Home/constitution/Page 2
- Recent Questions
- Most Answered
- Answers
- No Answers
- Most Visited
- Most Voted
- Random
- Bump Question
- New Questions
- Sticky Questions
- Polls
- Followed Questions
- Favorite Questions
- Recent Questions With Time
- Most Answered With Time
- Answers With Time
- No Answers With Time
- Most Visited With Time
- Most Voted With Time
- Random With Time
- Bump Question With Time
- New Questions With Time
- Sticky Questions With Time
- Polls With Time
- Followed Questions With Time
- Favorite Questions With Time
Most controversial amendment
One of the most controversial amendments to the Indian Constitution was the 42nd Amendment Act of 1976.The 42nd Amendment Act was contentious for its perceived erosion of democratic principles and fundamental rights, sparking widespread debate and criticism. Subsequent amendments and judicial interpRead more
One of the most controversial amendments to the Indian Constitution was the 42nd Amendment Act of 1976.The 42nd Amendment Act was contentious for its perceived erosion of democratic principles and fundamental rights, sparking widespread debate and criticism. Subsequent amendments and judicial interpretations have sought to restore the original balance of powers and uphold the core values of the Indian Constitution. This amendment was passed during the period of Emergency declared in 1975-1977 and introduced several significant changes:
1. **Fundamental Rights**: It altered the balance between fundamental rights and directive principles, asserting that the directive principles could override fundamental rights, which led to concerns about potential erosion of civil liberties.
2. **Constitutional Amendments**: The amendment restricted the Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution by requiring amendments related to the basic structure of the Constitution to be approved by a two-thirds majority and ratified by half of the state legislatures.
3. **Emergency Provisions**: It extended the duration of the emergency provisions and empowered the government to suspend fundamental rights during emergencies, which raised concerns about authoritarianism and abuse of power.
4. **Judicial Review**: The amendment curtailed the scope of judicial review, limiting the Supreme Court’s ability to review constitutional amendments, which was seen as undermining the independence of the judiciary.
5. **State Governments**: It increased the power of the central government over state governments, leading to fears of centralization and weakening of federalism.
One of the most controversial amendments to the Indian Constitution was the **42nd Amendment Act of 1976**. This amendment was passed during the period of Emergency declared in 1975-1977 and introduced several significant changes:
1. **Fundamental Rights**: It altered the balance between fundamental rights and directive principles, asserting that the directive principles could override fundamental rights, which led to concerns about potential erosion of civil liberties.
2. **Constitutional Amendments**: The amendment restricted the Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution by requiring amendments related to the basic structure of the Constitution to be approved by a two-thirds majority and ratified by half of the state legislatures.
3. **Emergency Provisions**: It extended the duration of the emergency provisions and empowered the government to suspend fundamental rights during emergencies, which raised concerns about authoritarianism and abuse of power.
4. **Judicial Review**: The amendment curtailed the scope of judicial review, limiting the Supreme Court’s ability to review constitutional amendments, which was seen as undermining the independence of the judiciary.
5. **State Governments**: It increased the power of the central government over state governments, leading to fears of centralization and weakening of federalism.
See lessIndian constitution
The Indian Constitution is widely regarded as a successful framework for governing the world's largest democracy. Enacted on January 26, 1950, it has provided a robust foundation for a diverse and pluralistic society. The Constitution's success can be attributed to several key factors. Firstly, it eRead more
The Indian Constitution is widely regarded as a successful framework for governing the world’s largest democracy. Enacted on January 26, 1950, it has provided a robust foundation for a diverse and pluralistic society. The Constitution’s success can be attributed to several key factors.
Firstly, it enshrines democratic principles, ensuring that power is derived from the people through regular, free, and fair elections. This has facilitated peaceful transitions of power and maintained political stability over the decades. Secondly, the Constitution guarantees fundamental rights, including equality, freedom of speech, and religious freedom, which protect citizens’ liberties and promote social justice.
The Constitution’s adaptability has been another cornerstone of its success. With over a hundred amendments, it has evolved to meet changing needs and challenges, demonstrating flexibility without compromising core values. Landmark amendments, such as the 73rd and 74th, have empowered local governance, enhancing grassroots democracy.
