Sign Up

Have an account?

Sign In

Don't have account,

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.


Have an account?

Sorry, you do not have permission to ask a question, You must login to ask a question.

Need An Account,

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Search
Ask A Question

Statutory, regulatory & various quasi-judicial bodies

In addition to constitutional bodies, countries also establish various statutory, regulatory, and quasi-judicial bodies through legislation. These include administrative agencies, tribunals, commissions, and authorities that regulate specific sectors, industries, or societal functions. Examples are competition authorities, environmental protection agencies, and consumer dispute redressal forums.

These bodies have rule-making, adjudicatory, and enforcement powers to implement laws and policies in their respective domains.

Share
Followers
79 Answers
57 Questions
Home/Indian Polity/Statutory, regulatory & various quasi-judicial bodies/Page 3

Mains Answer Writing Latest Questions

Team
  • 0
TeamSupreme
Asked: August 21, 2024In:
  • 0

Roadmap for Answer Writing Introduction Definition of Quasi-Judicial Bodies: Introduce the concept of quasi-judicial bodies as administrative entities with the authority to adjudicate disputes and make decisions similar to courts. Importance: Explain their role in providing efficient and specialized dispute resolution mechanisms outside the traditional ...

upsc: statutory regulatory & various quasi-judicial bodies
  1. Team
    Best Answer
    Team Supreme

    Model Answer Introduction Quasi-judicial bodies are administrative entities that possess the authority to adjudicate disputes, make decisions, and impose penalties in specific areas. While they are not part of the traditional judicial system, they exercise powers similar to those of courts, offeringRead more

    Model Answer

    Introduction

    Quasi-judicial bodies are administrative entities that possess the authority to adjudicate disputes, make decisions, and impose penalties in specific areas. While they are not part of the traditional judicial system, they exercise powers similar to those of courts, offering a more efficient mechanism for dispute resolution. The establishment of such bodies is empowered by Articles 323A and 323B of the Indian Constitution.

    Body

    Constitutional Provisions

    1. Article 323A: This article allows for the creation of administrative tribunals to resolve disputes related to public services.
    2. Article 323B: This provision permits both Parliament and State Legislatures to establish tribunals for various issues, including taxation, land reforms, and industrial disputes.

    These provisions enable a specialized system that supplements the traditional judiciary, ensuring quicker resolutions in specific domains.

    Examples of Quasi-Judicial Bodies

    1. Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT):
      • Established under the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.
      • Adjudicates disputes concerning the recruitment and service conditions of public servants.
      • Aims to provide speedy redressal for grievances of government employees, thereby reducing the load on traditional courts.
    2. National Green Tribunal (NGT):
      • Founded under the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010.
      • Focuses on environmental disputes, enforcing legal rights related to the environment, pollution control, and conservation of natural resources.
      • Has the authority to hear civil cases involving substantial environmental questions and impose penalties on violators.
    3. Competition Commission of India (CCI):
      • Set up under the Competition Act, 2002.
      • Aims to prevent practices that adversely affect competition, protect consumer interests, and ensure market freedom.
      • Investigates anti-competitive practices, imposes penalties, and regulates market competition.
    4. Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT):
      • Established under the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) Act, 1997.
      • Adjudicates disputes and hears appeals related to the telecommunications sector.
      • Ensures effective dispute resolution in a rapidly evolving industry.

    Conclusion

    Quasi-judicial bodies play a crucial role in providing efficient, specialized dispute resolution mechanisms, complementing the traditional judicial system and addressing the complexities of modern governance.

