What is the significance of Article 32 of the Indian Constitution, often referred to as the “heart and soul” of the Indian Constitution, in ensuring the enforcement of fundamental rights and the protection of citizens’ constitutional remedies?
The Right to Information (RTI) Act, crucial for transparency and accountability, is increasingly becoming ineffective, often termed a "dead letter." Delays and Backlog: Significant delays in appointing Information Commissioners have led to a backlog of cases. For instance, the Central Information CoRead more
The Right to Information (RTI) Act, crucial for transparency and accountability, is increasingly becoming ineffective, often termed a “dead letter.”
Delays and Backlog: Significant delays in appointing Information Commissioners have led to a backlog of cases. For instance, the Central Information Commission (CIC) faced a backlog of over 36,000 cases in 2020.
RTI Amendment Act, 2019: This amendment gave the central government control over the tenure and salaries of Information Commissioners, undermining their autonomy and effectiveness.
Increased Rejections: Public authorities are increasingly rejecting RTI requests on vague grounds, with information on political funding and public projects often withheld.
Harassment of Activists: RTI activists face threats and violence, discouraging citizens from using the RTI Act. Notable cases include the murders of activists like Amit Jethwa and Satish Shetty.
Non-Compliance by Authorities: Many government departments fail to proactively disclose information as mandated, forcing citizens to file RTI requests.
Judicial Limitations: Some judicial rulings, like the Supreme Court’s decision in CBSE v. Aditya Bandopadhyay (2011), have limited the scope of the RTI Act.
These issues undermine the RTI Act’s effectiveness, diminishing its role in promoting transparency and accountability.
See less
.
.
See less