Judicial review, vested in an independent judiciary, ensures that the Constitution remains the supreme law of the land, safeguarding against unconstitutional actions by the state. The judiciary’s role in upholding constitutional values has been pivotal in maintaining the rule of law.
Furthermore, the Constitution’s federal structure balances power between the central and state governments, accommodating India’s vast diversity. This has been crucial in managing regional aspirations and maintaining national unity.
In essence, the Indian Constitution’s success lies in its ability to uphold democratic values, protect individual rights, adapt to change, and manage diversity, making it a living document that continues to guide and strengthen the nation.
See lessIn democracy the voice of the opposition should be amplified, not the noise. Discuss how this nature had effected the session in past decade. Also suggest measures to improve the efficiency and efficacy of the parliament.
In a democracy, the voice of the opposition should be amplified, not the noise. Over the past decade, Indian parliamentary sessions have often been disrupted by confrontations, reducing legislative productivity and diminishing public trust. For example, the 15th Lok Sabha lost over 40% of its scheduRead more
In a democracy, the voice of the opposition should be amplified, not the noise. Over the past decade, Indian parliamentary sessions have often been disrupted by confrontations, reducing legislative productivity and diminishing public trust. For example, the 15th Lok Sabha lost over 40% of its scheduled time due to such disruptions.
Enhancing Parliamentary Efficiency and Efficacy
Innovative Reforms:
By adopting these innovative measures, the Indian Parliament can transform into a dynamic forum for meaningful debate and decision-making, reflecting the true spirit of democracy and ensuring efficient governance.
See lessHow does Administrative laws differ from Constitutional laws? Substantiate your answer with a case study.
Administrative law and constitutional law are two distinct areas of law that serve different purposes. Administrative law focuses on the rules and regulations that govern the daily work of government agencies and public officials. It ensures that they act fairly, follow procedures, and don't abuse tRead more
Administrative law and constitutional law are two distinct areas of law that serve different purposes.
Administrative law focuses on the rules and regulations that govern the daily work of government agencies and public officials. It ensures that they act fairly, follow procedures, and don’t abuse their power.
Constitutional law, on the other hand, deals with the fundamental rights and freedoms of citizens, as enshrined in the Constitution. It sets limits on government power and protects individual liberties.
Let’s consider a case study:
In the landmark case of “Marbury v. Madison” (1803), the US Supreme Court established the principle of judicial review, which allows courts to strike down government actions that violate the Constitution. This case demonstrated the difference between administrative law and constitutional law. The Court was not reviewing an administrative decision, but rather ensuring that the government’s action aligned with the Constitution.
In simple terms, administrative law is like a “rule book” for government officials, while constitutional law is like a “bill of rights” that protects citizens from government overreach.
See lesswhat are the essential elements present in constitution for right to life?
In the Indian Constitution, the right to life is enshrined as a fundamental right under Article 21. Here are some essential elements present in the Indian Constitution with regards to the right to life: 1. Article 21: Article 21 of the Indian Constitution states that "No person shall be deprived ofRead more
In the Indian Constitution, the right to life is enshrined as a fundamental right under Article 21. Here are some essential elements present in the Indian Constitution with regards to the right to life:
1. Article 21: Article 21 of the Indian Constitution states that “No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law.” This provision ensures that every individual has the right to life and personal liberty, which cannot be taken away arbitrarily.
2. Right to Dignity: The Supreme Court of India has interpreted the right to life under Article 21 to include the right to live with dignity. This has expanded the scope of the right to life to encompass basic necessities for a dignified life.
3. Right to Privacy: The right to privacy has been recognized as a part of the right to life under Article 21. In landmark judgments such as Puttaswamy v. Union of India, the Supreme Court affirmed that privacy is an integral part of personal liberty and the right to life.
4. Right to Health: The right to health is considered an essential component of the right to life under Article 21. The Indian government is obligated to take measures to ensure access to healthcare services and promote public health to protect individuals’ lives.
5. Right to Clean Environment: The Supreme Court has held that the right to life under Article 21 includes the right to a clean and healthy environment. This recognition emphasizes the importance of environmental protection for safeguarding human life.