    See less
Team
  • 0
TeamSupreme
Asked: August 21, 2024In:
  • 0

Roadmap for Answer Writing Introduction Briefly introduce the National Commission for Women (NCW), including its establishment year and primary objectives. State the importance of evaluating its effectiveness in addressing women’s issues in both public and private spheres. Strengths of the NCW Legal Awareness and Support: ...

upsc: statutory regulatory & various quasi-judicial bodies
  1. Team
    Best Answer
    Team Supreme

    Model Answer Introduction The National Commission for Women (NCW) is a statutory body in India, established in 1992, aimed at protecting and promoting women's interests. It plays a crucial role in strategizing and addressing the challenges women face in both public and private spheres. However, theRead more

    Model Answer

    Introduction

    The National Commission for Women (NCW) is a statutory body in India, established in 1992, aimed at protecting and promoting women’s interests. It plays a crucial role in strategizing and addressing the challenges women face in both public and private spheres. However, the effectiveness of the NCW in meeting these objectives can be debated.

    Strengths of the NCW

    1. Legal Awareness and Support: The NCW provides legal aid and guidance to women facing violence, harassment, or discrimination. It supports the implementation of laws like the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act and the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act, helping women understand their rights and seek justice (NCW, 2020).
    2. Policy Recommendations: The NCW has been instrumental in advocating for policy changes and legal amendments to tackle issues like dowry and domestic violence. Its recommendations for gender-sensitive policies across various sectors have influenced legislative changes (NCW Annual Report, 2021).
    3. Research and Advocacy: Through research and studies, the NCW gathers data on women’s issues, which it uses to advocate for policy changes and raise public awareness about gender equality (NCW, 2022).
    4. Capacity Building and Training: The NCW organizes workshops and training programs for stakeholders, including law enforcement and NGOs, to enhance their ability to address women’s issues effectively (NCW, 2021).

    Challenges Faced by the NCW

    1. Limited Powers: The NCW lacks enforcement authority and can only provide recommendations. This limitation can hinder its ability to ensure action is taken on reported cases (Sharma, 2021).
    2. Resource Constraints: Inadequate funding and staffing restrict the NCW’s capacity to tackle the myriad problems faced by women effectively (Economic and Political Weekly, 2022).
    3. Regional Disparities: The impact of the NCW varies across states due to differences in local governance and socio-cultural factors, leading to uneven progress (NCW, 2022).
    4. Inadequate Implementation: Societal attitudes and bureaucratic hurdles often impede the practical implementation of laws and policies, limiting their effectiveness on the ground (Choudhary, 2021).

    Conclusion

    While the NCW has made significant strides in advocating for women’s rights, its effectiveness is curtailed by limited powers, resource constraints, and implementation challenges. Enhancing its effectiveness requires greater political will, increased resources, and collaboration with state bodies and stakeholders.

    See less
Team
  • 0
TeamSupreme
Asked: August 20, 2024In:
  • 0

Roadmap for Answer Writing 1. Introduction Define tribunals and their purpose in the Indian legal system. Mention their constitutional basis under Articles 323A and 323B. 2. Extent to Which Tribunals Curtail the Jurisdiction of Ordinary Courts Specialized Jurisdiction: Explain how tribunals handle specific subject matters (e.g., ...

upsc: statutory regulatory & various quasi-judicial bodies
  1. Team
    Best Answer
    Team Supreme

    Model Answer Introduction Tribunals in India serve as specialized quasi-judicial bodies under Article 323A and Article 323B of the Constitution. They are designed to adjudicate disputes in specific areas, such as tax, environment, and labor. The primary aim of tribunals is to provide efficient, costRead more

    Model Answer

    Introduction

    Tribunals in India serve as specialized quasi-judicial bodies under Article 323A and Article 323B of the Constitution. They are designed to adjudicate disputes in specific areas, such as tax, environment, and labor. The primary aim of tribunals is to provide efficient, cost-effective, and expert resolutions to disputes, thereby alleviating the burden on ordinary courts.

    Do Tribunals Curtail the Jurisdiction of Ordinary Courts

    Extent of Curtailment

    1. Specialized Jurisdiction: Tribunals often handle specific subject matters, which allows them to address disputes that would typically fall under the purview of ordinary courts.
    2. Exclusive Jurisdiction: In certain cases, tribunals possess exclusive jurisdiction over particular disputes, effectively limiting the involvement of ordinary courts in those matters.
    3. Limited Appellate Jurisdiction: Appeals from tribunal decisions typically go to higher tribunals or High Courts, which further restricts the jurisdiction of ordinary courts.

