in India. However, despite these efforts, electoral violence, voter intimidation, and law and order issues continue to pose significant challenges. MeasuresRead more

    The Election Commission of India (ECI) and the government have taken several measures to ensure the security and peaceful conduct of elections in India. However, despite these efforts, electoral violence, voter intimidation, and law and order issues continue to pose significant challenges.

    Measures taken by the ECI:

    Security Arrangements: The ECI deploys security personnel, including paramilitary forces, to ensure the safety of voters, candidates, and election officials.
    Polling Station Security: Each polling station is secured with a minimum of 5-7 personnel, including police and Central Armed Police Forces (CAPF) personnel.
    Voter Verification: The ECI uses various methods to verify the identity of voters, including biometric authentication, to prevent impersonation and voting fraud.
    Election Observers: The ECI deploys observers from political parties, civil society organizations, and independent organizations to monitor the electoral process.
    Voter Education: The ECI conducts voter education campaigns to raise awareness about the importance of voting and the need for peaceful conduct during elections.
    Measures taken by the government:

    deployment of Central Forces: The government deploys CAPF personnel to assist state police forces in maintaining law and order during elections.
    Intelligence Gathering: Intelligence agencies gather information on potential troublemakers and take necessary action to prevent violence and intimidation.
    Enhanced Security Measures: The government increases security measures at sensitive polling stations, including deploying additional personnel and equipment.
    Emergency Response Plan: The government has an emergency response plan in place to respond quickly to any incidents of violence or unrest.
    Challenges posed by electoral violence:

    Intimidation of Voters: Intimidation of voters can lead to a decrease in voter turnout and undermine the credibility of the electoral process.
    Violence against Women and Minorities: Women and minority communities are often targeted during elections, leading to a sense of fear and insecurity.
    Police Brutality: In some cases, police personnel may use excessive force or commit human rights abuses during elections, which can further exacerbate tensions.
    Role of law enforcement agencies:

    Maintaining Order: Law enforcement agencies are responsible for maintaining order during elections and ensuring that all individuals are able to exercise their right to vote peacefully.
    Preventing Violence: Law enforcement agencies must prevent violence and intimidation by monitoring hotspots and taking swift action against perpetrators.
    Protecting Vulnerable Groups: Law enforcement agencies must take special care to protect vulnerable groups, such as women and minorities, from violence and intimidation.
    Despite these measures, electoral violence remains a significant challenge in India’s electoral process. To address this issue, it is essential for the ECI and the government to:

    Strengthen Electoral Laws: Enact stricter laws to punish those involved in electoral violence and intimidation.
    Enhance Voter Education: Conduct more effective voter education campaigns to promote peaceful conduct during elections.
    Improve Intelligence Gathering: Enhance intelligence gathering capabilities to identify potential troublemakers and take proactive measures to prevent violence.
    Strengthen Accountability Mechanisms: Establish effective accountability mechanisms to ensure that those responsible for electoral violence are held accountable.
    Ultimately, ensuring the security and peaceful conduct of elections requires a coordinated effort from all stakeholders, including the ECI, the government, law enforcement agencies, political parties, and civil society organizations.

    See less
Meena Mehara
  • 0
Meena MeharaLearner
Asked: July 16, 2024In:
  • 0

Examine India’s system of adult universal suffrage. Examine the steps implemented to guarantee that the voting process is inclusive and accessible, especially for underrepresented populations including women, minorities, and people with disabilities. Examine how other democratic nations handle voting rights ...

upsc: elections & representation of people’s act
  1. Bahadur Pandit
    Bahadur Pandit Begginer

    India's system of universal adult suffrage is enshrined in Article 326 of the Constitution, which provides that all citizens aged 18 and above are entitled to vote. To ensure the inclusivity and accessibility of the electoral process, the Election Commission of India (ECI) has taken several measuresRead more

    India’s system of universal adult suffrage is enshrined in Article 326 of the Constitution, which provides that all citizens aged 18 and above are entitled to vote. To ensure the inclusivity and accessibility of the electoral process, the Election Commission of India (ECI) has taken several measures, particularly for marginalized groups such as women, minorities, and persons with disabilities.

