Sign Up

Have an account?

Sign In

Don't have account,

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.


Have an account?

Sorry, you do not have permission to ask a question, You must login to ask a question.

Need An Account,

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Search
Ask A Question

Probity in Governance

Share
Followers
17 Answers
276 Questions
Home/Ethics/Probity in Governance/Page 7

Mains Answer Writing Latest Questions

Team
  • 0
TeamSupreme
Asked: August 26, 2024In:
  • 0

Give a brief explanation of the fundamental principles that civil workers must uphold. (200 Words) [UPPSC 2020]

uppsc: challenges of corruption
  1. Pulkit Kohli
    Pulkit Kohli Begginer

    Examining the Statement on Bribery in Government Services 1. Analysis of the Statement: The statement suggests that if people stop offering bribes, the issue of bribery in government services will be resolved. While this perspective highlights the role of external influences in perpetuating corruptiRead more

    Examining the Statement on Bribery in Government Services

    1. Analysis of the Statement: The statement suggests that if people stop offering bribes, the issue of bribery in government services will be resolved. While this perspective highlights the role of external influences in perpetuating corruption, it oversimplifies the problem by not addressing the root causes and systemic factors contributing to bribery.

    2. Critical Examination:

    • Systemic and Institutional Factors: Bribery often stems from systemic weaknesses within institutions, such as lack of transparency, inadequate enforcement of anti-corruption laws, and bureaucratic inefficiencies. For instance, the CVC (Central Vigilance Commission) in India has identified institutional flaws as key contributors to corruption, indicating that simply stopping bribes without addressing these systemic issues may not be effective.
    • Demand and Supply Dynamics: While reducing the supply of bribes is important, the demand side also needs to be addressed. Government officials who accept bribes may be motivated by low salaries, job insecurity, or personal greed. For example, the Tihar Jail corruption case highlighted how both demand (officials accepting bribes) and supply (people offering bribes) perpetuate corruption.
    • Public Awareness and Ethical Culture: Combating bribery requires a cultural shift towards ethical behavior and public awareness. Initiatives like the India Against Corruption movement emphasize the importance of creating a culture of integrity and accountability among both public servants and citizens.
    • Legal and Structural Reforms: Effective solutions include strengthening legal frameworks, enhancing transparency, and implementing robust monitoring systems. The implementation of the RTI Act (Right to Information) has been a step towards increasing transparency and reducing opportunities for corruption.

    3. Conclusion: The statement overlooks the complexity of bribery, which involves both supply and demand factors. Addressing the problem requires a comprehensive approach involving systemic reforms, public education, and strengthening institutional integrity. Simply stopping the offer of bribes is not sufficient without tackling the underlying causes and creating a robust anti-corruption framework.

    See less
Team
  • 0
TeamSupreme
Asked: August 24, 2024In:
  • 0

A whistleblower faces serious risks, including physical harm and victimization from vested interests, accused individuals, and his team, when they report corruption and illegal acts, wrongdoing, and misconduct to the relevant authorities. What legislative changes would you recommend to fortify ...

upsc: challenges of corruption
  1. Team
    Best Answer
    Team Supreme

    Model Answer Introduction Whistleblowers play a vital role in exposing corruption, illegal activities, and misconduct within organizations. However, they often face significant risks, including physical harm and victimization by those they expose. To safeguard these individuals, robust protection meRead more

    Model Answer

    Introduction

    Whistleblowers play a vital role in exposing corruption, illegal activities, and misconduct within organizations. However, they often face significant risks, including physical harm and victimization by those they expose. To safeguard these individuals, robust protection mechanisms must be established.

    Body

    1. Clear Legal Framework

    A comprehensive legal framework is essential to protect whistleblowers from retaliation and discrimination. The Whistleblower Protection Act of 2014 should be effectively implemented, ensuring that individuals reporting wrongdoing are shielded from adverse actions (Government of India, 2014).

    2. Anonymity

    Providing whistleblowers with the option to remain anonymous is crucial. Anonymity can significantly reduce the risk of retaliation and ensure that individuals feel safe when reporting misconduct.

    3. Protection Against Retaliation

    Legal provisions must explicitly protect whistleblowers from retaliation, including termination, demotion, or harassment. Such protections should be enforced rigorously to create a safe environment for reporting (Transparency International, 2021).

    4. Support and Compensation

    Whistleblowers should receive financial compensation and legal assistance for any harm they suffer due to their disclosures. Support services, including counseling, should also be made available to help them cope with the aftermath of their actions.

    5. Awareness Campaigns

    Regular awareness campaigns can educate employees about the importance of whistleblowing and the protections available to them. These campaigns should highlight the positive impact of whistleblowing on organizational integrity.