    Retention of Ordinary Court Jurisdiction

    1. Constitutional Safeguard: The Indian Constitution guarantees the right to approach High Courts and the Supreme Court for enforcing fundamental rights, ensuring that ordinary courts maintain a vital role in the judicial system.
    2. Judicial Review: Tribunal decisions can be challenged in High Courts and the Supreme Court on grounds of constitutional violations or breaches of natural justice, preserving the supervisory authority of ordinary courts.

    Constitutional Validity and Competency of Tribunals

    1. Constitutional Provisions: The establishment of tribunals is sanctioned under Articles 323A and 323B, empowering Parliament and State Legislatures to create tribunals for specific purposes.
    2. Expertise: Tribunals are often staffed by professionals with specialized knowledge, which enhances their competency in resolving technical disputes.
    3. Speedy Justice: Tribunals typically follow less formal procedures and have fewer adjournments, leading to quicker dispute resolution compared to ordinary courts.
    4. Access to Justice: Tribunals are generally more accessible and affordable for litigants, particularly in cases involving specialized matters.

    Conclusion

    The constitutional validity of tribunals is firmly established under Articles 323A and 323B, while their competency is demonstrated through their expertise and efficiency. However, it is crucial to maintain a balance between tribunal jurisdiction and that of ordinary courts to protect litigants’ rights and ensure an effective, accessible judicial system.

    See less
Reena Bhatt
  • 0
Reena BhattBegginer
Asked: August 17, 2024In:
  • 0

Roadmap for Answer Writing 1. Introduction Definition of CAT: Introduce the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) and its establishment under the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985. Purpose: State its original purpose of redressing grievances and complaints related to central government employees. Thesis Statement: Mention the evolution ...

upsc: statutory regulatory & various quasi-judicial bodies
  1. Team
    Best Answer
    Team Supreme

    Model Answer Introduction The Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) was established under the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, to provide a specialized forum for addressing grievances and complaints involving central government employees. Over the years, CAT has evolved into an independent judiciRead more

    Model Answer

    Introduction

    The Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) was established under the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, to provide a specialized forum for addressing grievances and complaints involving central government employees. Over the years, CAT has evolved into an independent judicial authority that upholds the principles of natural justice.

    Evolution of CAT’s Independence

    The independence and impartiality of CAT have been strengthened through several key factors:

    1. Appointment and Tenure:
      • Members, including the Chairman and Vice-Chairman, are appointed by the President of India, which ensures a degree of independence from the executive branch. Their tenure is fixed, and they can only be removed for specific, justifiable reasons, allowing them security in decision-making (Source: Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985).
    2. Nature of Proceedings:
      • CAT conducts its proceedings with flexibility, adhering to the principles of natural justice. It is not bound by strict rules of evidence, which allows for a more fair and just approach to dispute resolution (Source: CAT Procedural Guidelines).
    3. Right to Appeal:
      • Decisions made by CAT can be appealed to High Courts and subsequently to the Supreme Court, establishing a system of checks and balances that reinforces the rule of law and the tribunal’s independence.

    Landmark Judgments

    Several landmark judgments illustrate CAT’s role as an independent judicial authority:

    • Ajit Singh Januja Case (1997):
      • CAT ruled in favor of employees denied promotions based on seniority rules, asserting its authority to scrutinize government decisions on service matters.
    • Mohan Kumar Singhania Case (1991):
      • The tribunal held that the compulsory retirement of a government employee without providing reasons was arbitrary and violated the principles of natural justice.

    Conclusion

    By exercising its powers transparently and impartially, CAT plays a critical role in safeguarding the rights of government employees. Its evolution into an independent judicial authority ensures adherence to natural justice in resolving service-related disputes, enhancing the integrity of the administrative framework in India.

