Home/Indian Polity/Indian Constitution/Page 8
Indian Constitution
The Constitution of India is the supreme law of the land, adopted in 1950 and establishing the framework of the Indian government. It outlines the powers and responsibilities of the executive, legislative, and judicial branches, and can be amended through a rigorous process.
The Constitution safeguards the fundamental rights of citizens and serves as the foundation for India’s vibrant democracy, federal structure, and decentralized governance system.
Share
Why didn’t Dr. Ambedkar include the word “secularism” in the constitution?
Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, the principal architect of the Indian Constitution, did not explicitly include the word "secularism" in the original text of the Constitution when it was adopted in 1950. However, the principles of secularism were embedded in the Constitution through various provisions. ReaRead more
Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, the principal architect of the Indian Constitution, did not explicitly include the word “secularism” in the original text of the Constitution when it was adopted in 1950. However, the principles of secularism were embedded in the Constitution through various provisions.
Reasons for Not Including the Word “Secularism” Initially
1. Implicit Secularism: The Constitution already embodied secular principles. For instance, it guaranteed freedom of religion under Articles 25 to 28, prohibited discrimination on religious grounds under Articles 14 and 15, and abolished untouchability under Article 17.
2. Socio-political Context: The immediate post-independence period was a sensitive time for India, with the country recovering from partition-related violence and communal tensions. Explicitly stating “secularism” might have been seen as unnecessary or potentially divisive at that time.
3. Comprehensive Approach: The framers of the Constitution chose to embed the spirit of secularism throughout the document rather than through a single term. This was meant to ensure that secular values permeated the entire constitutional framework.
Addition of the Term in 1976
The term “secularism” was explicitly added to the Preamble of the Indian Constitution by the 42nd Amendment Act of 1976 during the Emergency period under Prime Minister Indira Gandhi’s government.
1. Political Context: The political environment of the mid-1970s, marked by the Emergency (1975-1977), saw significant constitutional and political changes. Adding the term “secularism” was part of a broader set of amendments aimed at emphasizing certain values and principles in the face of contemporary challenges.
2. Clarification of Values: By explicitly stating “secularism” in the Preamble, the government sought to clarify and reinforce the commitment of the Indian state to a secular ethos, ensuring that the separation of religion and state was clearly understood as a fundamental principle of governance.
3. Constitutional Clarity: The inclusion of the term helped in providing constitutional clarity and emphasis on the secular character of the Indian state, especially in a period when there were debates and discussions about the role of religion in politics.
Thus, while Dr. Ambedkar and the original framers chose to incorporate secular principles implicitly throughout the Constitution, the explicit addition of the term “secularism” in 1976 served to highlight and reaffirm these principles in a changing political and social landscape.
See lessLegality
Legalizing Same-Sex Marriages in India: Arguments and Perspectives 1. Introduction: The question of whether same-sex marriages should be legalized in India is a complex and sensitive issue involving legal, social, and ethical dimensions. Legalizing same-sex marriages would have significant implicatiRead more
Legalizing Same-Sex Marriages in India: Arguments and Perspectives
1. Introduction:
The question of whether same-sex marriages should be legalized in India is a complex and sensitive issue involving legal, social, and ethical dimensions. Legalizing same-sex marriages would have significant implications for individual rights, societal norms, and legal frameworks in the country.
2. Legal and Human Rights Perspectives:
Constitutional Rights: Legalizing same-sex marriages aligns with the principles enshrined in the Indian Constitution, particularly the right to equality under Article 14 and the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21. The Supreme Court’s landmark judgment in Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (2018) decriminalized consensual same-sex relations, affirming the importance of individual autonomy and equality.
Global Trends: Many countries, including Australia, Germany, and Canada, have legalized same-sex marriages, reflecting a global trend towards recognizing equal rights for same-sex couples. Legalizing same-sex marriages in India would align it with international human rights standards and reinforce its commitment to global norms.
3. Social and Cultural Perspectives:
Social Acceptance: Legalizing same-sex marriages could foster greater social acceptance and reduce stigma against LGBTQ+ individuals. It would acknowledge and validate diverse sexual orientations, contributing to a more inclusive and egalitarian society.