    Measures taken:

    Voter Registration: The ECI has implemented various measures to increase voter registration, including:
    Online voter registration: The ECI has introduced an online portal for voter registration, making it easier for citizens to register.
    Door-to-door verification: The ECI conducts door-to-door verification to ensure that eligible voters are enrolled in the electoral rolls.
    Accessibility: Efforts have been made to make polling stations accessible to all:
    Accessible polling stations: The ECI has identified and designated accessible polling stations for voters with disabilities.
    Sign language interpretation: The ECI provides sign language interpretation at polling stations to assist voters with hearing impairments.
    Inclusive Campaigning: The ECI has promoted inclusive campaigning by:
    Prohibiting hate speech and hate propaganda: The ECI has prohibited hate speech and hate propaganda during elections, promoting a peaceful and respectful campaign environment.
    Encouraging women’s participation: The ECI has encouraged women’s participation in politics through reserved seats, gender-sensitive polling stations, and awareness campaigns.
    Voting Accessibility: Efforts have been made to ensure voting accessibility:
    Braille ballots: The ECI provides Braille ballots for voters with visual impairments.
    Tactile voting machines: Some states have introduced tactile voting machines for voters with visual impairments.
    Voter Education: The ECI has launched various initiatives to educate voters about the electoral process:
    Awareness campaigns: The ECI conducts awareness campaigns through print, electronic, and social media to educate voters about their rights and responsibilities.
    Voter education pamphlets: The ECI distributes voter education pamphlets in multiple languages to ensure that all voters are informed.
    Comparison with other democratic countries:

    United States:
    Voter ID laws: Some states in the US have voter ID laws, which have been criticized for disenfranchising marginalized communities.
    Voter suppression tactics: There have been reports of voter suppression tactics, such as gerrymandering and voter roll purges, targeting marginalized communities.
    United Kingdom:
    Compulsory voting: The UK has a system of compulsory voting, which aims to increase voter turnout.
    Accessibility measures: The UK has implemented measures such as audio-visual aids and braille ballots to increase accessibility for voters with disabilities.
    Canada:
    Voter ID laws: Canada does not have national voter ID laws, but some provinces have introduced their own ID requirements.
    Accessibility measures: Canada has implemented measures such as audio-visual aids and accessible polling stations to increase accessibility for voters with disabilities.
    In conclusion, India’s system of universal adult suffrage has made significant progress in ensuring inclusivity and accessibility for marginalized groups. While there is still room for improvement, the ECI’s efforts have increased voter registration, improved accessibility at polling stations, and promoted inclusive campaigning. India’s approach compares favorably with other democratic countries, which have also implemented measures to promote inclusivity and accessibility in their electoral processes.

    See less
Jai Agarwal
  • 0
Jai AgarwalLearner
Asked: July 16, 2024In:
  • 0

Examine the steps taken by the government and the Election Commission to make voting more inclusive and accessible for underrepresented groups, including women, people of color, people with disabilities, and members of religious and ethnic minorities.

upsc: elections & representation of people’s act
  1. Parmanad Singh
    Parmanad Singh Begginer

    The Election Commission of India (ECI) and the government have taken several steps to improve the accessibility and inclusivity of the electoral process for marginalized communities. Here are some efforts made: Women: Reservation of seats: The Indian Constitution reserves 33% of seats for women in lRead more

    The Election Commission of India (ECI) and the government have taken several steps to improve the accessibility and inclusivity of the electoral process for marginalized communities. Here are some efforts made:

    Women:

    Reservation of seats: The Indian Constitution reserves 33% of seats for women in local self-government bodies, ensuring greater representation.
    Sops and incentives: The government offers subsidies and incentives to women candidates to encourage them to contest elections.
    Female voters’ facilitation: The ECI provides separate queues, polling stations, and transportation facilities for women voters, especially in rural areas.
    Awareness campaigns: Public awareness campaigns are conducted to educate women about the importance of voting and their rights.
    Religious and ethnic minorities:

    Special arrangements: The ECI makes special arrangements for minorities, such as providing interpreters or accommodating religious dietary requirements.
    Reservations: The government has reservations for minority communities in government jobs, education, and other sectors.
    Cultural sensitivity: The ECI ensures that polling stations are located in accessible locations and respects cultural sensitivities during elections.
    Persons with Disabilities:

    Accessible polling stations: The ECI ensures that polling stations are made accessible to people with disabilities, with facilities like ramps, Braille ballots, and audio ballots.
    Special arrangements: The ECI makes special arrangements for voters with disabilities, such as providing sign language interpreters or assistance with voting.
    Awareness campaigns: Public awareness campaigns are conducted to educate people with disabilities about their rights and the accessibility features available during elections.
    Other efforts:

    Voter registration drives: The ECI conducts voter registration drives in rural areas, especially among marginalized communities.
    Election literacy programs: The ECI conducts election literacy programs to educate citizens about the electoral process, voting rights, and the importance of casting their votes.
    Dispute resolution mechanisms: The ECI has established dispute resolution mechanisms to address complaints and grievances related to electoral processes.
    Challenges:

    Lack of resources: Limited resources may hinder the effective implementation of these initiatives.
    Limited awareness: Many marginalized communities may not be aware of their rights or the initiatives available to them.
    Bureaucratic hurdles: Bureaucratic hurdles and red tape can delay or hinder the implementation of these initiatives.
    Evaluation:

    The efforts made by the ECI and the government have improved accessibility and inclusivity for marginalized communities to some extent. However, more needs to be done to address the challenges faced by these communities. To further improve the electoral process:

    Increased funding: Increase funding for initiatives aimed at improving accessibility and inclusivity.
    Public awareness campaigns: Conduct targeted public awareness campaigns to educate marginalized communities about their rights and the initiatives available to them.
    Strengthening dispute resolution mechanisms: Strengthen dispute resolution mechanisms to ensure timely and effective redressal of grievances related to electoral processes.
    Inclusive policy-making: Involve marginalized communities in policy-making processes to ensure that their needs and concerns are addressed.
    By addressing these challenges and strengthening these initiatives, India can further improve the accessibility and inclusivity of its electoral process, ensuring greater representation and participation from marginalized communities.

    See less
Mansi Gautam
  • 0
Mansi GautamLearner
Asked: July 16, 2024In:
  • 0

Talk about the rules governing political party registration and recognition in India. Analyze the standards for national and state party recognition, the prerequisites for running for office, and the effects of party recognition on electoral fairness and political representation.

upsc: elections & representation of people’s act
  1. Vihaan Nair
    Vihaan Nair Learner

    In India, political parties are required to register with the Election Commission of India (ECI) to participate in elections. Let's discuss the provisions for the registration and recognition of political parties, including the criteria for national and state party status, the requirements for conteRead more

    In India, political parties are required to register with the Election Commission of India (ECI) to participate in elections. Let’s discuss the provisions for the registration and recognition of political parties, including the criteria for national and state party status, the requirements for contesting elections, and the implications of party recognition on political representation and the fairness of the electoral system.

    Registration of Political Parties:
    To register a political party in India, the following provisions apply:
    a. Application Process: Parties need to submit an application to the ECI, along with the required documents, including a copy of the party’s constitution, membership details, organizational structure, and financial information.

    b. Eligibility Criteria: The party should have a minimum of 100 members who are registered voters. It should not advocate discrimination based on religion, race, caste, sex, or language. The party’s name should not resemble the name of an existing party.

    c. Scrutiny and Decision: The ECI examines the application and verifies the information provided. If the ECI finds the application satisfactory and compliant with the guidelines, the party is registered and included in the ECI’s list of political parties.

    Recognition as a National or State Party:
    Recognition as a national or state party brings certain privileges and benefits. The criteria for recognition are as follows:
    a. National Party:
    i. Securing at least 6% of the valid votes polled in any four or more states in a Lok Sabha (lower house of Parliament) or State Legislative Assembly election, and winning at least four seats in the Lok Sabha from any state or states.
    OR
    ii. Winning at least 2% of the seats in the Lok Sabha from at least three different states in a general election.
    OR
    iii. Being recognized as a state party in at least four states.

    b. State Party:
    A party is recognized as a state party in a particular state if it fulfills any of the following criteria:
    i. Securing at least 6% of the valid votes polled in that state in a general election to the State Legislative Assembly.
    OR
    ii. Winning at least two seats in a general election to the State Legislative Assembly.
    OR
    iii. Winning at least 3% of the total seats in the State Legislative Assembly.

