Analyse the multidimensional challenges posed by external state and non–state actors to the internal security of India and discuss measures required to combat it effectively.
The Korean War (1950-1953) tested India's commitment to the principles of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), a policy of not aligning with any major power blocs. India, under Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru, pursued a diplomatic and neutral stance, emphasizing peaceful resolution and avoiding militaryRead more
The Korean War (1950-1953) tested India’s commitment to the principles of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), a policy of not aligning with any major power blocs. India, under Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru, pursued a diplomatic and neutral stance, emphasizing peaceful resolution and avoiding military alliances. India led efforts in the United Nations to mediate the conflict, advocating for ceasefire and negotiations between North and South Korea.
India’s role in the Neutral Nations Repatriation Commission, overseeing the exchange of prisoners of war, highlighted its impartial approach. Despite pressure from both the United States and the Soviet Union, India maintained its neutral stance, focusing on humanitarian aid and peacekeeping. This demonstrated India’s dedication to NAM principles, prioritizing peace and sovereignty over aligning with either superpower, thus reinforcing its identity as a leader in the movement and a proponent of global peace and stability.
See less
India faces multidimensional challenges to its internal security from both state and non-state actors. External state actors often engage in activities like cross-border terrorism, sponsoring insurgencies, and conducting cyber-attacks to destabilize the country. Non-state actors such as terrorist orRead more
India faces multidimensional challenges to its internal security from both state and non-state actors. External state actors often engage in activities like cross-border terrorism, sponsoring insurgencies, and conducting cyber-attacks to destabilize the country. Non-state actors such as terrorist organizations exploit porous borders and socio-economic disparities to carry out attacks, leading to internal unrest and threats to national unity.
To effectively combat these challenges, India needs a comprehensive approach. Strengthening border security through advanced surveillance technologies and better infrastructure is crucial. Intelligence agencies must enhance coordination and intelligence-sharing to preempt terrorist activities and dismantle their networks. Moreover, diplomatic efforts to isolate state sponsors of terrorism on international platforms are essential.
Additionally, addressing socio-economic disparities and grievances in vulnerable regions can reduce the appeal of extremist ideologies. Law enforcement agencies need modernization and specialized training to respond swiftly to security threats. Public awareness campaigns can foster community vigilance and cooperation in countering radicalization and terrorism.
Cybersecurity measures must be bolstered to protect critical infrastructure from cyber threats. International cooperation and agreements on counter-terrorism measures and intelligence-sharing are vital for preemptive action against transnational threats.
In conclusion, a holistic approach combining robust border security, intelligence coordination, socio-economic development, law enforcement modernization, and international cooperation is essential to safeguard India’s internal security against diverse external threats.
See less