Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
The Indian Constitution establishes a bicameral Parliament at the national level, comprising the Lok Sabha (lower house) and the Rajya Sabha (upper house). This structure ensures representation from both the national and regional perspectives, with the Lok Sabha being the more powerful house.
The clear delineation of legislative powers between the Parliament and state legislatures is a crucial feature of India’s federal system.
Talk about the makeup and duties of the Indian Parliament’s lower house, the Lok Sabha. Examine its function in the legislative process, executive supervision, and public representation. Compare it to other major parliamentary democracies’ lower houses.
Examine the Indian Constitution’s provisions on the removal of judges and the impeachment of the president. Talk about the procedures required and the Parliament’s function in using these powers. Compare it to other democratic systems’ systems for holding the executive ...
The Indian Constitution has provisions for the impeachment of the President and the removal of judges, which serve as important mechanisms for holding the head of state and the judiciary accountable. Let's examine these processes in detail and compare them with the accountability mechanisms in otherRead more
The Indian Constitution has provisions for the impeachment of the President and the removal of judges, which serve as important mechanisms for holding the head of state and the judiciary accountable. Let’s examine these processes in detail and compare them with the accountability mechanisms in other democratic systems.
Impeachment of the President in India:
The process of impeaching the President of India is outlined in Article 61 of the Constitution.
The President can be impeached for “violation of the Constitution” by a resolution passed by either house of Parliament with a two-thirds majority.
The resolution must then be investigated by a committee appointed by the President of the Lok Sabha (lower house of Parliament).
If the committee finds the charges to be true, the resolution is presented to the Lok Sabha, which must again pass it with a two-thirds majority.
The resolution is then sent to the Rajya Sabha (upper house), which must also pass it with a two-thirds majority for the impeachment to be successful.
Removal of Judges in India:
The process for the removal of Supreme Court and High Court judges is outlined in Article 124 and Article 218 of the Constitution, respectively.
Judges can be removed for “proved misbehavior or incapacity” through an impeachment process initiated in Parliament.
The process involves the introduction of a motion for the judge’s removal in either house of Parliament, which must be supported by at least 100 members of the Lok Sabha or 50 members of the Rajya Sabha.
If the motion is admitted, a judicial committee is appointed to investigate the charges, and the judge is given an opportunity to defend themselves.
If the committee finds the charges to be true, the motion for removal must be passed by a two-thirds majority in both houses of Parliament.
Comparison with Other Democratic Systems:
United States:
The U.S. Constitution provides for the impeachment of the President, Vice President, and other civil officers, including federal judges.
The impeachment process is initiated in the House of Representatives and requires a simple majority vote. The trial is then conducted in the Senate, with a two-thirds majority required for conviction.
United Kingdom:
The UK does not have a formal impeachment process for the head of state (the monarch) or the judiciary.
The parliamentary mechanisms for holding the government accountable include motions of no-confidence, amendments to legislation, and the power of the courts to review the legality of government actions.
Germany:
The German Basic Law (constitution) allows for the impeachment of the Federal President for willful violation of the Basic Law or any other federal law.
The impeachment process is initiated in the Bundestag (lower house of parliament) and requires a two-thirds majority for a trial in the Bundesrat (upper house).
Comparison and Takeaways:
The Indian Constitution’s provisions for the impeachment of the President and the removal of judges are relatively more stringent, requiring a higher threshold of support in Parliament compared to the U.S. system.
The role of the judiciary in the impeachment process, through the appointment of an independent committee to investigate the charges, adds an additional layer of scrutiny and helps ensure due process.
The absence of a formal impeachment process in the UK highlights the country’s reliance on other parliamentary and judicial mechanisms to hold the head of state and the judiciary accountable.
The German system, with its two-thirds majority requirement in both houses of parliament, is similar to the Indian model in terms of the high threshold for impeachment.
Overall, the Indian Constitution’s provisions for holding the head of state and the judiciary accountable through impeachment reflect a balance between ensuring stability and maintaining checks and balances within the democratic framework.
Answer the question in maximum 200 words. This question carries 11 marks. [MPPSC 2023] “Indian Parliament can amend the Constitution, but not its basic structure” statement.