    6. Confidentiality

    It is imperative to maintain the confidentiality of whistleblowers and the information they provide. This measure ensures their safety and encourages more individuals to come forward.

    7. Independent Body

    Establishing an independent body to investigate complaints made by whistleblowers can enhance accountability. This body should have the authority to take appropriate actions against those accused of wrongdoing.

    8. Training

    Regular training for employees on identifying and reporting misconduct is essential. Training should also include guidance on how to protect themselves from retaliation if they choose to blow the whistle.

    Conclusion

    Strengthening protection mechanisms for whistleblowers is crucial for promoting transparency and accountability in organizations. By implementing these measures, societies can foster an environment where individuals feel safe to report unethical practices without fear of retribution.

    See less
Team
  • 0
TeamSupreme
Asked: August 24, 2024In:
  • 0

Knowing what to consider and what to ignore is the essence of wisdom. In the bureaucracy, it is not unusual for an officer to become preoccupied with the peripheral and neglect the important matters at hand. Do you also think ...

upsc: quality of service delivery
  1. Team
    Best Answer
    Team Supreme

    Model Answer Introduction Wisdom lies in discerning what to prioritize and what to overlook. In bureaucratic settings, the effectiveness of an officer’s focus on peripheral matters versus core issues can significantly influence outcomes. While attention to detail is essential, an excessive focus onRead more

    Model Answer

    Introduction

    Wisdom lies in discerning what to prioritize and what to overlook. In bureaucratic settings, the effectiveness of an officer’s focus on peripheral matters versus core issues can significantly influence outcomes. While attention to detail is essential, an excessive focus on minor issues at the expense of critical ones can hinder effective service delivery and good governance.

    Body

    In bureaucratic contexts, an officer’s fixation on peripheral matters often leads to detrimental outcomes. For instance, consider a government official preoccupied with the formatting of reports while neglecting fundamental resource shortages essential for project implementation. This misplaced focus can result in project failures, ultimately affecting service delivery (Source: OECD Report on Public Governance).

    A pertinent example arises in public health scenarios. If a public health officer prioritizes regulatory compliance over addressing the underlying causes of a health crisis—such as inadequate sanitation or lack of healthcare access—the crisis continues unabated, illustrating a travesty of justice in governance (Source: World Health Organization).

    Conversely, officers who effectively distinguish between peripheral and core issues can enhance decision-making. For example, a police officer who recognizes that a minor traffic violation is a symptom of a larger community conflict can address the root causes rather than merely enforcing the law superficially. This approach leads to more effective outcomes, demonstrating the importance of prioritizing core issues (Source: Community Policing Reports).

    Conclusion

    While attention to peripheral issues is necessary, it is crucial for bureaucratic officers to prioritize core issues. Ignoring these foundational concerns leads to a travesty of justice, hindering effective service delivery and good governance. A balanced focus enables better resource allocation and fosters outcomes that truly serve the public interest.

    See less
Team
  • 0
TeamSupreme
Asked: August 24, 2024In:
  • 0

Talk about how the “Right to Information” contributes to governance openness. (125 Words) [UPPSC 2020]

uppsc: transparency in government: right to information citizen’s charters
  1. Hana Fernandes
    Hana Fernandes Learner

    Role of 'Right to Information' (RTI) for Transparency in Governance Overview The Right to Information (RTI) Act, enacted in 2005, is a pivotal legislation aimed at enhancing transparency and accountability in governance. It empowers citizens to seek information from public authorities, thereby promoRead more

    Role of ‘Right to Information’ (RTI) for Transparency in Governance

    Overview The Right to Information (RTI) Act, enacted in 2005, is a pivotal legislation aimed at enhancing transparency and accountability in governance. It empowers citizens to seek information from public authorities, thereby promoting openness in government operations.

    Role in Transparency

    • Empowerment: RTI empowers citizens by providing access to government documents and decisions, fostering an informed public.
    • Accountability: It compels public officials to be accountable for their actions and decisions, reducing corruption and malpractices.
    • Example: The RTI Act was instrumental in exposing the 2013 Coal Scam, where revelations of irregularities in coal block allocations led to significant administrative reforms and policy changes.

    Recent Example In 2020, the Delhi High Court upheld the RTI application seeking information about COVID-19 vaccine procurement, highlighting RTI’s role in ensuring transparency in critical public health matters.

    Conclusion RTI is essential for ensuring transparent governance by making government actions more accessible to the public, thus reinforcing accountability and reducing corruption.