Cultural Sensitivity: India’s diverse cultural landscape includes varying attitudes towards same-sex relationships. While some regions may be conservative, others have shown progressive attitudes. For instance, the Kolkata Pride Parade and other LGBTQ+ events have gained visibility and support, reflecting changing societal attitudes.
4. Legal and Practical Considerations:
Legal Framework: Implementing same-sex marriage laws would require comprehensive changes to existing legal frameworks, including family law, inheritance rights, and social benefits. It would necessitate amendments to laws governing marriage, adoption, and property rights.
Marriage and Adoption Rights: Legalizing same-sex marriages would grant couples rights related to inheritance, adoption, and healthcare benefits. For example, same-sex couples in countries where marriage is legal have access to joint tax benefits, inheritance rights, and the ability to make medical decisions for their partners.
5. Recent Developments:
Legal Petitions: Several petitions have been filed in Indian courts seeking the legalization of same-sex marriages. For example, the Navtej Singh Johar case and subsequent petitions argue for the recognition of same-sex marriages as a matter of equality and human rights.
Government Stance: The Indian government’s stance on this issue has been cautious. While there has been some progressive movement, such as decriminalizing homosexuality, official positions on same-sex marriage remain conservative. However, civil society organizations and activists continue to advocate for legal recognition and equality.
International Influence: International pressure and diplomatic relations also play a role. For instance, global organizations and advocacy groups have increasingly supported LGBTQ+ rights, influencing policy discussions in various countries, including India.
6. Conclusion:
Legalizing same-sex marriages in India is a matter of human rights, equality, and social justice. It aligns with constitutional principles and global human rights standards, and it would promote a more inclusive society. However, implementing such changes requires addressing legal, cultural, and social challenges. The evolving discourse and advocacy around LGBTQ+ rights indicate a gradual shift towards recognizing and ensuring equal rights for all individuals, including same-sex couples.
See lessElucidate the role of the Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSPs) in the governance of India. How do they complement the Fundamental Rights?
Answer-The Directive Principles of State Policy borrowed from Ireland is an unique feature of the Indian Constitution. Article 36-51 belong to Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP). It intents to lead the Nation towards the establishment of a just Equitable Society. The part-IV of Indian ConsRead more
Answer-The Directive Principles of State Policy borrowed from Ireland is an unique feature of the Indian Constitution. Article 36-51 belong to Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP).
It intents to lead the Nation towards the establishment of a just Equitable Society.
The part-IV of Indian Constitution belongs to Directive Principles of State Policy.
They are non-justiciable similar to Fundamental Duties.
The main aim of Directive Principles of State Policy is to establish a Welfare State.
It emphasizes and encourages the state to take positive actions for the betterment of society.
They are ideals which are not legally enforceable by the courts for their violation.
The types and features of DPSP are mentioned here-
Fundamental Rights and DPSP are considered complementary to each other.
DPSP discusses the goals and principles the state should attempt to achieve in the social and economic fields.
And Fundamental Rights focus on individual rights and liberties.
Fundamental Rights are stated as limitations on State action whereas Directive Principles navigate the state to work with proper policies for the betterment of country’s people.
They both work for the Social and Economic Welfare of the people of the country in different spheres.
They both promote welfare and development of the community.
See lessAre quotas helping the disadvantaged women?
Quotas, particularly gender quotas in politics and business, can significantly benefit disadvantaged women by ensuring increased representation, influencing inclusive policies, and challenging traditional gender stereotypes. They create visibility and provide role models, which can inspire other womRead more
Quotas, particularly gender quotas in politics and business, can significantly benefit disadvantaged women by ensuring increased representation, influencing inclusive policies, and challenging traditional gender stereotypes. They create visibility and provide role models, which can inspire other women. Quotas also help in advocating for policies that address issues affecting women, thus potentially improving economic opportunities and reducing poverty. However, there are criticisms, such as concerns about meritocracy and perceptions of tokenism. Implementation issues may arise if quotas primarily benefit women from privileged backgrounds, and resistance can lead to tokenistic compliance. Quotas are often seen as a temporary measure and may not address the root causes of gender inequality without broader cultural and institutional shifts. Examples like Rwanda’s political quotas and Norway’s corporate quotas show increased women’s representation leading to more inclusive policies and improved corporate performance. Overall, while quotas can be a powerful tool for promoting gender equality, their success hinges on careful design and implementation, forming part of a comprehensive strategy including education, mentorship, and policy reforms to create lasting change.
