Model Answer Introduction The Indus Water Treaty (IWT) is a crucial bilateral agreement signed between India and Pakistan in 1960, aimed at regulating the sharing of waters from the Indus River and its tributaries. This treaty delineates the allocation of river waters and governs the construction ofRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
The Indus Water Treaty (IWT) is a crucial bilateral agreement signed between India and Pakistan in 1960, aimed at regulating the sharing of waters from the Indus River and its tributaries. This treaty delineates the allocation of river waters and governs the construction of dams and other water-related infrastructure.
Division of River Waters
The IWT grants India control over the eastern rivers (Beas, Ravi, and Sutlej) while Pakistan has rights to the western rivers (Indus, Jhelum, and Chenab). This division was designed to ensure fair access to water resources for both nations.
Ecological Implications
The treaty has significant ecological consequences, particularly for Pakistan. Increased dam construction by India has led to reduced water flow downstream, causing habitat degradation, loss of biodiversity, and declining fish populations in Pakistani rivers.
Economic Implications
Economically, the IWT has facilitated the development of hydroelectric power projects in India, enhancing its electricity generation capacity. However, disputes over water sharing have arisen, impeding economic growth and development in both countries. For example, Pakistan has faced challenges in agricultural productivity due to inconsistent water supply.
Political Implications
The IWT has been a pivotal element in India-Pakistan relations. While it has provided a framework for managing water resources, it has also been a source of tension. Recent geopolitical tensions, particularly following events like the Pulwama attack in 2019, have raised concerns about the treaty’s sustainability, as calls for revising or abrogating it have emerged.
Conclusion
The Indus Water Treaty remains vital for managing the Indus River system and mitigating conflicts between India and Pakistan. However, its ecological, economic, and political ramifications must be addressed to ensure sustainable development and equitable resource sharing in the region.
See less
Model Answer Introduction The interlinking of rivers in India aims to connect water-scarce and water-surplus regions, addressing issues of drought, floods, and navigation. While it presents several advantages, it also raises significant concerns that merit critical examination. Pros of InterlinkingRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
The interlinking of rivers in India aims to connect water-scarce and water-surplus regions, addressing issues of drought, floods, and navigation. While it presents several advantages, it also raises significant concerns that merit critical examination.
Pros of Interlinking Rivers
Improved Water Management
River interlinking can enhance water resource management, reducing scarcity in drought-prone areas. An example is the Ken-Betwa river interlinking project in Madhya Pradesh, which aims to transfer water from the Ken river basin to the Betwa basin, thereby providing irrigation to farmers in water-scarce regions.
Hydroelectric Power
Interlinked rivers can facilitate hydropower generation, contributing to renewable energy sources. The Damanganga-Pinjal river interlinking project is expected to generate approximately 1,775 MW of hydropower, enhancing energy security in Maharashtra and Gujarat.
Agriculture and Navigation
These projects can also significantly boost agricultural productivity by providing irrigation to vast areas. The Godavari-Cauvery river interlinking project aims to irrigate over 35 million hectares, improving crop yields. Additionally, river interlinking can enhance navigability, promoting inland water transportation, as seen with the proposed National Waterway 4, which connects the Godavari and Krishna rivers.
Cons of Interlinking Rivers
Environmental Concerns
River interlinking can lead to ecological disruptions, including biodiversity loss and wetland degradation. The Ken-Betwa project may submerge about 4,000 hectares of forest land, threatening the Panna Tiger Reserve.
Economic and Social Displacement
Such projects require substantial investment, often leading to cost overruns. The Godavari-Cauvery project has an estimated cost exceeding Rs. 60,000 crore (Source: Planning Commission). Moreover, displacement of communities is a serious concern; the Damanganga-Pinjal project could displace approximately 11,000 people, disrupting their livelihoods.
Inter-State Conflicts
Interlinking may exacerbate tensions between states over water allocation. The Ken-Betwa project has faced opposition from Uttar Pradesh due to concerns about equitable water distribution.
Conclusion
The interlinking of rivers presents a multifaceted dilemma. While it offers solutions for improved water management, hydroelectric power generation, and enhanced agriculture and navigation, the associated environmental risks, economic burdens, social displacements, and potential for inter-state conflicts must be carefully evaluated. A balanced approach is essential to ensure that benefits do not come at the cost of ecological and social stability.
See less