    See less
Team
  • 0
TeamSupreme
Asked: August 24, 2024In:
  • 0

“Corruption is protected by the need for government approval before dishonest officials may be prosecuted.” Analyze the assertion. (125 Words) [UPPSC 2020]

uppsc: challenges of corruption
  1. Malti devi
    Malti devi Learner

    Requirement of Government Sanction and Corruption 1. Protective Shield: The need for government sanction to prosecute dishonest officials often acts as a barrier to addressing corruption. This requirement can be exploited to delay or block investigations. For example, in the case of Vijay Mallya, deRead more

    Requirement of Government Sanction and Corruption

    1. Protective Shield: The need for government sanction to prosecute dishonest officials often acts as a barrier to addressing corruption. This requirement can be exploited to delay or block investigations. For example, in the case of Vijay Mallya, delays in sanctioning prosecution have been criticized for allowing financial misconduct to persist.

    2. Bureaucratic Hurdles: Obtaining sanction involves bureaucratic procedures that can be manipulated. Recent instances, such as allegations against former Delhi Chief Secretary Anshu Prakash, highlight how such processes can obstruct timely justice.

    3. Accountability Issues: The requirement can undermine accountability, allowing corrupt officials to escape consequences. In the Securities Scam of 1992, delays in sanctioning prosecution affected the speed of legal proceedings.

    Conclusion: While the sanction process aims to prevent misuse of authority, it often becomes a protective shield for corruption, delaying justice and undermining accountability.

    See less
Team
  • 0
TeamSupreme
Asked: August 23, 2024In:
  • 0

Roadmap for Answer Writing Introduction Define probity and its significance in governance and socio-economic development. Briefly state how probity encompasses honesty, integrity, and ethical conduct. Body Role of Probity in Governance: Trust and Credibility: Explain how probity builds trust in government institutions. Example: Successful implementation of the Aadhaar ...

upsc: probity in governance
  1. Team
    Best Answer
    Team Supreme

    Model Answer Introduction Probity embodies absolute honesty, integrity, and moral uprightness in actions, reflecting adherence to high ethical standards. A clear example of probity is a financial auditor refusing a bribe and reporting irregularities during an audit, emphasizing the necessity of inteRead more

    Model Answer

    Introduction

    Probity embodies absolute honesty, integrity, and moral uprightness in actions, reflecting adherence to high ethical standards. A clear example of probity is a financial auditor refusing a bribe and reporting irregularities during an audit, emphasizing the necessity of integrity in governance.

    Role of Probity in Governance

    Trust and Credibility

    Probity is fundamental in building trust and confidence in government institutions. The successful implementation of the Aadhaar system in India illustrates how unwavering honesty and integrity can enhance public confidence in governance.

    Transparency and Accountability

    Probity fosters transparency in government operations, ensuring accountability among public servants. This openness serves as a deterrent against corruption and unethical behavior, promoting a culture of responsibility.

    Effective Resource Utilization

    Probity ensures the efficient allocation of public resources based on merit and need. For instance, New Zealand’s transparent budgeting process prioritizes projects that deliver clear social and economic benefits.

    Promoting Stability and Unity

    Governments characterized by probity can reduce social unrest and foster unity among diverse societal segments, contributing to overall political stability. Denmark’s governance model is a prime example of this principle in action.

    Role of Probity in Socio-Economic Development

    Attracting Investment

    Probity attracts both domestic and foreign investments, assuring investors that their resources are protected from corruption. Singapore’s stringent anti-corruption measures have positioned it as a leading destination for foreign investment.

    Equitable Distribution of Resources

    Probity ensures resources are allocated to benefit society as a whole, promoting balanced development, which is evident in the policies of Nordic countries.

    Promoting Fair Competition

    Probity prevents corrupt practices, fostering a level playing field in markets. The United States’ strict enforcement of anti-monopoly laws exemplifies how integrity can lead to economic growth.

    Human Capital Development

    Emphasizing merit and skills through probity in education and employment practices is essential for sustained socio-economic progress. Germany’s vocational training system highlights this principle.

    Community Harmony

    Probity in governance ensures public resources are utilized for the collective good, nurturing social stability. Switzerland’s high levels of probity contribute to strong community cohesion and overall societal stability.

    Conclusion

    In conclusion, as nations strive for growth and stability, prioritizing probity is pivotal. It fosters a society where honesty, integrity, and ethical conduct serve as guiding principles for a prosperous future, ultimately leading to effective governance and socio-economic advancement.