The statement "Indian Parliament can amend the Constitution, but not its basic structure" reflects a key principle established by the Indian judiciary regarding the power of constitutional amendments in India. This principle has its origins in the landmark Supreme Court case of Kesavananda Bharati vRead more
The statement “Indian Parliament can amend the Constitution, but not its basic structure” reflects a key principle established by the Indian judiciary regarding the power of constitutional amendments in India. This principle has its origins in the landmark Supreme Court case of Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973). Here’s a detailed commentary on this principle:
The principle that “Indian Parliament can amend the Constitution, but not its basic structure” serves as a safeguard to preserve the essential framework and values of the Constitution. It balances the need for constitutional adaptability with the necessity to maintain core democratic principles. This doctrine underscores the enduring nature of the Constitution’s foundational principles and provides a crucial check on the power of constitutional amendments.
See lessAnalyze the composition and authority of the Rajya Sabha, the Indian Parliament’s upper house. Assess its function in the legislative process, state representation, and government supervision. Compare it to other federal democracies’ senates or upper houses.
The Indian Constitution has provisions for the creation of new states and the reorganization of existing state boundaries. These provisions are primarily laid out in Article 2, Article 3, and the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution. Provisions for the Creation of New States: Article 2 of the ConstiRead more
The Indian Constitution has provisions for the creation of new states and the reorganization of existing state boundaries. These provisions are primarily laid out in Article 2, Article 3, and the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution.
Provisions for the Creation of New States:
Article 2 of the Constitution empowers the Parliament to admit new states into the Union of India or to establish new states.
Article 3 allows the Parliament to form new states by separating territory from any state or by uniting two or more states or parts of states. This can be done through an act of Parliament.
The Constitution also provides for the alteration of state boundaries and the name of any state through a law passed by the Parliament.
Factors Influencing the Formation of New States:
Linguistic and Cultural Differences: The reorganization of states along linguistic lines has been a significant factor in the formation of new states. States like Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, and Chhattisgarh were created to address the linguistic and cultural aspirations of the people.
Geographical and Administrative Considerations: The size, geographic location, and administrative convenience have also played a role in the creation of new states. For example, the formation of Uttarakhand and Jharkhand was partly driven by the need for better administrative control and governance in these regions.
Political and Ethnic Movements: Demands for self-governance and autonomy by various ethnic and regional groups have often led to the creation of new states. The formation of states like Nagaland, Meghalaya, and Mizoram was influenced by the political and ethnic movements in these regions.
Socio-economic Factors: Disparities in the levels of economic development, access to resources, and the equitable distribution of benefits have also contributed to the creation of new states. The formation of Telangana, for instance, was driven by the perceived imbalance in the distribution of resources and opportunities between the two regions of the erstwhile Andhra Pradesh.
Administrative Efficiency: The need for better administrative control and efficient governance has been a crucial factor in the reorganization of state boundaries. The creation of states like Chhattisgarh and Uttarakhand was aimed at improving the delivery of public services and addressing regional imbalances.
The process of state formation and reorganization in India has been an ongoing and dynamic one, reflecting the diverse social, political, and economic realities of the country. The Constitution’s provisions have allowed for the gradual evolution of the Indian federal structure, addressing the unique aspirations and needs of different regions and communities.
Roadmap for Answer Writing 1. Introduction (Brief Background on the Anti-Defection Law) Provide a brief overview of the Tenth Schedule of the Indian Constitution, which contains the Anti-Defection Law (1985). State its primary objective: to curb political defections and promote political stability by ...
Model Answer Introduction: Understanding the Anti-Defection Law The Anti-Defection Law, introduced under the Tenth Schedule of the Indian Constitution by the 52nd Amendment Act of 1985, aims to prevent political defections by disqualifying MPs and MLAs who switch parties after elections. The law intRead more
The Anti-Defection Law, introduced under the Tenth Schedule of the Indian Constitution by the 52nd Amendment Act of 1985, aims to prevent political defections by disqualifying MPs and MLAs who switch parties after elections. The law intends to promote political stability and safeguard the mandate given by voters. However, its implications for democracy have been hotly debated. Critics argue that it restricts legislators’ independence, consolidates power within party leadership, and curtails democratic decision-making.