    See less
Team
  • 0
TeamSupreme
Asked: August 17, 2024In:
  • 0

Describe the goals and makeup of “NITI Aayog.” What noteworthy accomplishments has it made? (200 Words) [UPPSC 2022]

uppsc: statutory regulatory & various quasi-judicial bodies
  1. Keshav Bajaj
    Keshav Bajaj Begginer

    NITI Aayog (National Institution for Transforming India) was established in January 2015, replacing the Planning Commission. It serves as the premier policy think tank of the Indian government, aimed at fostering cooperative federalism and driving sustainable economic development. Objectives: PolicyRead more

    NITI Aayog (National Institution for Transforming India) was established in January 2015, replacing the Planning Commission. It serves as the premier policy think tank of the Indian government, aimed at fostering cooperative federalism and driving sustainable economic development.

    Objectives:

    1. Policy Formulation: NITI Aayog supports the central and state governments in policy formulation and implementation strategies, focusing on holistic development.
    2. Strategic Planning: It emphasizes long-term strategic planning and addressing emerging challenges through research and analysis.
    3. Cooperative Federalism: It promotes collaboration between the central and state governments to achieve equitable and inclusive growth.
    4. Innovation and Reforms: It encourages innovation and reforms in various sectors, including health, education, and infrastructure.

    Composition: NITI Aayog comprises a Chairperson (Prime Minister of India), a Vice-Chairperson, and members including full-time and part-time members appointed by the central government. It also includes a CEO and a team of professionals.

    Significant Achievements:

    1. Transforming Schemes: Initiated reforms in several schemes like the Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana (PMJDY) and Swachh Bharat Mission.
    2. Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Played a pivotal role in integrating SDGs into national policies.
    3. State Collaboration: Enhanced cooperative federalism by working closely with states on various developmental programs.
    See less
Team
  • 0
TeamSupreme
Asked: August 16, 2024In:
  • 0

Roadmap for Answer Writing Introduction Define the concept of constitutionalization and its significance for a Commission. Briefly introduce the National Commission for Women (NCW) and the relevance of its constitutional status. Steps Required for Constitutionalization of a Commission Drafting a Proposal: Outline the necessity for constitutionalization, ...

upsc: statutory regulatory & various quasi-judicial bodies
  1. Team
    Best Answer
    Team Supreme

    Model Answer Introduction The constitutionalization of a Commission involves embedding it within the Constitution of India, thereby providing a robust legal and institutional framework. This process is crucial for ensuring that the Commission can effectively carry out its mandate. Steps Required forRead more

    Model Answer

    Introduction

    The constitutionalization of a Commission involves embedding it within the Constitution of India, thereby providing a robust legal and institutional framework. This process is crucial for ensuring that the Commission can effectively carry out its mandate.

    Steps Required for Constitutionalization of a Commission

    1. Drafting a Proposal:
      The initial step is to prepare a detailed proposal that outlines the necessity for constitutionalization, including the Commission’s objectives, functions, powers, and structure.
    2. Introducing a Constitutional Amendment Bill:
      A Constitutional Amendment Bill must be introduced in either house of Parliament to incorporate the Commission into the Constitution.
    3. Approval by Both Houses of Parliament:
      The Bill must be passed by both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha, requiring a majority of the total membership and a two-thirds majority of the members present and voting.
    4. Ratification by States:
      If the amendment impacts the federal structure or state powers, it must be ratified by at least half of the state legislatures.
    5. Presidential Assent:
      The final step involves obtaining the President’s assent, after which the amendment becomes part of the Constitution, thus constitutionalizing the Commission.