    Requirements for Contesting Elections:
    To contest elections, political parties must fulfill specific requirements, including fielding a certain number of candidates and depositing a security amount. The number of candidates and the amount of security deposit vary based on the type of election.
    Implications of Party Recognition on Political Representation and Fairness:
    a. Political Representation: Recognition as a national or state party provides parties with certain privileges, such as access to reserved election symbols, party-specific broadcast time on state-owned media, and financial assistance from the ECI. This recognition enhances the visibility and credibility of parties, facilitating their participation in the democratic process and representation of diverse interests.
    b. Fairness of the Electoral System: The recognition criteria ensure that only parties with significant public support and a presence in multiple states or at the national level are granted special privileges. This promotes fairness in the electoral system by preventing undue advantage to smaller or non-serious parties. However, the criteria may also pose entry barriers for emerging parties, potentially limiting political competition and representation.

    It is important to note that while recognition as a national or state party confers certain benefits, it does not guarantee electoral success. Parties must still garner public support and secure votes to win seats and be represented in legislative bodies.

    In conclusion, political parties in India need to register with the Election Commission of India, and recognition as a national or state party is subject to specific criteria. Party recognition has implications for political representation and the fairness of the electoral system. While it ensures visibility and privileges for recognized parties, it also sets thresholds that may impact the entry of new parties into the political arena. Balancing the need for fair representation and encouraging political competition remains a continuous endeavor in India’s electoral system.

    See less
Nitu Singh
  • 0
Nitu SinghBegginer
Asked: July 16, 2024In:
  • 0

Examine how force and money have an impact on elections in India. Talk about the problems of vote-buying, the use of unreported money, and the influence of criminals on elections. Analyze the steps done to address these issues and preserve ...

upsc: elections & representation of people’s act
  1. Parmanad Singh
    Parmanad Singh Begginer

    The role of money and muscle power in Indian elections is a significant challenge to the integrity of the democratic system. Money and muscle power can influence the outcome of elections through various means, including: Vote-Buying: Candidates or political parties may offer money, gifts, or other iRead more

    The role of money and muscle power in Indian elections is a significant challenge to the integrity of the democratic system. Money and muscle power can influence the outcome of elections through various means, including:

    Vote-Buying: Candidates or political parties may offer money, gifts, or other inducements to voters in exchange for their votes.
    Unaccounted Wealth: Candidates or parties may use unaccounted wealth to fund their campaigns, making it difficult to track and audit their expenses.
    Criminal Elements: Criminal elements, including mafia groups and gangs, may use violence, intimidation, and bribery to influence the electoral process.
    Consequences:

    Undermining Democracy: The involvement of money and muscle power can undermine the democratic process by favoring candidates with financial resources over those who are more deserving but less well-funded.
    Corruption: The use of unaccounted wealth can lead to corruption, as funds may be misused for personal gain or to bribe officials.
    Violence and Intimidation: The involvement of criminal elements can lead to violence and intimidation, making it difficult for people to exercise their right to vote.
    Measures taken to address these challenges:

    Election Expenditure Monitoring: The Election Commission of India (ECI) monitors election expenditure to ensure compliance with campaign finance laws.
    Pollachi Inquiry Commission: The ECI has established the Pollachi Inquiry Commission to investigate allegations of electoral malpractices, including vote-buying and the use of unaccounted wealth.
    Use of Technology: The ECI has introduced measures such as Voter-Verified Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) and Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) to reduce the scope for tampering with the electoral process.
    Criminalization of Electoral Offences: The ECI has criminalized electoral offences, such as bribery and booth capturing, making it a criminal offense punishable by law.
    Anti-Corruption Laws: India has anti-corruption laws in place, such as the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, which prohibits bribery and other forms of corruption.
    Civil Society Initiatives: Civil society organizations have launched initiatives to promote transparency and accountability in elections, such as monitoring election expenditure and exposing instances of corruption.
    Challenges:

    Lack of Resources: The ECI faces challenges in enforcing its regulations due to limited resources, including inadequate funding and personnel.
    Corruption within Political Parties: Political parties themselves may be involved in corrupt practices, making it difficult to address the issue effectively.
    Lack of Public Awareness: Many voters may not be aware of the consequences of money and muscle power in elections, making it difficult to mobilize public support for change.
    To address these challenges, it is essential to:

    Strengthen Election Expenditure Monitoring: The ECI should strengthen its expenditure monitoring mechanisms to ensure compliance with campaign finance laws.
    Improve Public Awareness: Public awareness campaigns can help educate voters about the importance of transparency and accountability in elections.
    Hold Political Parties Accountable: Political parties should be held accountable for any corrupt practices, and parties found guilty should face consequences.
    Strengthen Anti-Corruption Laws: India’s anti-corruption laws should be strengthened to prevent bribery and other forms of corruption during elections.
    In conclusion, while the ECI has taken steps to address the issues of money and muscle power in Indian elections, there is still much work to be done to ensure the integrity of the democratic system. It is essential to strengthen election expenditure monitoring, improve public awareness, hold political parties accountable, and strengthen anti-corruption laws to prevent corrupt practices during elections.

    See less
Pankaj Gautam
  • 0
Pankaj GautamLearner
Asked: July 16, 2024In:
  • 0

Examine the clauses pertaining to the control of candidates and political parties in Indian elections. Talk about the procedures for party registration and recognition, the standards for assigning election emblems, and the steps taken to guarantee fairness for all political ...

upsc: elections & representation of people’s act
  1. Goluram Singh
    Goluram Singh Begginer

    The Indian electoral system has a complex set of provisions for the regulation of political parties and candidates, aimed at ensuring the integrity and transparency of the electoral process. Here's an analysis of the key provisions: **Registration and Recognition of Parties:** 1. **Registration:** PRead more

    The Indian electoral system has a complex set of provisions for the regulation of political parties and candidates, aimed at ensuring the integrity and transparency of the electoral process. Here’s an analysis of the key provisions:

    **Registration and Recognition of Parties:**

    1. **Registration:** Political parties must register with the Election Commission of India (ECI) to participate in elections.
    2. **Criteria:** To register, parties must submit an application, provide their constitution, and satisfy the ECI that they are a political party with a defined ideology and a minimum number of members (10,000 in the case of national parties).
    3. **Recognition:** Recognized parties enjoy special privileges, such as:
    * Allocation of election symbols
    * Inclusion in the general category for allocation of television time during elections
    * Exemption from filing security deposits

    **Allocation of Election Symbols:**

    1. **Symbol allocation:** The ECI allocates symbols to recognized parties, ensuring that each party has a unique symbol.
    2. **Criteria:** The ECI considers factors such as the party’s popularity, its representation in Parliament or State Legislatures, and its performance in previous elections.
    3. **Reservation of symbols:** The ECI reserves certain symbols for recognized parties, ensuring that new parties do not use them.

    **Measures to Ensure a Level Playing Field:**

    1. **Funding:** The ECI regulates party funding through donations and spending limits to prevent large-scale corruption.
    2. **Filing fees:** Candidates must pay a fee (Rs. 25,000 for Lok Sabha and Rs. 15,000 for Assembly seats) to contest elections.
    3. **Spending limits:** Candidates have spending limits (Rs. 70 lakhs for Lok Sabha and Rs. 28 lakhs for Assembly seats) to prevent excessive spending.
    4. **Code of Conduct:** The ECI enforces a code of conduct for all political parties and candidates, prohibiting certain activities like bribery, intimidation, and misuse of government resources.
    5. **Election observers:** Domestic and international observers are deployed to monitor elections and report on any irregularities.

    **Challenges and Limitations:**

    1. **Parties’ financial resources:** Wealthy parties may still have an unfair advantage due to their financial resources.
    2. **Inequitable media access:** Large parties may receive more media attention due to their existing popularity or connections.
    3. **Voter education:** Effective voter education programs can help level the playing field by increasing awareness about party platforms and policies.
    4. **Election Commission’s powers:** The ECI’s ability to enforce regulations can be limited by political interference or inadequate resources.