One of the primary criticisms of the Anti-Defection Law is that it inhibits the freedom of legislators to make independent choices. MPs and MLAs are compelled to vote in line with their party’s directives, even if it conflicts with their personal convictions or their constituency’s interests. This restriction diminishes the legislator’s ability to represent their electorate effectively, as they become more beholden to the party leadership than to the people who elected them. The law effectively creates a disconnect between the representatives and their voters, undermining the core principles of democratic representation.
By forcing legislators to follow the party line, the Anti-Defection Law diminishes their role in the legislative process. MPs and MLAs are discouraged from participating in detailed debates or offering independent opinions on issues, as their voting behavior is strictly controlled by the party leadership. This diminishes the quality of debate in legislative bodies and reduces the effectiveness of parliamentary oversight, a key feature of democratic governance.
The Anti-Defection Law has also contributed to the centralization of power within political parties. Party leaders hold significant sway over individual legislators, as MPs and MLAs risk disqualification for voting against the party. This has allowed political leaders to exert disproportionate control over the decision-making process, sidelining individual legislators and concentrating power in the hands of a few. This centralization can limit diverse perspectives within the legislature, weakening the overall democratic structure.
While the Anti-Defection Law has helped reduce defections motivated by personal gain and instability, it has unintended consequences that undermine democratic values. Reforms, such as transferring the authority to disqualify legislators to the President or Governor and involving the Election Commission in the decision-making process, could help address these concerns. A more balanced approach is necessary to ensure that the law serves its intended purpose without eroding democratic principles.
See lessRoadmap for Answer Writing Step 1: Introduction Briefly define delimitation and its purpose. Mention the constitutional and procedural context of delimitation (such as the freeze on delimitation after the 1971 Census, the 84th Constitutional Amendment of 2002, and the planned delimitation after the ...
Model Answer Issues Associated with Census-Based Delimitation of Lok Sabha Constituencies Census-based delimitation aims to redraw the boundaries of Lok Sabha constituencies to ensure nearly equal voter representation. However, this approach raises several concerns: 1. Disincentivizing Population CoRead more
Census-based delimitation aims to redraw the boundaries of Lok Sabha constituencies to ensure nearly equal voter representation. However, this approach raises several concerns:
Northern states like Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, and Madhya Pradesh have higher population growth rates (12-15% every decade), while southern states like Tamil Nadu and Kerala have slower growth rates (6-10%). This disparity leads to a skewed representation, where higher-population states, primarily in the north, would gain more seats, further entrenching their political power. This dynamic reduces the incentive for southern states to control population growth, as they may lose out on seat allocations in future redistributions.
The scheduled delimitation after 2026 is expected to cause a significant redistribution of seats, with northern states likely to gain over 30 seats at the expense of southern states. For example, states like Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh may lose approximately 24 seats. This redistribution could result in a regional imbalance, weakening the political voice of the southern states in the national legislature.
The seat redistribution will disproportionately affect the southern states, potentially diminishing the influence of regional parties, which are stronger in these areas. The increased dominance of northern political parties could marginalize regional interests, skewing the political landscape in favor of larger, more populous states.
The process of delimitation also influences the allocation of seats reserved for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (SC/ST). Changes in constituency boundaries could alter the representation of marginalized communities, potentially diluting their political presence in Parliament.
In conclusion, while census-based delimitation aims for equal voter representation, it risks amplifying regional imbalances and diminishing the power of certain states and communities. A more nuanced approach is needed to ensure fair and inclusive representation.
See lessRoadmap for Answer Writing 1. Introduction: Contextualizing the Question (30-40 words) Start with a brief introduction about the role of Parliament in the democratic setup. Define its core functions: deliberative lawmaking and holding the executive accountable. Mention the increasing concerns over the decline in ...
Model Answer Decline in Parliamentary Functioning and its Impact on Lawmaking and Accountability The effective functioning of Parliament is essential for fulfilling its role in deliberative lawmaking and holding the executive accountable. However, recent trends indicate that a decline in parliamentaRead more
The effective functioning of Parliament is essential for fulfilling its role in deliberative lawmaking and holding the executive accountable. However, recent trends indicate that a decline in parliamentary operations is undermining these critical responsibilities.