See lessImpact of co-habitation on Parliamentary form of Government
Co-habitation in a parliamentary form of government refers to a situation where the head of state and the head of government come from opposing political parties. This typically occurs in semi-presidential systems, where a president (head of state) and a prime minister (head of government) must coexRead more
Co-habitation in a parliamentary form of government refers to a situation where the head of state and the head of government come from opposing political parties. This typically occurs in semi-presidential systems, where a president (head of state) and a prime minister (head of government) must coexist and share power despite their differing political affiliations.
Co-habitation can impact the smooth functioning of the parliamentary system in several ways. It often leads to political gridlock and policy stagnation, as the president and prime minister may have conflicting agendas and priorities. This can result in difficulties in passing legislation and implementing policies effectively. Additionally, co-habitation can create tension and power struggles within the government, undermining cooperation and unity.
However, it can also foster compromise and negotiation, encouraging diverse viewpoints and broader representation. Ultimately, the success of co-habitation depends on the willingness of both parties to work together for the country’s benefit.
See lessJudiciary
Enhancing the Indian judiciary machine, frequently criticized for delays and complicated approaches, requires a multi-faceted approach. Key strategies consist of: 1.Digitization and generation Integration: imposing e-courts and digital case management structures can streamline approaches, reduce papRead more
Enhancing the Indian judiciary machine, frequently criticized for delays and complicated approaches, requires a multi-faceted approach. Key strategies consist of:
1.Digitization and generation Integration: imposing e-courts and digital case management structures can streamline approaches, reduce paperwork, and enhance transparency. virtual hearings, already adopted in the course of the pandemic, need to be extended.
2. Growing Judicial potential: Appointing extra judges and establishing additional courts, mainly at the decrease degrees, can assist manage the caseload efficaciously. Specialised speedy-tune courts for precise kinds of instances, like the ones concerning women and children, also can expedite proceedings.
3. Judicial Reforms and schooling: non-stop training and ability building for judges and court docket team of workers in modern-day judicial practices and era can improve efficiency. Judicial responsibility mechanisms can make sure well timed delivery of judgments.
4. Alternative Dispute decision (ADR): selling ADR mechanisms like arbitration, mediation, and conciliation can reduce the load on courts. these methods offer faster, fee-powerful resolutions, especially for civil and commercial disputes.
5. Simplification of strategies: Reforming procedural legal guidelines to put off needless complexities and delays is important. This includes lowering adjournments and making sure stricter timelines for case disposal.
Enforcing these measures can assist create a greater green, obvious, and responsive judicial device in India.
See less– What measures does the new budget include to support farmers and the agricultural sector?
The new budget for 2024 includes several significant measures aimed at supporting farmers and enhancing the agricultural sector: Increased Funding: The budget allocates ₹1.52 lakh crore to agriculture and allied sectors, marking a 20% increase from the previous year. This funding aims to improve proRead more
The new budget for 2024 includes several significant measures aimed at supporting farmers and enhancing the agricultural sector:
These measures collectively aim to modernize Indian agriculture, improve farmers’ income, and ensure food security while fostering sustainability and self-reliance.
See lessJudiciary
Improving the Indian Judiciary System: 1. Technology Integration: Implementing digital case management systems and e-filing to streamline processes and reduce paperwork. Examples like the National Judicial Data Grid (NJDG) for case information accessibility and virtual court hearings during the COVIRead more
Improving the Indian Judiciary System:
1. Technology Integration:
Implementing digital case management systems and e-filing to streamline processes and reduce paperwork.
Examples like the National Judicial Data Grid (NJDG) for case information accessibility and virtual court hearings during the COVID-19 pandemic showcase the benefits of technology integration.