    In conclusion, the provisions for regulating political parties and candidates in Indian elections aim to ensure a level playing field by promoting transparency, accountability, and equality. While these measures have improved the electoral process over time, there is still room for refinement to address ongoing challenges and limitations.

    See less
Sujata Gautam
  • 0
Sujata GautamBegginer
Asked: July 16, 2024In:
  • 0

Talk about the electoral rules and laws that control campaign funding in India. Analyze the steps done to maintain accountability and openness, such as disclosing contributions and expenses. Analyze how well these steps are working to limit the influence of ...

upsc: elections & representation of people’s act
  1. Bahadur Pandit
    Bahadur Pandit Begginer

    The electoral laws and regulations governing campaign finance in India are primarily governed by the Representation of the People Act, 1951, the Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968, and the Election Commission of India's (ECI) guidelines. The key provisions related to campaign fRead more

    The electoral laws and regulations governing campaign finance in India are primarily governed by the Representation of the People Act, 1951, the Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968, and the Election Commission of India’s (ECI) guidelines. The key provisions related to campaign finance are:

    Prohibition on Corporate Funding: The Representation of the People Act, 1951, prohibits companies from donating to political parties or candidates.
    Contribution Limits: The Act sets limits on individual contributions to political parties or candidates.
    Disclosure of Contributions: Political parties and candidates are required to disclose the sources of their funds and the amounts received.
    Expenditure Limits: The ECI sets expenditure limits for political parties and candidates.
    Disclosure of Expenditures: Political parties and candidates must disclose their expenditures.
    Measures taken to ensure transparency and accountability:

    Electoral Bonds: The ECI introduced electoral bonds in 2017 to increase transparency in political funding. The bonds can be purchased anonymously, but the donor’s identity is not disclosed.
    Electoral Surplus Account: Political parties must maintain an electoral surplus account to deposit excess funds collected during elections.
    Audit of Accounts: Political parties’ accounts are audited annually by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG).
    Online Disclosure: Political parties and candidates are required to disclose their financial information online.
    Effectiveness in controlling the influence of money in elections:

    Anonymity: The electoral bond scheme allows anonymous funding, which can lead to unaccountable funding and potential money laundering.
    Limited Transparency: While some information is disclosed, it may not be sufficient to ensure full transparency, as some donors may remain anonymous.
    Inadequate Enforcement: There is a lack of effective enforcement mechanisms to ensure compliance with campaign finance regulations.
    Limited Expenditure Monitoring: It is challenging for authorities to monitor expenditures effectively, particularly in rural areas where resources may be limited.
    Corruption: Corruption among political party officials and election officials can undermine the effectiveness of campaign finance regulations.
    Challenges:

    Political Party Funding: Political parties often rely heavily on undisclosed funding sources, making it difficult to track the origin of funds.
    Donor Confidentiality: The electoral bond scheme provides donor confidentiality, which can create an environment conducive to corruption.
    Lack of Public Awareness: Voters may not be aware of the impact of campaign finance on elections, making it challenging to hold politicians accountable.
    Limited Resources: Election authorities may not have sufficient resources to effectively monitor campaign finance regulations.
    To improve the effectiveness of campaign finance regulations, India could consider:

    Strengthening enforcement mechanisms
    Increasing transparency through more comprehensive disclosure requirements
    Implementing stricter limits on campaign financing
    Enhancing public awareness about campaign finance issues
    Improving access to information for voters
    By addressing these challenges and strengthening campaign finance regulations, India can work towards reducing the influence of money in elections and promoting a more transparent and accountable democratic system.

    See less
Sujata Gautam
  • 0
Sujata GautamBegginer
Asked: July 16, 2024In:
  • 0

Examine and evaluate the Representation of the People Act’s proportional representation system for selecting Rajya Sabha members. Talk about the justification for this system, the standards used to assign seats, and the difficulties it presents for the legislative body’s accountability ...

upsc: elections & representation of people’s act
  1. Vihaan Nair
    Vihaan Nair Learner

    The system of proportional representation for the election of members to the Rajya Sabha, the upper house of the Parliament of India, is outlined in the Representation of the People Act. Let's analyze this system, including the rationale behind it, the criteria for seat allocation, and the challengeRead more

    The system of proportional representation for the election of members to the Rajya Sabha, the upper house of the Parliament of India, is outlined in the Representation of the People Act. Let’s analyze this system, including the rationale behind it, the criteria for seat allocation, and the challenges it poses for the representativeness and accountability of the legislative body.