One of the most significant factors affecting parliamentary functioning is the decreasing number of sitting days. According to the PRS (Public Affairs Centre), the Lok Sabha’s annual sitting days have sharply fallen from 121 days between 1952-70 to just 56 days in 2022. This reduction in sitting time leaves limited opportunities for MPs to debate and scrutinize important legislation or question the executive (PRS, 2022). Furthermore, the rapid passage of bills, with the Lok Sabha passing laws in less than 10 minutes on average, bypasses the necessary scrutiny. This hasty approach diminishes the role of Parliament as a deliberative body and weakens accountability mechanisms.
Another factor is the increasing reliance on ordinances, which limits Parliament’s ability to debate and hold the executive accountable. Between 2014-2021, 76 ordinances were issued, often circumventing parliamentary processes and reducing opportunities for opposition to question executive actions (PRS, 2021). Additionally, the sidelining of parliamentary committees, such as the Standing Committees, further weakens scrutiny. Only 27% of bills were referred to committees in the 16th Lok Sabha, compared to 71% in the 15th Lok Sabha (PRS, 2019).
The growing dominance of the ruling party, especially through the use of the money bill route, has further weakened the role of the Rajya Sabha, which traditionally acted as a counterbalance to the Lok Sabha. The lack of short duration discussions—only 6 since 2019—has also stifled the opposition’s ability to raise urgent national issues (PRS, 2019). Moreover, the absence of private members’ bills being passed for over fifty years highlights the diminishing space for non-government voices in lawmaking.
In conclusion, these trends point to a significant erosion of parliamentary functions, limiting its ability to act as a deliberative body and an effective check on the executive. Strengthening parliamentary norms and ensuring adequate time for debates, scrutiny, and opposition involvement are crucial for restoring its accountability role.
See lessRoadmap for Answer Writing 1. Introduction (2-3 sentences) Start with the concept of parliamentary oversight: Briefly explain the role of parliamentary oversight in the Indian system of governance and its importance in ensuring that the Executive is accountable to the Legislature. Introduce the ...
Model Answers Introduction: Parliamentary oversight in India plays a crucial role in ensuring the accountability of the Executive. Through various mechanisms such as Question Hour, Committees, and motions, Parliament holds the Executive responsible for its actions and policies. However, the effectivRead more
Parliamentary oversight in India plays a crucial role in ensuring the accountability of the Executive. Through various mechanisms such as Question Hour, Committees, and motions, Parliament holds the Executive responsible for its actions and policies. However, the effectiveness of these measures has been limited due to various challenges.
While parliamentary oversight is vital for Executive accountability, its effectiveness can be significantly improved by addressing current limitations. Strengthening the Committee system, reducing disruptions, and empowering the Opposition are key steps towards better governance.
See lessRoadmap for Answer Writing Introduction Define parliamentary privileges. Briefly mention their purpose and significance in the legislative framework. Types of Parliamentary Privileges Collective Privileges: Explain collective privileges such as exclusion of strangers, holding secret sittings, and the power to regulate proceedings. Individual Privileges: Discuss individual privileges like protection ...
Model Answer Parliamentary Privileges Parliamentary privileges are special rights and immunities granted to members of Parliament, enabling them to perform their duties effectively. These privileges extend to individuals participating in parliamentary proceedings, such as the Attorney General and MiRead more
Parliamentary privileges are special rights and immunities granted to members of Parliament, enabling them to perform their duties effectively. These privileges extend to individuals participating in parliamentary proceedings, such as the Attorney General and Ministers. Breaches of these privileges are punishable under parliamentary law, as outlined in Article 105 for Parliament and Article 194 for State Legislatures.
Codifying parliamentary privileges is essential to address their ambiguity and potential misuse. Article 105(3) implies the need for a clear legal framework, as the privileges are often interpreted based on outdated House of Commons practices. Other democracies, like Australia and Canada, have codified similar privileges to enhance accountability.
Misuse of these privileges, such as in the 1998 Supreme Court case of P.V. Narasimha Rao vs. CBI, highlights the risk of evading accountability and undermining democratic values. Therefore, establishing clear guidelines can help protect citizens’ rights while ensuring lawmakers are held to ethical standards.
