The rights of persons with disabilities act, 2016 remains only a legal document without intense sensitization of government functionaries and citizens regarding disability. Comment.
Introduction Article 356, or "President's Rule," of the Indian Constitution enables the President to assume the administration of a state if the government is not functioning. This is a controversial rule that the central government can misuse. Since mid-1990s, the imposition of Article 356 has seenRead more
Introduction
Article 356, or “President’s Rule,” of the Indian Constitution enables the President to assume the administration of a state if the government is not functioning. This is a controversial rule that the central government can misuse. Since mid-1990s, the imposition of Article 356 has seen a decline. This discussion examines the legal and political factors that have led to this decline.
Legal Factors
SW2023-A9 | Supreme Court Ruling (S. R. Bommai v. Union of India, 1994)
One of the major legal developments that had put a cap on the abuse of Article 356 is the Supreme Court’s 1994 judgement in S. R. Bommai v. Union of India. The court ruled that the invocation of President’s Rule necessitates the establishment of the failure of the government of a state. It also established judicial review, allowing the Supreme Court to judge the legality of such decisions. The ruling had made it difficult for the central government to use of Article 356 without strong justification.
Judicial Scrutiny and Later Cases
In the aftermath of the Bommai ruling, courts have adopted a more alert and vigorous stance towards the validity of grounds on which President’s Rule should be invoked. Many subsequent cases have only strengthened the principles established in Bommai, leading to a more cautious application of Article 356. The risk that any ruling could be overturned, and a new judicial intervention, has deterred the central government.
Legal Reforms and Guidelines
The central government was forced to issue clarification on the procedure for invoking Article 356 in the wake of the Bommai verdict. Under the new guidelines, the Governor must now report to the President in detail the situation and provide evidence of government failure. These processes have improved transparency and enhanced the legal structure applied to the action of Article 356.
Political Factors
Multi-Party Coalition Governments
Since the mid-1990s, the bjp only controls a portion of the government, the rest under the control of a coalition of other parties. These coalitions are more heterogeneous and less centralized than single-party governments. Since they need the support of regional parties, they do use Article 356 (clamp down on states) with caution. Antagonising coalition partners makes trouble and so the centre is loath to impose President’s Rule.
The Politics of State autonomy and Regional Hegemony
I have access to data until October 2023. States can be more proactive in asserting their rights under the Constitution, very often galvanizing public and political support against the imposition of President’s Rule. This assertiveness makes it political risky for the central government to use Article 356 without strong justification.
Public and Media Watchfulness
A key function of the media is to hold the central government accountable. The media has audited the implementation of individuals leaving the measures under Article 356. Negative media coverage and public outpouring has given the central government reason to hesitate to invoke President’s Rule.
Consequences And Effects Of Political Actors
Because implementing President’s Rule could make political fallout – e.g., a loss of voter trust, and credibility. In a democracy, such actions could hurt the central government in the elections. Moreover, political parties are cognizant of these adverse impacts and thus, frequently pursue alternative approaches to remedy governance challenges.
Shifts in the Political Scene
India’s political landscape has been transformed since the mid-1990s. The decline of single-party dominance and the rise of regional and caste-based politics have made it far harder for the central government to justify recourse to President’s Rule. The Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha comprise of diverse political interests who would not let the central government take such an action easily.
Conclusion
There have been both legal and political reasons, which has led to a decline in the application of Article 356 since the mid-1990s. Separated by law, S. R. Bommai v. Union of India and closer court scrutiny have made the central government more accountable, and the process more transparent. On the political front, the emergence of coalition governments and increasing state autonomy have made the application of President’s Rule more cautious. Public and media scrutiny also forces the government to proceed carefully. These developments have made for a more robust democracy with a better balance of power between the central government and the states.
See less
The RPwD Act or the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, is an important law of India aimed at the safety, rights and dignity of persons with disabilities. It superseded the 1995 legislation, marking a significant step forward in legal advocacy for disability rights. While the act detailsRead more
The RPwD Act or the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, is an important law of India aimed at the safety, rights and dignity of persons with disabilities. It superseded the 1995 legislation, marking a significant step forward in legal advocacy for disability rights. While the act details the provisions the government should include in its planning, it remains a largely legal document that few outside the government are aware of.