    Rationale behind Proportional Representation:
    The rationale behind adopting proportional representation for the Rajya Sabha is to ensure that the composition of the house reflects the political diversity and regional interests of the states in India. It aims to provide a platform for states to have their voices heard at the national level and promote federalism.
    Criteria for Seat Allocation:
    a. State Representation: The Rajya Sabha consists of members elected by the members of State Legislative Assemblies (SLAs). The number of seats allocated to each state is determined based on its population and other factors such as area, revenue, and special needs.
    b. Quota System: Each state has a fixed number of seats in the Rajya Sabha, and these seats are allocated proportionally among different political parties based on their representation in the SLAs. This ensures that parties with significant support in a state get representation in the Rajya Sabha.

    c. Single Transferable Vote: The election process for Rajya Sabha members follows the system of Single Transferable Vote (STV). Under this system, members of the SLAs cast their votes, and if a candidate obtains the required quota of votes, they are declared elected. If no candidate reaches the quota, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated, and their votes are transferred to the next preference marked by the voters.

    Challenges for Representativeness and Accountability:
    a. Indirect Election: The system of proportional representation in the Rajya Sabha involves an indirect election process where SLA members vote on behalf of the electorate. This can lead to a disconnect between voters and representatives, as citizens do not directly elect members to the upper house. It raises questions about the direct accountability of Rajya Sabha members to the public.
    b. Lack of Direct Regional Representation: While proportional representation ensures party representation based on the share of votes, it may not guarantee direct regional representation. The allocation of seats based on population and other factors may not fully capture the diverse regional interests and concerns of all states, particularly those with smaller populations.

    c. Influence of Party Leadership: The selection of candidates for Rajya Sabha elections is often influenced by party leadership. This can limit the autonomy of state legislators in choosing representatives based on regional or local interests. The party’s central leadership may prioritize political considerations over regional representation.

    d. Stability of Representation: Unlike the Lok Sabha (lower house), where representatives face direct elections at regular intervals, Rajya Sabha members have staggered terms. This can lead to a more stable composition of the house, which may limit the ability to reflect changing political dynamics and public sentiment.

    It is worth noting that the Rajya Sabha serves as a revising and deliberative chamber, and its role is distinct from the directly elected Lok Sabha. The system of proportional representation in the Rajya Sabha attempts to strike a balance between regional representation and party representation. However, the challenges it poses in terms of representativeness, accountability, and direct regional representation should be considered in ongoing discussions on electoral reforms to ensure an effective and responsive legislative system.

    See less
Load More Questions

Resources & Suggestions

Mains Answer Writing Latest Articles

On: April 18, 2025

Daily Answer Writing Practice Questions (18 April 2025)

Do you agree with the claim that indecision and risk aversion are prevalent issues in Indian bureaucracy? Support your answer with logical reasoning. (150 words) ऐसा कहा जाता है कि भारतीय नौकरशाही में अनिर्णय और जोखिम से बचने की प्रवृत्ति ...

On: April 18, 2025 Comments: 0

Strengthening India’s Cyber Defence

Rising Threats Digital Era Challenges: 2024 marks a significant rise in digital threats, particularly from AI and cyberattacks. Key Issues: Disinformation campaigns. Cyber fraud affecting daily life. Current Major Cyber Threats Ransomware Rampage: Over 48,000 instances of WannaCry ransomware detected ...

On: April 18, 2025 Comments: 0

भारत की साइबर सुरक्षा

बढ़ते खतरे कृत्रिम बुद्धिमत्ता (AI) और साइबर हमले: 2024 में AI और साइबर हमलों के खतरे में वृद्धि। महत्वपूर्ण अवसंरचना पर हमले: डिजिटल हमलों और दुष्प्रचार अभियानों की संभावना बढ़ी है। प्रमुख साइबर खतरें रैनसमवेयर का प्रकोप: 48,000 से अधिक ...

Explore Our Blog