    Implications of Constitutionalizing the National Commission for Women (NCW)

    Constitutionalizing the NCW could significantly enhance gender justice and empowerment in India for several reasons:

    • Enhanced Authority and Credibility: As a constitutionally mandated body, the NCW would gain greater authority, leading to more effective implementation of its recommendations.
    • Autonomy and Independence: Constitutional status would provide the NCW with increased autonomy from government influence, allowing it to operate impartially.
    • Legal Protection and Enforceability: The decisions of the NCW would carry greater legal weight, facilitating enforcement and accountability for violations.
    • Increased Resources and Capacity: Constitutional bodies typically receive more substantial resources, enabling the NCW to address gender issues more effectively.
    • Greater Visibility and Awareness: As a constitutional entity, the NCW would attract more attention, promoting awareness of gender issues and fostering gender justice.

    Conclusion

    While constitutionalizing the NCW is a significant step towards achieving gender justice, it is not a standalone solution. Complementary measures, such as strengthening the legal framework and promoting gender-sensitive policies, are essential for addressing the root causes of gender inequality in India.

    See less
Team
  • 0
TeamSupreme
Asked: August 16, 2024In:
  • 0

“Recent amendments to the Right to Information Act will have profound impact on the autonomy and independence of the Information Commission”. (150 words) [UPSC 2020]

upsc: statutory regulatory & various quasi-judicial bodies
  1. Sadhna iyer
    Sadhna iyer Begginer

    Recent amendments to the Right to Information (RTI) Act have significantly impacted the autonomy and independence of the Information Commissions. Key changes include: 1. Appointment and Tenure: The amendments grant the central government increased control over the appointment, tenure, and conditionsRead more

    Recent amendments to the Right to Information (RTI) Act have significantly impacted the autonomy and independence of the Information Commissions. Key changes include:

    1. Appointment and Tenure: The amendments grant the central government increased control over the appointment, tenure, and conditions of service of the Chief Information Commissioner and Information Commissioners, which could potentially undermine their independence by centralizing power.

    2. Powers and Authority: By allowing the central government to decide the salaries and allowances of the commissioners, the amendments may influence their impartiality, as their financial and service conditions are now subject to central authority.

    3. Impact on Autonomy: These changes could weaken the Information Commissions’ ability to operate independently, as their decisions might be perceived as influenced by the central government’s interests.

    Overall, these amendments may reduce the effectiveness of the RTI Act by compromising the autonomy of the Information Commissions and potentially affecting the transparency and accountability they are meant to uphold.

    See less
Mukherjee
  • 0
MukherjeeBegginer
Asked: August 16, 2024In:
  • 0

Roadmap for Answer Writing 1. Introduction Briefly introduce the role of Human Rights Commissions (HRCs) in India. State their contributions to human rights protection while highlighting their challenges in asserting authority against powerful entities. 2. Structural and Practical Limitations of HRCs Lack of Autonomy: Explain reliance ...

upsc: statutory regulatory & various quasi-judicial bodies
  1. Team
    Best Answer
    Team Supreme

    Model Answer Introduction Rights Commissions (HRCs) in India, both at the national and state levels, play a vital role in promoting and protecting human rights. Despite their contributions, their effectiveness is often hampered by structural and practical limitations, which prevent them from assertiRead more

    Model Answer

    Introduction

    Rights Commissions (HRCs) in India, both at the national and state levels, play a vital role in promoting and protecting human rights. Despite their contributions, their effectiveness is often hampered by structural and practical limitations, which prevent them from asserting themselves against powerful entities.

    Structural and Practical Limitations

    Lack of Autonomy

    HRCs rely heavily on the government for funding, personnel, and infrastructure, leading to compromised independence and potential biases in their functioning.

    • Source: Reports on the functioning of Human Rights Commissions.

    Limited Jurisdiction

    These commissions can only investigate human rights violations by public servants, excluding cases involving private individuals or organizations, thereby limiting their scope.

    • Source: The Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993.

    Delayed Appointments

    Prolonged vacancies and delays in appointing members hinder the operational efficiency of HRCs, leaving them understaffed.

    • Source: Various media reports on vacancies in HRCs.

    Lack of Enforcement Powers

    HRCs can only make recommendations, lacking the power to enforce these or to penalize violators of human rights, which undermines their authority.