2. Fast-Track Courts and Specialized Tribunals:
Establishing more fast-track courts to expedite the resolution of pending cases, especially those involving vulnerable groups like women, children, and senior citizens.
Specialized tribunals for specific areas like environmental issues (NGT) and commercial disputes (NCLT) have shown effectiveness in handling complex cases efficiently.
3. Judicial Reforms and Structural Changes:
Implementing judicial reforms to address the backlog of cases and improve the efficiency of the judiciary.
Examples include the Malimath Committee recommendations for criminal justice reforms and the Law Commission’s suggestions for judicial accountability.
4. Strengthening Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Mechanisms:
Promoting mediation, arbitration, and conciliation as alternative methods for resolving disputes outside the traditional court system.
Initiatives like the commercial courts for speedy resolution of commercial disputes and Lok Adalats for amicable settlements demonstrate the effectiveness of ADR mechanisms.
5. Capacity Building and Infrastructure Development:
Enhancing the infrastructure of courts and legal institutions to support the efficient functioning of the judiciary.
Recent initiatives such as the construction of new court complexes, digitization of records, and training programs for judicial officers contribute to capacity building and infrastructure development.
6. Transparency and Accountability:
Promoting transparency in judicial proceedings and decisions to enhance public trust in the judiciary.
Measures like live streaming of court proceedings, public access to judgments through websites, and the Right to Information Act contribute to accountability and transparency in the judicial system.
7. Judicial Appointments and Vacancies:
Addressing the issue of judicial vacancies by expediting the appointment process to ensure a full strength of judges in courts.
See lessReforms in the collegium system, timely filling of vacancies, and ensuring diversity in appointments are essential for a robust and efficient judiciary.
By implementing these reforms and strategies, the Indian judiciary system can address the challenges of delays and procedural complexities, ultimately enhancing access to justice, efficiency, and trust in the legal system.
Define sovereignty, secularism and fraternity briefly with respect to the Indian Constitution.
our constitution starts with "we the people of india" and highlights the basic structure of constitution with the words such as "Sovereignty, Secularism and Fraternity" in the preamble. SOVEREIGNTY We the people of India refers about Sovereignty of the people of India. Sovereignty means the people oRead more
our constitution starts with “we the people of india” and highlights the basic structure of constitution with the words such as “Sovereignty, Secularism and Fraternity” in the preamble.
SOVEREIGNTY
We the people of India refers about Sovereignty of the people of India.
Secularism
Secular state is an extension of idea of equality and liberty, because liberty stand for freedom of choice including freedom of conscience and faith, Every citizen is free to choose his/her worship and constitution gives us freedom to profess, practice and propagate religion (Article 25)
There is two model of secularism
India is somewhere closer to French model of secularism because state is allowed to interfere in the religious activity but it also somewhere provide some autonomy to religion also. Indian model is based on the equal respect towards every religion, moreover (Article 29-30) gives special protection for the people belonging to minority community.
Fraternity
Equality and social justice are basic condition for the promotion of Fraternity among the people of india, it is an sprit of brotherhood among the citizens, Unity symbolises the physical and territorial unity but fraternity is a matter of psychological and emotional bond with the nation.
As we see the term Sovereignty, Secularism and Fraternity is the basic structure of our constitution and which cannot be amended by the act of parliament, as well as they are the basic feature of our constitution which allows inclusivity in our country.
See lessQueer Community
The LGBTQ+ community suffers greatly and is frequently the target of hate crimes committed not only in India but also worldwide. There is a significant percentage of hate and conceit against these minorities. Although a few of countries have formally acknowledged third gender and homosexuals as equaRead more
The LGBTQ+ community suffers greatly and is frequently the target of hate crimes committed not only in India but also worldwide. There is a significant percentage of hate and conceit against these minorities. Although a few of countries have formally acknowledged third gender and homosexuals as equal citizens. Only when there is political and economic justice can there be social justice. Since the 2010s, LGBTQ+ people in India have experienced an increase in societal acceptance and tolerance. Under the Transgender Person (Protection of Rights) Act of 2019, the right to self-perceived gender identity is recognised. When a certificate from a qualified medical professional is received, government organisations can issue new identification documents verifying a gender transition.
See less