Home/Indian Constitution/Features of Indian Constitution/Page 3
Features of Indian Constitution
The Constitution of India is renowned for its comprehensive and progressive features. Key aspects include its federal structure, with a balance of power between the center and states, and a multi-party parliamentary system of governance.
The amendment process is rigorous, ensuring stability while allowing for necessary changes. Further, the Constitution mandates universal adult suffrage, guaranteeing the right to vote for all citizens.
Share
Impact of co-habitation on Parliamentary form of Government
Co-habitation in a parliamentary form of government refers to a situation where the head of state and the head of government come from opposing political parties. This typically occurs in semi-presidential systems, where a president (head of state) and a prime minister (head of government) must coexRead more
Co-habitation in a parliamentary form of government refers to a situation where the head of state and the head of government come from opposing political parties. This typically occurs in semi-presidential systems, where a president (head of state) and a prime minister (head of government) must coexist and share power despite their differing political affiliations.
Co-habitation can impact the smooth functioning of the parliamentary system in several ways. It often leads to political gridlock and policy stagnation, as the president and prime minister may have conflicting agendas and priorities. This can result in difficulties in passing legislation and implementing policies effectively. Additionally, co-habitation can create tension and power struggles within the government, undermining cooperation and unity.
However, it can also foster compromise and negotiation, encouraging diverse viewpoints and broader representation. Ultimately, the success of co-habitation depends on the willingness of both parties to work together for the country’s benefit.
See lessJudiciary
Enhancing the Indian judiciary machine, frequently criticized for delays and complicated approaches, requires a multi-faceted approach. Key strategies consist of: 1.Digitization and generation Integration: imposing e-courts and digital case management structures can streamline approaches, reduce papRead more
Enhancing the Indian judiciary machine, frequently criticized for delays and complicated approaches, requires a multi-faceted approach. Key strategies consist of:
1.Digitization and generation Integration: imposing e-courts and digital case management structures can streamline approaches, reduce paperwork, and enhance transparency. virtual hearings, already adopted in the course of the pandemic, need to be extended.
2. Growing Judicial potential: Appointing extra judges and establishing additional courts, mainly at the decrease degrees, can assist manage the caseload efficaciously. Specialised speedy-tune courts for precise kinds of instances, like the ones concerning women and children, also can expedite proceedings.
3. Judicial Reforms and schooling: non-stop training and ability building for judges and court docket team of workers in modern-day judicial practices and era can improve efficiency. Judicial responsibility mechanisms can make sure well timed delivery of judgments.
4. Alternative Dispute decision (ADR): selling ADR mechanisms like arbitration, mediation, and conciliation can reduce the load on courts. these methods offer faster, fee-powerful resolutions, especially for civil and commercial disputes.
5. Simplification of strategies: Reforming procedural legal guidelines to put off needless complexities and delays is important. This includes lowering adjournments and making sure stricter timelines for case disposal.
Enforcing these measures can assist create a greater green, obvious, and responsive judicial device in India.
See lessJudiciary
Improving the Indian Judiciary System: 1. Technology Integration: Implementing digital case management systems and e-filing to streamline processes and reduce paperwork. Examples like the National Judicial Data Grid (NJDG) for case information accessibility and virtual court hearings during the COVIRead more
Improving the Indian Judiciary System:
1. Technology Integration:
Implementing digital case management systems and e-filing to streamline processes and reduce paperwork.
Examples like the National Judicial Data Grid (NJDG) for case information accessibility and virtual court hearings during the COVID-19 pandemic showcase the benefits of technology integration.
2. Fast-Track Courts and Specialized Tribunals:
Establishing more fast-track courts to expedite the resolution of pending cases, especially those involving vulnerable groups like women, children, and senior citizens.
Specialized tribunals for specific areas like environmental issues (NGT) and commercial disputes (NCLT) have shown effectiveness in handling complex cases efficiently.
3. Judicial Reforms and Structural Changes:
Implementing judicial reforms to address the backlog of cases and improve the efficiency of the judiciary.
