The Indian Constitution is notable for several unique features that reflect its complexity and the diverse nature of the Indian polity. Here’s a discussion of its distinctive characteristics: 1. Length and Detail The Indian Constitution is one of the longest written constitutions in the world. It orRead more
The Indian Constitution is notable for several unique features that reflect its complexity and the diverse nature of the Indian polity. Here’s a discussion of its distinctive characteristics:
1. Length and Detail
The Indian Constitution is one of the longest written constitutions in the world. It originally contained 395 articles divided into 22 parts and 8 schedules. As of now, it has over 470 articles and 12 schedules, reflecting numerous amendments and expansions over time. The length of the Constitution is a result of its detailed and comprehensive nature, aiming to cover a wide range of issues, from fundamental rights and duties to the organization of government institutions and federal relations.
2. Rigidity and Flexibility
The Indian Constitution strikes a balance between rigidity and flexibility:
Rigidity: Certain provisions of the Constitution require a rigorous amendment process, which involves not only the approval of the Parliament but also, in some cases, the ratification by a majority of state legislatures. This rigidity ensures that fundamental aspects of the Constitution remain stable and less prone to frequent changes. Examples of such provisions include the federal structure and the rights of the states.
Flexibility: On the other hand, many provisions of the Constitution can be amended by a simple majority of the Parliament, or by a special majority without the need for state ratification. This flexibility allows for adaptation and modernization of the Constitution in response to changing social, economic, and political conditions. For instance, amendments related to administrative details or procedural aspects often fall into this category.
3. Written Constitution
The Indian Constitution is a written document, which is in contrast to some other countries like the United Kingdom, which have an unwritten or uncodified constitution. The written nature of the Indian Constitution provides a clear and structured framework for governance and legal interpretation. It sets out the fundamental principles, rights, and procedures explicitly, reducing ambiguity and providing a tangible reference for legal and political matters.
4. Incorporation of Both Written and Unwritten Conventions
While the Constitution itself is written, India’s constitutional framework incorporates unwritten conventions and practices that have evolved over time:
Written Elements: These include the detailed articles and schedules outlining the structure of government, fundamental rights, directive principles, and the process of amendments.
Unwritten Conventions: These are practices and traditions that have developed over time but are not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution. For example:
The Role of the Prime Minister: Although the Constitution provides for a parliamentary system, the specific powers and functions of the Prime Minister have evolved through conventions.
Judicial Review: The principle of judicial review, although not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution, is a well-established practice in India, developed through judicial interpretation.
Governor’s Role: The role of the Governor in the states, particularly in terms of discretion and intervention, is guided by conventions and practices rather than explicit constitutional provisions.
5. Federal Structure with Unitary Bias
The Indian Constitution establishes a federal structure of government, with a division of powers between the central and state governments. However, it has a unitary bias, meaning that in times of emergency, the central government can assume greater powers, and the Union can override state laws. This design is intended to maintain national unity and integrity while also providing a degree of autonomy to states.
6. Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles
The Constitution includes a detailed set of Fundamental Rights, which are justiciable and enforceable in courts, ensuring protection against arbitrary actions by the state. It also incorporates Directive Principles of State Policy, which, although not justiciable, serve as guiding principles for the creation of laws and policies aimed at promoting social and economic welfare.
In summary, the Indian Constitution is a complex and dynamic document that combines detailed written provisions with flexible mechanisms for adaptation. Its blend of rigidity and flexibility, along with the incorporation of both written and unwritten conventions, reflects its role in addressing the diverse needs of a large and pluralistic democracy like India.
See less
The 42nd Amendment Act of 1976, often referred to as the "mini-Constitution," significantly altered the Indian Constitution. It was enacted during the Emergency period (1975-1977) and introduced extensive changes that impacted the balance of power between the central and state governments. One of thRead more
The 42nd Amendment Act of 1976, often referred to as the “mini-Constitution,” significantly altered the Indian Constitution. It was enacted during the Emergency period (1975-1977) and introduced extensive changes that impacted the balance of power between the central and state governments.
One of the most critical changes was the shift towards centralization. The amendment curtailed the powers of the states, enhancing the authority of the central government. It did so by transferring five subjects from the State List to the Concurrent List, including education, forests, and the administration of justice. This allowed the central government to legislate on these matters, thereby diminishing state autonomy.
Furthermore, the amendment reinforced the central government’s control over state governments by empowering the President to declare a national emergency on the grounds of “internal disturbance,” a term that was later replaced with “armed rebellion” by the 44th Amendment in 1978. This provision increased the central government’s ability to impose its will on states during emergencies.
Additionally, the amendment introduced changes that curtailed the judiciary’s power to review and invalidate laws passed by Parliament, thereby reducing judicial checks on central legislative authority.
Overall, the 42nd Amendment Act tilted the federal balance significantly in favor of the central government, eroding the federal structure envisaged by the original Constitution.
See less