    • Source: Analysis of the enforcement capabilities of HRCs.

    Limited Awareness

    Many citizens are unaware of the existence and functions of HRCs, resulting in underutilization of these institutions.

    • Source: Surveys on public awareness regarding HRCs.

    Political Interference

    Political considerations often influence the appointment process of HRC members, affecting their impartiality and independence.

    • Source: Critiques of appointment processes in HRCs.

    Remedial Measures

    Enhance Autonomy

    Grant HRCs a separate budget and control over personnel management to bolster their independence.

    Expand Jurisdiction

    Broaden the jurisdiction to include violations by private entities, enhancing their investigative capabilities.

    Timely Appointments

    Ensure prompt appointments to fill vacancies and maintain operational effectiveness.

    Strengthen Enforcement Powers

    Empower HRCs to enforce their recommendations and penalize violators to enhance their authority.

    Awareness Campaigns

    Conduct educational programs to raise public awareness about HRCs and their functions.

    Transparent Appointment Process

    Implement a merit-based, transparent process for member appointments to minimize political interference.

    Conclusion

    By addressing these structural and practical limitations through the suggested remedial measures, Human Rights Commissions can enhance their effectiveness, assert themselves against powerful entities, and make more significant contributions to the protection of human rights in India.

    See less
Team
  • 0
TeamSupreme
Asked: August 16, 2024In:
  • 0

“The Indian Legal System has undergone significant change thanks in large part to Lok Adalats.” Explain. (125 Words) [UPPSC 2022]

uppsc: statutory regulatory & various quasi-judicial bodies
  1. Sohail Khan
    Sohail Khan Learner

    Lok Adalats as Catalysts for Change in the Indian Legal System **1. Access to Justice: Lok Adalats provide an alternative dispute resolution mechanism, offering a platform for quick and cost-effective justice. For example, National Lok Adalat held in 2023 resolved over 2 lakh cases, enhancing accessRead more

    Lok Adalats as Catalysts for Change in the Indian Legal System

    **1. Access to Justice:

    • Lok Adalats provide an alternative dispute resolution mechanism, offering a platform for quick and cost-effective justice. For example, National Lok Adalat held in 2023 resolved over 2 lakh cases, enhancing access to justice for marginalized communities.

    **2. Reduction in Case Backlog:

    • Lok Adalats help alleviate the burden on courts by settling disputes outside the formal judicial system. The Delhi Lok Adalat in 2022 successfully disposed of thousands of pending cases, reducing the case backlog.

    **3. Cost-Effectiveness:

    • They offer a no-cost resolution, which is particularly beneficial for economically weaker sections. The Maharashtra Lok Adalat system has been praised for its affordability and efficiency.

    **4. Promoting Settlement Culture:

    • Lok Adalats foster a culture of amicable settlements and mutual agreement, as seen in the Family Dispute Resolution Lok Adalats which resolve matrimonial and family disputes with a focus on reconciliation.

    **5. Increased Public Confidence:

    • By providing speedy justice and reducing litigation costs, Lok Adalats enhance public confidence in the legal system, demonstrating their role in legal reforms and efficiency.
    See less
Team
  • 0
TeamSupreme
Asked: August 13, 2024In:
  • 0

Roadmap for Answer Writing 1. Introduction Define the Competition Commission of India (CCI) and its establishment under the Competition Act of 2002. Explain the importance of CCI in ensuring fair competition and preventing abuse of dominant positions by Multi-National Corporations (MNCs). 2. Role of ...

upsc: statutory regulatory & various quasi-judicial bodies
  1. Team
    Best Answer
    Team Supreme

    Model Answer Introduction The Competition Commission of India (CCI) was established under the Competition Act of 2002 to promote fair competition and prevent practices that adversely affect competition in the Indian market. Its role is particularly crucial in regulating the abuse of dominant positioRead more

    Model Answer

    Introduction

    The Competition Commission of India (CCI) was established under the Competition Act of 2002 to promote fair competition and prevent practices that adversely affect competition in the Indian market. Its role is particularly crucial in regulating the abuse of dominant positions by Multi-National Corporations (MNCs) operating in India.

