What were the ideologies of the opposing sides? Why did the United States show such a strong opposition towards communism?
The chance of World War III is not very high, but it's hard to say for sure. Several things help prevent a big global war: **Diplomacy**: Countries work through international organizations like the UN to solve problems peacefully. **Economic Ties**: Many countries depend on each other economically,Read more
The chance of World War III is not very high, but it’s hard to say for sure. Several things help prevent a big global war:
**Diplomacy**: Countries work through international organizations like the UN to solve problems peacefully.
**Economic Ties**: Many countries depend on each other economically, so war would harm everyone involved.
**Nuclear Weapons**: The threat of nuclear destruction makes countries think twice before starting a major conflict.
**Regional Conflicts**: Instead of a world war, we often see smaller conflicts in specific regions, which are usually managed by international efforts.
**Technology**: Modern technology helps detect and prevent large-scale wars before they start.
**Public Opinion**: People around the world generally want peace, which pressures governments to avoid war.
Overall, while tensions exist, the combination of diplomacy, economic connections, and nuclear deterrence makes a world war less likely.
See less
An assembly to NATO or SEATO and the Third World membership appears an irony given that the Non-Aligned Movement might have been seeking to be independent from the domination of Cold War superpowers’ alliances. Nevertheless, the following factors account for the alignments without compromising the tRead more
An assembly to NATO or SEATO and the Third World membership appears an irony given that the Non-Aligned Movement might have been seeking to be independent from the domination of Cold War superpowers’ alliances. Nevertheless, the following factors account for the alignments without compromising the third world order.
1. Strategic Survival: Some of these emerging nations had domestic problems, some had border issues or even had to confront neighboring nations. Becoming a member of SEATO or CENTO ensured military security as well as defense, which was the basic need in that era.
2. Economic Incentives: Aid was provided accordingly to the beautiful envelopes of the alliances of the superpowers. Poorest of the countries got involved in either of the two camps for money, developing infrastructures or military backup.
3. Pragmatic Non-Alignment: Therefore some of the Third World countries did not fully adhere to the principles of NAM. Most followed a policy of ‘operative non-alignment,’ regularly participating in the affairs of super(power) blocs but at the same time insisting on an independent policy in other respects.
4. Internal Political Pressures: In the domestic political arrangements, leaderships would tend to group based on their ideological valuess or in order to wield power within the home country to the detriment of the principles of NAM.
5. Limited Global Influence: The Third World order did not accumulate enough coherent institutional support. Thus, the decision to join treatises was not altering, at the individual country level, with the spirit of non-alignment, which provided the common framework.
These treaties were a result of a cold war diplomacy and the catch 22 situation that the Third World nations had to contend with, between the withering away of imperialism and the need for vote banks amidst crushing economic realities. Though affiliation to such alliances raised eyebrows, it did not practically undo the general agenda of the NAM.
See less