Examples include the Malimath Committee recommendations for criminal justice reforms and the Law Commission’s suggestions for judicial accountability.
4. Strengthening Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Mechanisms:
Promoting mediation, arbitration, and conciliation as alternative methods for resolving disputes outside the traditional court system.
Initiatives like the commercial courts for speedy resolution of commercial disputes and Lok Adalats for amicable settlements demonstrate the effectiveness of ADR mechanisms.
5. Capacity Building and Infrastructure Development:
Enhancing the infrastructure of courts and legal institutions to support the efficient functioning of the judiciary.
Recent initiatives such as the construction of new court complexes, digitization of records, and training programs for judicial officers contribute to capacity building and infrastructure development.
6. Transparency and Accountability:
Promoting transparency in judicial proceedings and decisions to enhance public trust in the judiciary.
Measures like live streaming of court proceedings, public access to judgments through websites, and the Right to Information Act contribute to accountability and transparency in the judicial system.
7. Judicial Appointments and Vacancies:
Addressing the issue of judicial vacancies by expediting the appointment process to ensure a full strength of judges in courts.
See lessReforms in the collegium system, timely filling of vacancies, and ensuring diversity in appointments are essential for a robust and efficient judiciary.
By implementing these reforms and strategies, the Indian judiciary system can address the challenges of delays and procedural complexities, ultimately enhancing access to justice, efficiency, and trust in the legal system.
Economic Growth vs. Environmental Protection in Developing Countries
The relevance of aestheticism in E.W. Hornung's A.J. Raffles series is primarily manifested through the character of Raffles himself and the thematic exploration of art, beauty, and the pursuit of sensual pleasures. Raffles as an Aesthetic Figure: Raffles, the gentleman thief protagonist of the seriRead more
The relevance of aestheticism in E.W. Hornung’s A.J. Raffles series is primarily manifested through the character of Raffles himself and the thematic exploration of art, beauty, and the pursuit of sensual pleasures.
- Raffles as an Aesthetic Figure:
- Raffles, the gentleman thief protagonist of the series, is depicted as a cultivated and refined individual who values aesthetics and the finer things in life.
- His appreciation for art, music, and fine living is a central aspect of his character, reflecting the principles of the aesthetic movement that emerged in the late 19th century.
- Raffles’ attention to detail, his love of beautiful objects, and his pursuit of sensual experiences align him with the aesthetic ideals of “art for art’s sake” and the emphasis on the intrinsic value of beauty.
- The Aesthetics of Crime:
- Hornung’s portrayal of Raffles’ criminal activities often highlights the aesthetic dimension of his thefts and burglaries.
- Raffles approaches his criminal exploits with a sense of artistry, meticulously planning and executing his heists in a way that showcases his skill and appreciation for the beauty of the objects he steals.
- The series explores the notion of the “aesthetics of crime,” where Raffles’ criminal actions are imbued with a certain elegance and refinement, challenging traditional moral boundaries.
- The Tension between Aestheticism and Morality:
- The Raffles series often presents a tension between Raffles’ aesthetic sensibilities and the moral implications of his criminal activities.
- Hornung’s portrayal of Raffles as a likable and charming protagonist creates a sympathetic figure, despite his transgressions, inviting readers to engage with the complexities of ethical considerations.
- This tension reflects the broader debates within the aesthetic movement, where the pursuit of beauty and sensual pleasures was sometimes seen as conflicting with traditional moral values.
- The Influence of Oscar Wilde’s Aestheticism:
- Hornung’s depiction of Raffles and the thematic exploration of aestheticism in the series can be seen as influenced by the ideas and writings of Oscar Wilde, a prominent figure in the aesthetic movement.
- Wilde’s emphasis on the primacy of art and beauty over moral considerations is reflected in the Raffles series, where Raffles’ criminal activities are often justified or romanticized through his appreciation for the aesthetic qualities of his targets.
See lessHow does the parliament of India ensure the accountability of the executive?
