Role of External State & Non-state Actors

Role of External State and Non-State Actors in the Proliferation of Small Arms and Light Weapons in India and Its Impact on Internal Security

Introduction

The proliferation of small arms and light weapons (SALW) in India, influenced by external state and non-state actors, has significant implications for internal security. This proliferation affects various aspects of domestic stability, including criminal activities, insurgencies, and communal violence. This assessment explores the role of these actors in the proliferation of SALW and examines its impact on India’s internal security environment.

1. Role of External State Actors

a. State-Sponsored Support for Insurgencies

Pakistan and Insurgent Groups: Pakistan has been involved in providing arms and logistical support to insurgent groups operating in India’s border regions, particularly in Jammu and Kashmir. Groups like Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) and Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) have received arms from across the border, which have been used in numerous attacks, including the Pulwama attack of 2019. The availability of these weapons has exacerbated the insurgency and posed a direct threat to internal security.
China and the North-East: There have been allegations that China has provided indirect support to insurgent groups in India’s North-East, such as the National Socialist Council of Nagaland (NSCN) and the United Liberation Front of Asom (ULFA). These groups have reportedly received weapons and ammunition through clandestine channels, impacting the stability of the region.
b. Diplomatic and Covert Operations

International Arms Trade: The international arms trade, often facilitated by state actors, contributes to the proliferation of small arms. Countries with lax export controls can become sources of illicit arms smuggling into India. For example, weapons diverted from South-East Asia and Eastern Europe have been found in the hands of insurgent groups and criminal networks within India.
2. Role of Non-State Actors

a. Criminal Syndicates and Smuggling Networks

Arms Smuggling: Non-state actors such as criminal syndicates play a significant role in the proliferation of SALW through illegal smuggling operations. The India-Bangladesh border and the India-Myanmar border are known smuggling routes for arms. Recent investigations have revealed that these smuggling networks supply weapons to various criminal and insurgent groups within India.
Illicit Trade and Distribution: Organized crime groups, including gangs involved in drug trafficking, also deal in small arms. The Kuki-Chin drug trade in Manipur, for instance, involves not only drug trafficking but also the illegal arms trade, which supports insurgent activities and local criminal networks.
b. Extremist and Terrorist Organizations

ISIS and Domestic Threats: While ISIS has not been directly involved in small arms proliferation in India, its ideology has influenced domestic extremist groups that have sought to acquire and use SALW. For example, radicalized individuals and small local cells influenced by ISIS may engage in illicit arms trading to support their activities.
Local Insurgent Groups: Groups like the Maoist Naxalites use small arms in their insurgency against the state. These weapons often originate from illegal sources and contribute to violent incidents and attacks on security forces.
3. Impact on Internal Security

a. Increased Violence and Crime

Criminal Activities: The proliferation of SALW has led to an increase in violent crime, including armed robbery and gang violence. Cities like Delhi and Mumbai have witnessed a rise in crimes involving small arms, impacting public safety and security.
Insurgency and Terrorism: The availability of SALW has intensified insurgent activities and terrorist attacks. The Guwahati bombings and various attacks by Naxalite groups highlight how access to arms fuels ongoing violence and instability in conflict-prone areas.
b. Challenges to Law Enforcement and Security Forces

Operational Difficulties: Security forces face challenges in countering well-armed insurgent and criminal groups. The Chhattisgarh Naxal attack in 2021, where heavily armed Naxalites ambushed a security convoy, underscores the difficulties faced by law enforcement in dealing with groups equipped with advanced weaponry.
Increased Casualties: The use of small arms in conflicts leads to higher casualties among both security personnel and civilians. The Naxalite-Maoist insurgency has resulted in significant losses for security forces due to the widespread availability of arms.
4. Measures to Address the Issue

a. Strengthening Border Security

Enhanced Surveillance and Patrols: Improving border security measures to detect and prevent illegal arms smuggling is crucial. The use of technology such as drones and sensors can help monitor and control smuggling routes.
International Cooperation: Collaborating with neighboring countries and international organizations to address arms trafficking can enhance border security efforts. For example, India’s engagement with Bangladesh and Myanmar to combat cross-border smuggling has been a step towards mitigating this issue.
b. Legal and Regulatory Measures

Stringent Arms Control Laws: Enforcing stricter arms control laws and regulations can help curb the proliferation of SALW. The Arms Act, 1959 and its amendments need to be effectively implemented and updated to address new challenges.
Monitoring and Enforcement: Strengthening enforcement agencies and increasing penalties for illegal arms possession and trafficking can deter criminal activities. The National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) and Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) play key roles in monitoring and investigating arms-related crimes.
c. Community and Civil Society Engagement

Awareness Programs: Educating communities about the dangers of small arms proliferation and involving civil society in arms control efforts can help reduce local support for illicit arms trade. Community policing initiatives and awareness campaigns can build trust and cooperation between law enforcement and local populations.
Rehabilitation and Disarmament: Implementing disarmament and rehabilitation programs for former insurgents and criminals can help reduce the number of weapons in circulation. Programs like the Surrender and Rehabilitation Policy in Jammu and Kashmir aim to encourage insurgents to give up arms and reintegrate into society.
Conclusion

The proliferation of small arms and light weapons in India, influenced by both external state and non-state actors, poses significant challenges to internal security. Addressing this issue requires a comprehensive approach, including strengthening border security, enforcing stringent legal measures, enhancing community engagement, and fostering international cooperation. By implementing these measures, India can mitigate the impact of SALW proliferation and enhance its internal security environment.