6. Right against Custodial Violence: The right to life under Article 21 includes the right to be free from custodial violence and torture. The Supreme Court has emphasized the importance of protecting individuals’ physical and mental integrity while in custody.
7. Right to Legal Aid: The right to legal aid is considered a part of the right to life under Article 21, ensuring that individuals have access to legal assistance to defend their rights and liberties.
These elements underscore the comprehensive nature of the right to life in the Indian Constitution, encompassing not only the protection of physical life but also factors that contribute to a meaningful and dignified existence. The interpretation and application of these elements have been shaped through various judicial pronouncements that have expanded the scope of the right to life in India.
See lessTransparency in Government
There are several measures that can be implemented to enhance transparency and accountability in government decision-making processes: Open Government Data: Governments should proactively publish comprehensive, machine-readable data on their activities, budgets, and decision-making processes. This oRead more
There are several measures that can be implemented to enhance transparency and accountability in government decision-making processes:
At the local level, citizens can effectively participate in promoting ethical governance through the following measures:
See lessCase Studies
The 42nd Amendment to the Indian Constitution, enacted in 1976, had significant implications on the balance of power between the central and state governments. Often referred to as a "mini-Constitution," it made extensive changes that strengthened the central government at the expense of state autonRead more
The 42nd Amendment to the Indian Constitution, enacted in 1976, had significant implications on the balance of power between the central and state governments. Often referred to as a “mini-Constitution,” it made extensive changes that strengthened the central government at the expense of state autonomy.
One of the major changes was the addition of the words “Socialist” and “Secular” to the Preamble, reinforcing the central government’s ideological direction. The amendment also curtailed the power of the judiciary, making it more difficult to challenge central laws and diminishing the states’ ability to contest central overreach.
Furthermore, the amendment transferred several subjects from the State List to the Concurrent List, allowing the central government greater legislative control over areas traditionally managed by states. This shift in legislative power further centralized authority, reducing the autonomy of state governments.
In essence, the 42nd Amendment significantly tilted the balance of power towards the center, weakening the federal structure of India. It created a more centralized form of governance, which has had lasting effects on the relationship between the central and state governments.
See lessCitizen Participation and Awareness
Enhancing public participation in the process of amending the Indian Constitution can have both potential benefits and challenges: Potential Benefits: Democratic Legitimacy: Increased citizen involvement can enhance the democratic legitimacy of constitutional amendments, as the people's voice is morRead more
Enhancing public participation in the process of amending the Indian Constitution can have both potential benefits and challenges:
Potential Benefits:
Potential Challenges:
- Logistical Complexity: Facilitating meaningful public participation in a country as large and diverse as India can pose significant logistical and organizational challenges.
- Balancing Interests: Reconciling the diverse and potentially conflicting interests of various stakeholders can be a complex and time-consuming process.
- Risk of Misinformation: In the absence of appropriate safeguards, increased public involvement can also lead to the spread of misinformation and manipulation of public opinion.
- Potential Gridlock: A highly participatory amendment process may also increase the risk of political gridlock, making it more difficult to achieve the necessary consensus for constitutional changes.
- Capacity Constraints: Many citizens may lack the necessary knowledge, resources, or capacity to engage effectively in the technical and legal aspects of constitutional amendments.
See lessWhat is the 52nd Amendment of the Indian Constitution and why was it introduced?
The Anti-Defection Law is another name for the 52nd Amendment to the Indian Constitution, which was passed in 1985. It amended the Constitution by adding the Tenth Schedule, which describes the procedure for removing lawmakers for defection. The purpose of this law was to prevent political defectionRead more
The Anti-Defection Law is another name for the 52nd Amendment to the Indian Constitution, which was passed in 1985. It amended the Constitution by adding the Tenth Schedule, which describes the procedure for removing lawmakers for defection. The purpose of this law was to prevent political defections brought about by the promise of financial benefits or position.
Benefits:
Cons:
In general, the 52nd Amendment presents issues with individual freedom and the consolidation of power, even as it seeks to reinforce the political system.
See less