Where would India currently stand in terms of economic development if Britishers rule would have not existed?
Colonial rule in India was very bad for the traditional economy. It hurt artisans and craftsmen, brought in new landlords who made farming hard, and made agriculture poor.
Colonial rule in India was very bad for the traditional economy. It hurt artisans and craftsmen, brought in new landlords who made farming hard, and made agriculture poor.
See less
Assessing where India would stand economically without British rule involves speculation, but several points can be considered based on historical context and economic theories: Pre-Colonial Economy: Before British rule, India had a robust economy with thriving agriculture, crafts, and trade. It wasRead more
Assessing where India would stand economically without British rule involves speculation, but several points can be considered based on historical context and economic theories:
While it’s challenging to determine the exact standing, it’s plausible that India could have been an economically advanced nation with substantial industrial and technological development, leveraging its rich resources and cultural heritage.
See less