    Role of CCI in Containing Abuse of Dominant Position

    1. Advisory Role: CCI advises the government on competition policies, advocating for amendments that ensure competitive neutrality between public and private enterprises.
    2. Market Studies: The CCI conducts detailed market studies to identify competition issues, such as its examination of the e-commerce sector to address emerging challenges.
    3. Capacity Building: Collaborating with international bodies like the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, CCI enhances its personnel’s capabilities to tackle complex competition issues effectively.
    4. Consumer Welfare: CCI actively protects consumers by penalizing companies involved in anti-competitive practices, such as the cement cartel case, which resulted in inflated prices for consumers.
    5. Dispute Resolution: The CCI resolves disputes in various sectors, including the entertainment industry, ensuring adherence to fair business practices.
    6. Collaboration with Other Agencies: By working with global institutions like the European Commission, CCI fosters a comprehensive approach to combat anti-competitive practices.
    7. Public Awareness: Through initiatives like “Competition Advocacy and Awareness,” CCI educates stakeholders about competition laws and the importance of fair market practices.

    Recent Decisions Illustrating CCI’s Role

    • Amazon and Flipkart: CCI initiated a probe into alleged anti-competitive agreements between these e-commerce giants regarding exclusive mobile phone launches.
    • Automobile Sector: Investigations were launched into practices by automobile manufacturers, including Hyundai Motor India, focusing on their control over spare parts and services.
    • Telecom Sector: CCI scrutinized mergers and acquisitions in the telecom sector to prevent monopolistic tendencies and protect consumer interests.
    • Real Estate Sector: The commission investigated companies like DLF for anti-competitive practices, emphasizing the need for a level playing field for homebuyers.
    • Digital Payment Platforms: CCI examined platforms like Google Pay and Paytm to ensure fair competition and trust in digital transactions.
    • Investigative Role: In 2019, CCI investigated Google for allegedly abusing its dominant position in the mobile operating system market.
    • Regulatory Oversight: CCI reviewed the merger between Zomato and Uber Eats to assess its impact on competition in the online food delivery sector.

    Conclusion

    The Competition Commission of India plays a pivotal role in maintaining a competitive market environment by actively curbing abuses of dominant positions by MNCs. Its vigilance is essential for fostering sustainable economic development in India’s dynamic market landscape.

    See less
Load More Questions

Resources & Suggestions

Mains Answer Writing Latest Articles

On: April 18, 2025

Daily Answer Writing Practice Questions (18 April 2025)

Do you agree with the claim that indecision and risk aversion are prevalent issues in Indian bureaucracy? Support your answer with logical reasoning. (150 words) ऐसा कहा जाता है कि भारतीय नौकरशाही में अनिर्णय और जोखिम से बचने की प्रवृत्ति ...

On: April 18, 2025 Comments: 0

Strengthening India’s Cyber Defence

Rising Threats Digital Era Challenges: 2024 marks a significant rise in digital threats, particularly from AI and cyberattacks. Key Issues: Disinformation campaigns. Cyber fraud affecting daily life. Current Major Cyber Threats Ransomware Rampage: Over 48,000 instances of WannaCry ransomware detected ...

On: April 18, 2025 Comments: 0

भारत की साइबर सुरक्षा

बढ़ते खतरे कृत्रिम बुद्धिमत्ता (AI) और साइबर हमले: 2024 में AI और साइबर हमलों के खतरे में वृद्धि। महत्वपूर्ण अवसंरचना पर हमले: डिजिटल हमलों और दुष्प्रचार अभियानों की संभावना बढ़ी है। प्रमुख साइबर खतरें रैनसमवेयर का प्रकोप: 48,000 से अधिक ...

Explore Our Blog