Influence of External State and Non-State Actors in Insurgencies and Separatist Movements in India’s Border Regions

Introduction

India’s border regions have been significant flashpoints for insurgencies and separatist movements, often influenced by external state and non-state actors. These influences complicate the resolution of conflicts and the maintenance of internal security. This analysis examines the impact of such actors on insurgencies and separatist movements and explores the challenges in addressing these threats, with recent examples providing context.

1. Influence of External State Actors

a. State Support for Insurgencies

Pakistan and Kashmir Insurgency: Pakistan has been a prominent external state actor supporting insurgent groups in Jammu and Kashmir. Groups like Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) and Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) have received support from Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI). The Pulwama attack of February 2019, which resulted in the deaths of 40 CRPF personnel, was carried out by a JeM operative, highlighting the ongoing external influence.
China and North-Eastern Insurgencies: China has been alleged to provide indirect support to insurgent groups in India’s Northeast, particularly in Arunachal Pradesh and Nagaland. Some reports suggest that China has offered refuge to leaders of insurgent groups such as the National Socialist Council of Nagaland (NSCN), although direct evidence of such support remains limited.
b. Diplomatic and Political Support

Internationalization of Regional Conflicts: Countries like Pakistan have attempted to internationalize the Kashmir issue by bringing it up in international forums such as the United Nations. This international support can embolden separatist groups and internationalize the conflict, complicating diplomatic and security efforts.
2. Influence of Non-State Actors

a. Terrorist and Insurgent Groups

Recruitment and Radicalization: Non-state actors like ISIS have made efforts to recruit and radicalize individuals in India’s border regions. The group’s propaganda has targeted vulnerable youth in Jammu and Kashmir, contributing to radicalization and insurgency.
Local Insurgent Groups: Regional insurgent groups such as the United Liberation Front of Assam (ULFA) and the Bodo insurgents in Assam, as well as the Maoist Naxalites, often receive logistical and financial support from diaspora communities and international sympathizers, impacting local security dynamics.
b. Cross-Border Smuggling and Arms Trafficking

Arms Smuggling Networks: Non-state actors involved in arms trafficking often support insurgent groups by smuggling weapons and ammunition. For instance, arms smuggling through the porous India-Bangladesh border has facilitated the activities of insurgent groups in India’s Northeast.
Drug Trade: The illicit drug trade, often linked to organized crime syndicates and insurgent groups, destabilizes border regions and provides funding for insurgent activities. The Kuki-Chin drug trade in Manipur is an example where drug money has supported insurgent activities.
3. Challenges in Addressing These Threats

a. Geopolitical Complexities

Diplomatic Strains: Engaging with neighboring countries like Pakistan and China on issues related to insurgencies is complicated by geopolitical tensions. Diplomatic efforts to address external support for insurgent groups are often hindered by broader political and strategic conflicts.
Cross-Border Operations: Conducting cross-border operations to address insurgent threats is fraught with diplomatic and logistical challenges. For example, surgical strikes like the one in September 2016 targeting terrorist camps in Pakistan-administered Kashmir were controversial and raised diplomatic issues.
b. Local Dynamics and Radicalization

Socio-Economic Factors: Socio-economic factors, including poverty, unemployment, and lack of development, contribute to the radicalization and recruitment of individuals into insurgent groups. Addressing these root causes is essential but challenging due to the complexity of local dynamics.
Community Relations: Insurgent groups often exploit local grievances and community divisions to gain support. This complicates efforts to win hearts and minds and to build effective counter-insurgency strategies.
c. Intelligence and Security Challenges

Intelligence Gaps: Accurate and timely intelligence is crucial for countering insurgent activities. However, intelligence gaps and difficulties in gathering actionable information in remote and challenging border regions can hinder security operations.
Coordination Issues: Effective counter-insurgency requires coordination between various security agencies and state governments. Fragmented efforts and lack of inter-agency cooperation can reduce the effectiveness of counter-insurgency operations.
d. Legal and Human Rights Concerns

Balancing Security and Rights: Ensuring security while respecting human rights is a delicate balance. Excessive use of force or human rights abuses by security forces can alienate local populations and exacerbate insurgent grievances.
Legal Framework: Implementing laws and policies to address insurgent activities while adhering to legal standards is challenging. For instance, the Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA) has faced criticism for its impact on civil liberties, complicating counter-insurgency efforts.
4. Recommended Measures

a. Enhanced Diplomacy and Regional Cooperation

Strengthening Diplomatic Channels: Engaging in robust diplomatic efforts to address the external support for insurgent groups and building regional cooperation are essential for managing cross-border security threats.
Bilateral Agreements: Negotiating bilateral agreements with neighboring countries to control arms smuggling and address insurgency-related issues can help mitigate external influences.
b. Addressing Root Causes

Development Initiatives: Implementing development programs to address socio-economic issues in conflict-prone regions can help reduce the appeal of insurgent groups. Initiatives like the Prime Minister’s Development Package (PMDP) for Jammu and Kashmir aim to improve infrastructure and economic opportunities.
Community Engagement: Engaging with local communities to address grievances and build trust can help counter radicalization and support efforts to combat insurgency.
c. Strengthening Security and Intelligence

Improving Intelligence Capabilities: Investing in advanced intelligence gathering and analysis can enhance the ability to track and disrupt insurgent activities.
Enhancing Coordination: Fostering better coordination between security agencies and state governments is crucial for effective counter-insurgency operations.
Conclusion

The influence of external state and non-state actors on insurgencies and separatist movements in India’s border regions presents significant challenges for internal security. Addressing these threats requires a multi-pronged approach, including diplomatic engagement, development initiatives, enhanced security measures, and community outreach. A comprehensive strategy that balances security needs with respect for human rights and addresses the underlying socio-economic factors will be key to mitigating the impact of these external and internal influences.