In conclusion, the codification of parliamentary privileges is vital for clarity and accountability, ensuring they serve their intended purpose without infringing on democratic principles.
See lessDo department-related parliamentary standing committees keep the administration on its toes and inspire reverence for parliamentary control? Evaluate the working of such committees with suitable examples.
The Committees Standing, especially those that are related to government departments, assist in ensuring that the administration is made to answer and operate correctly in line with the laws. These Committees act as connecting links between the legislature and the executive branch of the governmentRead more
The Committees Standing, especially those that are related to government departments, assist in ensuring that the administration is made to answer and operate correctly in line with the laws. These Committees act as connecting links between the legislature and the executive branch of the government in facilitating continuous oversight and scrutiny of them. In assessing the working of the committees, we may tell if they indeed keep the administration in a living scrutiny and would, additionally, instill a greater respect for parliamentary control.
The Role of the Department-Related Parliamentary Standing Committees
Department-related parliamentary standing committees are permanent functional bodies of Parliament focusing on and dealing with the business of specific governmental departments or policy areas. The standing committees essentially initiate with consideration of legislation, monitoring government actions and programs, examining proposals for the budget, and inquiring into other matters of public concern. Standing committees are usually composed of elected Members of Parliament representing different political parties and viewpoints.
The activities of the committees include oversight and holding accountable the government for its organization of affairs and will never be subserved. The Public Accounts Committee has laid down an inflexible examination of public expenditure. It is empowered to summon witnesses-including most importantly, high-ranking government officials and chief officers of departments-to give their testimonies and reasoning for variations on the books relating to public spending or inefficiencies in the management. The constant oversight carries with it the continued discovery of possibilities for reform and improvement in the administration, therefore keeping it on its toes.
Legislative Consideration:The Department-related committees, in this case, review and provide recommendations concerning proposed legislation. The Department-Related Standing Committees are crucial to this function in India. For example, the DRSC on Home Affairs reviewed the Citizenship (Amendment Bill), 2019, and put together a detailed report raising myriad concerns and offering suggestions. The process forces the government to explain and refine its bills, compelling them into line with the public interest and the constraints of legality.
Policy Monitoring:Let there be these committees to further oversight the implementations of government policies and programs. In Australia, for example, Senate Standing Committees on Finance and Public Administration follow that regular examination of the soundness of government initiatives. Their inquiry into the implementation of the National Disability Insurance Scheme had it highlighted quite a number of issues that subsequently led to recommendations for policy readjustments. The never-ending strictures of such monitoring assure the administration would stick to accomplishing the outcomes it has pledged.
Inspiring Respect for Parliamentary Control
Public Trust: Works of department-related committees generally inspire greater public trust where the legislative process and government accountability take shape. Live broadcasts and dissemination of reports of committee hearings can offer better insight into how parliamentary control functions. In the United States, the House Committee on Oversight and Reform has garnered media attention as a result of its preferential inquiries, leading to reforms and quite a few notable changes in policy.
Bipartisan Cooperation: Most of the time, the committees are thus bipartisan; they happen to bring together individuals from opposing political parties in a partnership that helps find a common cause. Through such a path of cooperation, respect for parliamentary procedures and the rule of law could gain an impetus. An example includes the Canadian Standing Committee on Public Accounts, which has always been characterized by bipartisan cooperation critical to maintaining the integrity of the committee’s work and holding the government to the same standards, regardless of the party in power.
Power to Initiate Inquiries: It can be said that department-related committees yield an extensive impact with their improved public awareness initiatives, culminating in findings and recommendations of resounding worth. The thorough probing of certain administrative actions and decisions can serve as a specific deterrent to officeholders’ misbehavior and also serve to inspire good governance. An example of this would be a lot of inquiries conducted by the Portfolio Committee on Police on police brutality and corruption in South Africa that in all instances led to policy changes and the outworking of new oversight mechanisms.
Challenges and Limitations
In addition to being a critical part for the democratic nature of governance with their beneficial functions and operational advice are fraught with various challenges:
Resource Constraints: From time to time, with little space to manoeuvre, these Committees can make it less effective from-the-core attention and frequency in terms of their oversight. Sufficient funding and appropriate staffing can mediate the effective functioning of a Committee.