Goals of the RPwD Act, 2016
The Act was enacted to comply with India’s obligations to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD). It is about being treated with dignity, equality and inclusion for people with disabilities. Key aspects of the act are:
Expanded Definition of Disability: The act broadens the definition of what constitutes a disability, covering more types of conditions, including certain learning disabilities, mental illnesses and chronic neurological disorders.
Prohibition against Discriminatory Practices: They cannot discriminate against people with disabilities in education, employment, and access to public services.
Equal Opportunities in All Aspects: The law obliges instituting job quotas in the public sector with special measures for education and training.
Strengthening Accessibility: It mandates both government and private organizations to provide accessible infrastructure, transportation, and communication.
Setting up monitoring and remedy frameworks: The act provides for the appointment of Central Disability Commissioner and State Disability Commissioners, creates mechanisms to redress complaints and punishes infractions.
The Importance of Awareness
A well-intentioned piece of legislation like the RPwD Act, 2016 is grounded in giving people with disabilities the chance to lead their life with dignity, but how far that has been translated depends on different stakeholders who are intrinsically connected to it. This is why awareness is so important:
Understanding the Law: Government workers, educators, employers and citizens must fully understand the law. They must understand the rights of people with disabilities, which parties owe them obligations and how the law is enforced and problems addressed.
Changing Perspectives: Perspective change in how we perception towards disability is a slow process. Raising awareness about both neurodiversity and accepted the nature of differences promotes the collapse of stereotypes, diminishes stigma, and create acceptance.
Training Staff Government employees need to be trained how to apply the law consistently. They must understand the needs of different disabilities, and create policies and programs that are inclusive.
Community Knowledge: People — particularly in areas with more disabilities — need to know their rights and where to get help. This knowledge enables them to self-advocate and seek help.
Collaborating: Awareness helps government, NGOs, and businesses to cooperate to support people with disabilities, exchanging best practices, resources, and skills.
Current Challenges
There are, however, several challenges to implementing the RPwD Act, 2016:
Awareness Deficiency: The act and its provisions are unknown to many of the government officials, educators, and employers leading to frequent violations and poor implementation of the act.
Lack of Training: Training for all government workers is short. Officials also may not know how to implement the act properly or know how to best support individuals with disabilities without proper training.
Stigma and Discrimination: Societal attitudes toward disability are major barriers. Despite legal protections, direct or indirect discrimination and stigma can underwrite barriers to the enjoyment of rights for persons with disabilities.
Shortage of Resources: There is a lack of financial and human resources available for implementation of the act Most organizations lack the resources or staff to develop inclusive infrastructure or provide specialized training.
Fragile Monitoring and Enforcement: There is no strong oversight机制。 Nothing guarantees that the act’s provisions will be enforced uniformly in different regions and in different industries, without robust supervision.
Methods to Enhance Awareness
With this in mind, the following strategies can help educate government employees and members of the public to address these issues:
Also Read: Integrated Training Sessions: Initiate in-depth training of government officials, teachers, employers and healthcare providers regularly. Such programs should also clarify legal requirements, disseminate best practices, and underscore the importance of being inclusive.
Public Awareness Campaigns: Implement mass media, community outreach, and educational initiatives to raise awareness of the rights of people with disabilities. Develop these campaigns for target audiences and highlight best practices and success stories.
School Curriculums: Include disability in school curriculums for education and inclusion at a young age This includes education about diverse disabilities, the rights of people with disabilities, and a need for accessibility.
Collaboration with Civil Society: Recognizing that the immediate stakeholders of the SDGs are NGOs, disability rights groups and advocacy organizations, and work with them to create awareness. They need their insights and first-hand experience to develop more effective policies and programs.
Strengthening legal and administrative structures: Better empower the Central and State Disability Commissioners and other legal institutions so that every law enacted has force and that grievances can be resolved expeditiously.
Policy: Institute omnibus public policy targeting inclusion of disability rights in all government programs. Make infrastructure projects, healthcare services, and social programs available to all.
Final Thoughts
The enactment of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 is a milestone within the records of incapacity rights within the Indian subcontinent. But working together is key to making an impact. Education and training on disability rights for people within government as well as members of the public. Implementing awareness programs and integrating these rights into every social fabric are crucial. Not just a law that looks good on paper, but moves on to change the lives of all those with disabilities.
See less