The Parliament of India ensures the accountability of the executive branch (which includes the President, the Council of Ministers with the Prime Minister at the head, and various ministries) through several mechanisms: 1. Question Hour: Members of Parliament (MPs) can ask questions of minisRead more
The Parliament of India ensures the accountability of the executive branch (which includes the President, the Council of Ministers with the Prime Minister at the head, and various ministries) through several mechanisms:
1. Question Hour: Members of Parliament (MPs) can ask questions of ministers, who are obliged to answer. This allows MPs to seek information about the functioning of the government, policies, and decisions.
2. Parliamentary Committees: These committees are constituted by Parliament to examine specific matters in detail, including the functioning of ministries and departments. They can summon ministers and officials for questioning and provide recommendations.
3. Debates and Discussions: Parliamentary sessions include debates on bills, policies, and other matters. Ministers are expected to participate in these debates, defend their policies, and respond to criticisms.
4. Budget Sessions: The annual budget is presented in Parliament by the Finance Minister. This provides an opportunity for MPs to scrutinize government expenditures and revenue plans.
5. No-confidence Motions: MPs can bring a no-confidence motion against the government. If passed, it indicates that the majority of Parliament no longer has confidence in the government, potentially leading to its resignation.
6. Legislative Oversight: Parliament enacts laws and oversees their implementation. It can amend existing laws or repeal them, holding the executive accountable for enforcing legislation.
7. Public Accounts Committee (PAC): This committee examines the audit reports of the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India. It scrutinizes government expenditures and reports findings to Parliament.
8. CAG Reports: The reports of the CAG, an independent body, are examined by Parliament. These reports highlight irregularities, inefficiencies, or potential financial misconduct within the government, ensuring transparency and accountability.
9. Judicial Review: While not directly under Parliament’s purview, the judiciary can review the actions of the executive to ensure they comply with constitutional provisions and laws passed by Parliament.
These mechanisms collectively ensure that the executive branch remains accountable to Parliament, which represents the interests of the people and exercises oversight over the government’s actions and policies.
See lessDiscuss the relevance of the concept of judicial review in the Indian constitutional framework. How does it safeguard the Constitution?
Judicial review, in the simplest sense, is the power of the judiciary to review and determine the validity of the laws passed by the legislature in such a way that it does not conflict with the Constitution. The concept has been borrowed from the U.S. Constitution and is one of the basic structuresRead more
Judicial review, in the simplest sense, is the power of the judiciary to review and determine the validity of the laws passed by the legislature in such a way that it does not conflict with the Constitution. The concept has been borrowed from the U.S. Constitution and is one of the basic structures of the Indian Constitution.
According to Article 13(2), the Union shall not make any law that takes away or bridges any fundamental rights and any law made in contravention of the aforementioned mandate shall, to the extent be void. From this article the main functions of Judicial review can be summarised as:
Further, it also safeguards the constitution of India by assessing the constitutionality of the government’s actions, thereby preventing unconstitutional laws and actions. It protects fundamental rights, allowing courts to nullify any law or action that infringes individual liberties. The Supreme Court’s Basic Structure Doctrine, established in Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973), ensures that certain core constitutional features remain unaltered, even by amendments. Judicial review also prevents abuse of power by promoting accountability and transparency in governance and upholding the rule of law.
See lessExamine the role of the President of India as envisaged in the Indian Constitution. How does the President's position balance ceremonial duties with actual powers?
The President of India is the head of state and the supreme commander of the Indian Armed Forces. The powers and functions of the President are outlined in the Constitution. The President's role is largely ceremonial, but certain powers and functions are significant in the functioning of the IndianRead more
The President of India is the head of state and the supreme commander of the Indian Armed Forces. The powers and functions of the President are outlined in the Constitution. The President’s role is largely ceremonial, but certain powers and functions are significant in the functioning of the Indian government.
Executive Powers:
Financial Powers:
Military Powers:
Judicial Powers:
Emergency Powers:
Guardian of the Constitution:
Conclusion
The President holds a pivotal position, embodying both the ceremonial essence of national unity and the constitutional duty of safeguarding democratic principles. Through a careful balance of executive, legislative, diplomatic, military, and emergency powers, the President plays a crucial role in upholding the democratic fabric of the nation.
