Evaluate the significance and implications of the 42nd Amendment Act of 1976 in shaping India’s constitutional framework. Discuss its provisions, controversies surrounding its enactment, and its lasting impact on Indian politics and governance.
Home/indianpolitics
- Recent Questions
- Most Answered
- Answers
- No Answers
- Most Visited
- Most Voted
- Random
- Bump Question
- New Questions
- Sticky Questions
- Polls
- Followed Questions
- Favorite Questions
- Recent Questions With Time
- Most Answered With Time
- Answers With Time
- No Answers With Time
- Most Visited With Time
- Most Voted With Time
- Random With Time
- Bump Question With Time
- New Questions With Time
- Sticky Questions With Time
- Polls With Time
- Followed Questions With Time
- Favorite Questions With Time
The 42nd Amendment Act, of 1976, was often called a mini-constitution. It was a significant development of the Indian Constitution. This amendment was enacted on January 3, 1977. The aim of the 42nd Amendment was to strengthen the federal structure of the country and reduce the powers of the JudiciaRead more
The 42nd Amendment Act, of 1976, was often called a mini-constitution. It was a significant development of the Indian Constitution. This amendment was enacted on January 3, 1977. The aim of the 42nd Amendment was to strengthen the federal structure of the country and reduce the powers of the Judiciary. The key provisions of the amendment included:
The amendment was controversial due to its perceived attempt to undermine judicial review and limit civil liberties. Critics argued that it was an undemocratic move by the Indira Gandhi government to consolidate its power and suppress opposition. The amendment was passed through a joint session of Parliament, with support from the ruling party and some opposition parties. The 42nd Amendment had a profound impact on India’s federal structure. It significantly increased the power of the central government, reducing the autonomy of state governments. This shift emphasized a more unitary system, which some argued was against the federal nature of the nation.