Roadmap for Answer Writing Introduction Briefly introduce the concept of the right to privacy and its significance in the context of Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. Mention the landmark Puttaswamy judgment (2017) that recognized privacy as a fundamental right. Right to Privacy as ...
Impact of the Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSPs) in Promoting Social, Economic, and Political Justice Introduction The Directive Principles of State Policy, enshrined in Part IV of the Indian Constitution, serve as guiding principles for the State in the formulation and implementation of pRead more
Impact of the Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSPs) in Promoting Social, Economic, and Political Justice
Introduction
The Directive Principles of State Policy, enshrined in Part IV of the Indian Constitution, serve as guiding principles for the State in the formulation and implementation of policies aimed at achieving social, economic, and political justice. While these principles are non-justiciable and do not confer legal rights, they provide a framework for ensuring the well-being of citizens and shaping the direction of public policy.
Impact of Directive Principles
- Guiding Policy Formulation:
- Social Justice: DPSPs advocate for the promotion of social welfare and the reduction of inequalities. For example, the Directive Principles encourage the State to ensure adequate means of livelihood for all citizens and to promote the welfare of women and children.
- Economic Justice: Principles such as the fair distribution of wealth and the equitable distribution of resources are aimed at reducing economic disparities. The Directive Principles guide policies related to land reforms, rural development, and poverty alleviation.
- Recent Examples of Implementation:
- Right to Education Act, 2009: Reflecting the Directive Principle under Article 45, this act mandates free and compulsory education for children aged 6 to 14 years, aiming to promote educational equity and social upliftment.
- Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), 2005: This act aligns with the Directive Principle of providing adequate means of livelihood and promoting rural development by guaranteeing 100 days of wage employment to rural households.
- Social and Economic Policies:
- National Food Security Act, 2013: This act is in line with the Directive Principle of ensuring that the State secures a minimum standard of nutrition for all citizens, particularly the poor and vulnerable.
- Ayushman Bharat Scheme, 2018: Aimed at providing health insurance coverage to economically weaker sections, this scheme reflects the Directive Principle of promoting the welfare of the people and improving public health.
Implementation and Challenges
- Extent of Implementation:
- Partial Implementation: While several policies and programs align with the DPSPs, implementation often remains partial or inconsistent. For instance, despite numerous policies aimed at reducing poverty and inequality, significant disparities persist in income and living standards across different regions.
- Institutional Framework: The effectiveness of DPSPs depends on the strength of institutions and the political will to prioritize social and economic justice. Programs such as Public Distribution Systems (PDS) have faced challenges in implementation due to issues like corruption and inefficiency.
- Challenges in Realization:
- Resource Constraints: Adequate financial and administrative resources are essential for implementing the principles effectively. Budgetary constraints and inadequate allocation often limit the scope and impact of welfare programs.
- Political Will and Governance: The effectiveness of DPSPs is influenced by political priorities and governance structures. Policy implementation can be hampered by changes in government priorities or lack of continuity in policies.
Relationship with Fundamental Rights
- Complementary Nature:
- Mutual Reinforcement: The DPSPs and Fundamental Rights are complementary. While Fundamental Rights ensure individual freedoms and protection from the State, DPSPs provide a broader vision for social and economic justice that informs policy-making. For instance, the Right to Work, as embodied in DPSPs, complements the Right to Equality by advocating for fair labor practices and employment opportunities.
- Judicial Interpretation:
- Balancing Act: The judiciary often balances Fundamental Rights with DPSPs to ensure that while individual rights are protected, the State also pursues the broader goals of social justice and economic equality. In Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India (1980), the Supreme Court emphasized the balance between Fundamental Rights and DPSPs, reinforcing the principle that DPSPs should guide the implementation of rights.
- Constitutional Amendments and Reforms:
- Integration with Fundamental Rights: Amendments and reforms often seek to align DPSPs with Fundamental Rights. For example, the 40th Amendment Act, 1976, incorporated socio-economic objectives into the Constitution, emphasizing the integration of DPSPs with Fundamental Rights.
Conclusion
The Directive Principles of State Policy play a crucial role in guiding the State’s efforts to promote social, economic, and political justice. While these principles provide a vision for welfare and equitable development, their effective implementation is often challenged by resource constraints, governance issues, and political priorities. The relationship between DPSPs and Fundamental Rights is one of mutual reinforcement, where DPSPs guide policy formulation and implementation, complementing the protective framework of Fundamental Rights. Continuous efforts are needed to bridge the gap between constitutional ideals and practical realities, ensuring that the principles of justice and equality are realized for all citizens.
See less
Model Answer Introduction The right to privacy is a fundamental aspect of life and personal liberty, as established by the Supreme Court of India in the landmark case of Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017). This case affirmed that privacy is intrinsic to Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, whichRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
The right to privacy is a fundamental aspect of life and personal liberty, as established by the Supreme Court of India in the landmark case of Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017). This case affirmed that privacy is intrinsic to Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, which guarantees the right to life and personal liberty. The Court unanimously recognized that privacy is essential for the enjoyment of various other fundamental rights, including autonomy over personal decisions and protection against arbitrary state actions.
Right to Privacy as Intrinsic to Life and Personal Liberty under Article 21
Law Relating to DNA Testing of Child in the Womb to Establish Paternity
Balancing Right to Privacy with Other Interests
The conflict between the right to privacy and the need for DNA testing in paternity cases highlights the complexities involved. Courts must carefully evaluate each case, ensuring that privacy is only compromised when legally justified. For instance, in the case of Rohit Shekhar vs. Narayan Dutt Tiwari, the need for biological truth through DNA testing was weighed against privacy concerns . Judicial oversight is crucial to maintain this balance, ensuring that the dignity of all parties involved is preserved.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while the right to privacy is a fundamental right under Article 21, the legal framework surrounding DNA testing for paternity must navigate the delicate balance between individual privacy and the child’s right to know their biological parentage.
See less