See lessDiscuss the relevance of the concept of judicial review in the Indian constitutional framework. How does it safeguard the Constitution?
Judicial review is a crucial part of the Indian Constitution, allowing the judiciary to act as a check on the government's legislative and executive branches. It ensures that the government functions within the limits set by the Constitution and that the rights of citizens are protected. Judicial reRead more
Judicial review in India is the power of the Supreme Court and High Courts to examine and invalidate laws or executive actions that are inconsistent with the Constitution. It’s a key part of the separation of powers, ensuring that the Constitution is supreme and that the legislature and executive branches follow its principles.
Protects fundamental rights
Judicial review safeguards the fundamental rights of citizens by ensuring they aren’t violated by the government or other authorities.
Maintains checks and balances
It acts as a check on the powers of the legislature and executive, preventing misuse of power , etc.
The Supreme Court and High Courts can strike down laws or executive actions that they find unconstitutional or beyond the powers granted by the Constitution. They can also issue orders, instructions, and writs.
See lessCooperative Federalism entails dispute redressal. Discuss the role of Interstate Council in resolution of states related disputes and the challenges associated.
Role of Interstate Council in Dispute Resolution The Interstate Council plays a crucial role in fostering cooperative federalism by facilitating the resolution of disputes between states. It serves as a platform for dialogue and collaboration, allowing states to discuss and negotiate their differencRead more
Role of Interstate Council in Dispute Resolution
The Interstate Council plays a crucial role in fostering cooperative federalism by facilitating the resolution of disputes between states. It serves as a platform for dialogue and collaboration, allowing states to discuss and negotiate their differences amicably. The ISC conducts meetings where representatives from various states come together to address common concerns and conflicts. By providing a structured forum, the ISC encourages states to seek mutual agreements and solutions, reducing the need for prolonged legal battles. The ISC also assists in harmonizing policies across states, promoting uniformity and cooperation.
Challenges in Dispute Resolution
Despite its pivotal role, the ISC faces several challenges in effectively resolving state-related disputes. One challenge is the lack of mandatory enforcement power; the ISC can only recommend solutions, which states may choose to ignore. Political differences and regional interests hinder consensus-building, making it difficult to achieve lasting resolutions. The ISC’s infrequent meetings and limited resources impedes its ability to address disputes promptly and comprehensively. Ensuring equal representation and addressing power imbalances between states further complicates the ISC’s efforts to mediate conflicts effectively. Strengthening the ISC’s authority and enhancing its operational capabilities are essential to overcoming these challenges.
See lessDiscuss the linguistic reorganization of states
The British divided India into provinces in a way that disrupted linguistic and cultural balances. Since the 1920s, nationalist congress leaders have wanted to reorganise provinces based on language. At the 1920 Nagpur session of the Indian National Congress, they agreed to this idea. However, afterRead more
The British divided India into provinces in a way that disrupted linguistic and cultural balances. Since the 1920s, nationalist congress leaders have wanted to reorganise provinces based on language. At the 1920 Nagpur session of the Indian National Congress, they agreed to this idea. However, after India gained independence in 1947, the new leaders, including the Constituent Assembly, hesitated to this idea of linguistic reorganisation of the state. Historian Bipin Chandra says at the time of Independence the leaders felt that national unity was their top priority.
The push for linguistic reorganisation came back with the demand for a separate Andhra state. This led to the creation of Andhra Pradesh in October 1953, the first state reorganised based on language after independence. The States Reorganisation Committee (SRC) supported this principle and in 1955 recommended redrawing state boundaries based on language, while also considering administrative and economic factors and national unity. The States Reorganisation Act, passed in November 1956, created 14 states and 6 centrally administered territories. This was followed by the division of Bombay State into Gujarat for Gujarati speakers and Maharashtra for Marathi speakers.
You may further read “Interrogating Reorganisation of States: Culture, Identity, and Politics in India” by Asha Sarangi and Sudha Pai.
See less