Political Interference: There is the possibility of political interference whereby committee members might prioritize the interest of the party over that of public scrutiny. This can be tackled through balanced party representation within the Committee with a stringent code of conduct in place.
Executive Resistance: Occasionally, answers to committee interrogatories are rejected or delayed by the executive, to the detriment of profitable operations on the part of the committee itself. Stronger parliamentary rules and support from legislative leadership are most required to address such resistance.
Conclusion
The parliamentary standing committees, related to concerned ministries or departments, have been the right balance of power existing between the legislature and executive branches of government. Continuous oversight, review of legislations, and monitoring of policies keep the administration quite alert. In the course of time, this work has mostly nurtured a State respect for parliamentary control, showcasing its credibility and accountability in matters of governance. However, for their optimal functioning with the fullest potential being attained, overcoming resource constraints, political interference, and executive resistance is important. When this happens, they can prove to be significant in enhancing the effectiveness and legitimacy of governance so that it functions with great diligence towards serving public interests.
The Lok Sabha: India's Engine of Legislation and Representation The Lok Sabha, the lower house of the Indian Parliament, plays a pivotal role in the country's democratic fabric. Let's delve into its composition, functions, and compare it with similar houses in other major democracies. Composition: MRead more
The Lok Sabha: India’s Engine of Legislation and Representation
The Lok Sabha, the lower house of the Indian Parliament, plays a pivotal role in the country’s democratic fabric. Let’s delve into its composition, functions, and compare it with similar houses in other major democracies.
Composition:
Maximum Strength: The Constitution allows for a maximum of 552 seats, although currently, there are 543 elected members.
Representation: Members are elected from geographical constituencies across states and union territories. A certain number of seats are reserved for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes to ensure their representation.
Term: The Lok Sabha has a term of five years unless dissolved earlier.
Functions:
Lawmaking: The Lok Sabha plays a primary role in initiating and passing legislation. Money bills must originate in the Lok Sabha.
Oversight of the Executive: The Lok Sabha holds the executive accountable through mechanisms like question hour, discussions, and passing no-confidence motions.
Financial Control: The house approves the national budget and plays a crucial role in scrutinizing government spending.
Electorate of the Rajya Sabha: The Lok Sabha elects members to the upper house, the Rajya Sabha.
Forum for Debate: It provides a platform for public debate on key issues and articulates the concerns of the people.
Legislative Process:
Introduction of Bills: Bills can be introduced by either house, but money bills must originate in the Lok Sabha.
Debate and Discussion: Bills are debated and discussed in detail by members before being voted upon.
Passage and Assent: After passing both houses, bills require the President’s assent to become law.
Oversight of the Executive:
Question Hour: Members can ask questions of government ministers, holding them accountable for their actions.
Adjournment Motions: These motions raise urgent matters of public importance for discussion.
No-Confidence Motion: The Lok Sabha can express its lack of confidence in the government through a no-confidence motion. If passed, the government must resign.
Representation of the People:
Direct Elections: Members are directly elected by the people, ensuring a strong link between the electorate and their representatives.
Diversity: The Lok Sabha aims to represent the diverse population of India, with reserved seats for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes.
Comparison with Lower Houses in Other Democracies:
UK House of Commons: Similarities include direct elections, dominance in lawmaking, and holding the executive accountable. However, the UK system has a two-party dominant model, unlike India’s multi-party system.
US House of Representatives: Similar functions in lawmaking and oversight exist. However, the US has a separation of powers system, giving the President significant veto power over legislation.
Key Differences:
Strength of the Lower House: India’s Lok Sabha is more powerful than the US House of Representatives due to the weaker position of the President in India’s parliamentary system.
Party System: The multi-party system in India often leads to coalition governments, creating a more complex dynamic compared to the two-party dominant model in the UK.
Conclusion:
The Lok Sabha is the cornerstone of India’s parliamentary democracy. It plays a crucial role in lawmaking, holding the executive accountable, and representing the diverse voices of the people. While differences exist with other parliamentary systems, the Lok Sabha remains a vital forum for debate, legislation, and ensuring the government remains responsive to the needs of the Indian people.
See less