Analyse the impact of the ‘Green India Mission’ under the National Action Plan on Climate Change (NAPCC). How effective has it been in enhancing carbon sequestration and restoring ecosystems?
The question of whether the NEET (National Eligibility cum Entrance Test) exam should have an age or number of attempt limit is a matter of debate, with valid arguments on both sides. Here are some perspectives: Arguments for Age/Attempt Limit: 1. Focused Preparation: Limits can encourage stuRead more
The question of whether the NEET (National Eligibility cum Entrance Test) exam should have an age or number of attempt limit is a matter of debate, with valid arguments on both sides. Here are some perspectives:
Arguments for Age/Attempt Limit:
1. Focused Preparation: Limits can encourage students to prepare more diligently within a specified timeframe, reducing the tendency to repeatedly attempt the exam without a structured plan.
2. Equity and Fairness: Limiting attempts can level the playing field, ensuring that all candidates have similar opportunities and resources to secure a seat.
3. Efficient Use of Resources: Implementing limits can help in the better allocation of educational resources and reduce the strain on the examination system.
Arguments Against Age/Attempt Limit:
1. Personal Circumstances: Students may face various personal or health-related issues that could affect their performance in certain years, and having limits might unfairly disadvantage them.
2. Late Bloomers: Some students may need more time to mature academically or may realize their medical aspirations later, and limiting attempts or imposing age restrictions could prevent capable candidates from entering the field.
3. Encouraging Persistence: Allowing unlimited attempts can encourage students to persevere and improve their knowledge and skills over time, which can be valuable traits for future medical professionals.
Conclusion:
Deciding whether to impose age or attempt limits on the NEET exam involves balancing the need for fairness and efficiency with the desire to accommodate diverse student circumstances and encourage perseverance. Any policy changes would need careful consideration of these factors and consultation with educational experts, students, and stakeholders.
See less
Impact of the Green India Mission under NAPCC Introduction Green India Mission which started in 2014 through the National Action Plan on Climate Change (NAPCC) works to improve ecosystem functions and forest recovery and boost carbon storage. The climate mitigation strategy of India benefits stronglRead more
Impact of the Green India Mission under NAPCC
Introduction
Green India Mission which started in 2014 through the National Action Plan on Climate Change (NAPCC) works to improve ecosystem functions and forest recovery and boost carbon storage. The climate mitigation strategy of India benefits strongly from GIM because it works to restore 5 million hectares (Mha) of degraded land and improve existing forests.
GIM demonstrates two key environmental benefits of enhancing the carbon storage capacity while simultaneously restoring ecosystems.
1. Carbon Sequestration
Through activities involving tree plantation and afforestation GIM enables the development of carbon sinks.
Development of forest and tree resources recorded a 2,261 sq. km expansion according to the Indian State of Forest Report (ISFR 2021) which attributes this growth to forest expansion projects.
The implementation of afforestation has been sluggish since 2023 because only 1.6 Mha of land was afforested against originally intended targets.
2. Ecosystem Restoration
Through eco-restoration of biodiversity-habitats GIM has dedicated itself to preserve natural ecosystems in disrupted terrain as well as wetlands and grasslands.
Watershed management programs together with better livelihood opportunities for forest-based communities run through initiatives operated in Madhya Pradesh and Karnataka.
The delay in funding distribution and implementation setbacks have slowed down massive restoration activities.
Effectiveness and Challenges
Forest governance received a positive improvement through the process of increased awareness as well as enhanced community participation.
The program faces funding challenges because authorities only release less than half of their budgeted funds and execution proceeds at a slow pace yet it encounters resistance from mining operations and construction developments.
Conclusion
See lessThe limitations of the GIm project for carbon storage and ecological preservation exist because of insufficient funds and bureaucracy in executing its plans. The complete implementation of GIM in climate change battles requires improved budgetary support and effective monitoring systems and assemblies that deploy conservation practices through local communities.