Discuss the merits and demerits of caste-based surveys based on enumeration exercises in Bihar and Andhra Pradesh.
Role of Interstate Council in Dispute Resolution The Interstate Council plays a crucial role in fostering cooperative federalism by facilitating the resolution of disputes between states. It serves as a platform for dialogue and collaboration, allowing states to discuss and negotiate their differencRead more
Role of Interstate Council in Dispute Resolution
The Interstate Council plays a crucial role in fostering cooperative federalism by facilitating the resolution of disputes between states. It serves as a platform for dialogue and collaboration, allowing states to discuss and negotiate their differences amicably. The ISC conducts meetings where representatives from various states come together to address common concerns and conflicts. By providing a structured forum, the ISC encourages states to seek mutual agreements and solutions, reducing the need for prolonged legal battles. The ISC also assists in harmonizing policies across states, promoting uniformity and cooperation.
Challenges in Dispute Resolution
Despite its pivotal role, the ISC faces several challenges in effectively resolving state-related disputes. One challenge is the lack of mandatory enforcement power; the ISC can only recommend solutions, which states may choose to ignore. Political differences and regional interests hinder consensus-building, making it difficult to achieve lasting resolutions. The ISC’s infrequent meetings and limited resources impedes its ability to address disputes promptly and comprehensively. Ensuring equal representation and addressing power imbalances between states further complicates the ISC’s efforts to mediate conflicts effectively. Strengthening the ISC’s authority and enhancing its operational capabilities are essential to overcoming these challenges.
See less
Different political systems greatly impact governance effectiveness and civil liberties protection. Democracies, with free elections and accountability, usually ensure transparent, efficient governance and robust civil liberties like freedom of speech and assembly. Authoritarian regimes, with powerRead more
Different political systems greatly impact governance effectiveness and civil liberties protection. Democracies, with free elections and accountability, usually ensure transparent, efficient governance and robust civil liberties like freedom of speech and assembly. Authoritarian regimes, with power centralized in a single ruler or group, can make swift decisions but often lack transparency and accountability, leading to inefficiency and corruption, while restricting civil liberties to maintain control. Hybrid regimes, mixing democratic and authoritarian elements, offer inconsistent governance and uneven civil liberties protection. Monarchies vary: absolute ones centralize power and limit freedoms, while constitutional monarchies align with democratic principles, ensuring better governance and civil liberties. Communist states, despite theoretically being people-governed, often concentrate power in one party, resulting in efficient but unaccountable governance and restricted civil liberties. Federal systems, dividing power between national and regional governments, balance effective local governance with strong civil liberties protection, while unitary systems, with centralized power, may enforce uniform policies quickly but sometimes overlook local needs and reduce accountability, with civil liberties protection dependent on the central government’s nature. Overall, democracies tend to excel in both governance and civil liberties, whereas authoritarian and hybrid systems often fall short in these areas.
See less