    See less
Team
  • 0
TeamSupreme
Asked: August 23, 2024In:
  • 0

Roadmap for Answer Writing 1. Introduction Objective: Set the stage by defining coercion and undue influence in a work environment. Content: Mention the negative ...

upsc: work culture
  1. Team
    Best Answer
    Team Supreme

    Model Answer Introduction In the workplace, both coercion and undue influence are tactics used to control or manipulate employees, but they differ in methods. Coercion relies on threats or force, while undue influence manipulates employees through trust and authority. These unethical behaviours leadRead more

    Model Answer

    Introduction

    In the workplace, both coercion and undue influence are tactics used to control or manipulate employees, but they differ in methods. Coercion relies on threats or force, while undue influence manipulates employees through trust and authority. These unethical behaviours lead to an unhealthy work environment, fostering mistrust and poor communication. For instance, a manager coercing staff into working unpaid overtime or subtly manipulating them for personal benefit both erode workplace ethics.

    Key Differences: Coercion vs. Undue Influence in the Work Environment

    Definition

    • Coercion: Involves forcing someone to act involuntarily using threats, pressure, or intimidation.
    • Undue Influence: A more subtle form of manipulation where power and trust are misused to sway decisions.

    Characteristics

    • Coercion: Often involves overt threats and shows a clear imbalance of power.
    • Undue Influence: Involves psychological manipulation, typically exploiting authority or personal relationships.

    Legal Aspect

    • Coercion: Generally covered under harassment laws, and may involve illegal actions.
    • Undue Influence: May not be explicitly illegal but violates workplace ethics and abuse of power regulations.

    Manifestation

    • Coercion: Can be seen as bullying, harassment, or workplace violence.
    • Undue Influence: Appears as subtle persuasion or misuse of authority to gain advantages.

    Impact

    • Coercion: Results in a hostile work environment, affecting mental health.
    • Undue Influence: Causes stress, leading employees to feel manipulated or pressured.

    Ethical Concerns

    • Coercion: A direct violation of individual autonomy and consent.
    • Undue Influence: Undermines autonomy through subtle manipulation, raising ethical issues.

    Examples

    • Coercion: Threatening employees with termination unless they work unpaid overtime.
    • Undue Influence: A manager implying that personal favors will lead to better performance reviews.

    Conclusion

    The distinction between coercion and undue influence is essential for maintaining a healthy workplace. Implementing strong ethical policies, offering whistleblower protection, and promoting leadership development are critical to preventing such abuses. By doing so, organizations can foster environments built on trust and integrity.

    See less
Team
  • 0
TeamSupreme
Asked: August 23, 2024In:
  • 0

Is it possible to provide quality service delivery under the current administrative structure without changing the work culture? Provide arguments in response. (200 Words) [UPPSC 2021]

uppsc: work culture
  1. Saara Patwardhan
    Saara Patwardhan Begginer

    Change in Work-Culture for Quality Service Delivery **1. Enhanced Efficiency: A modern work culture promotes efficiency through streamlined processes and technology integration. For example, the adoption of e-Governance platforms in India, such as the Digital India initiative, has improved service dRead more

    Change in Work-Culture for Quality Service Delivery

    **1. Enhanced Efficiency: A modern work culture promotes efficiency through streamlined processes and technology integration. For example, the adoption of e-Governance platforms in India, such as the Digital India initiative, has improved service delivery by reducing paperwork and speeding up administrative procedures.

    **2. Employee Empowerment: A shift towards a more collaborative and empowering work culture can lead to higher employee satisfaction and productivity. Initiatives like the Mission Karmayogi program, which focuses on capacity building and professional development of civil servants, illustrate how empowering employees can enhance service quality and responsiveness.

    **3. Customer-Centric Approach: A change towards a customer-centric work culture ensures that the needs and feedback of citizens are prioritized. The PM-GAY (Pradhan Mantri Gramin Awaas Yojana) scheme has benefited from a focus on citizen feedback and participatory governance, leading to better implementation and service delivery.

    **4. Adaptability and Innovation: Modern work cultures encourage adaptability and innovation, which are crucial for addressing evolving public needs. For example, the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in government services, such as AI-based chatbots for public inquiries, represents a move towards leveraging technology to improve service efficiency.

    Conclusion: Adapting the work culture within the administrative structure is essential for enhancing service delivery. Embracing efficiency, employee empowerment, customer-centricity, and innovation can lead to more responsive and effective governance. As public expectations evolve, so must the work culture to meet these demands effectively.

    See less
Team
  • 0
TeamSupreme
Asked: August 23, 2024In:
  • 0

“One kind of corruption is when a public servant neglects their duties.” Do you concur with this assertion? Give a rational explanation.(200 Words) [UPPSC 2023]

uppsc: challenges of corruption
  1. Lakshya Mathur
    Lakshya Mathur Begginer

    Non-Performance of Duty as a Type of Corruption 1. Definition of Non-Performance of Duty Non-Performance of Duty: This refers to the failure or negligence of a public servant to carry out their responsibilities effectively and diligently. Example: An officer neglecting their duty to address public gRead more

    Non-Performance of Duty as a Type of Corruption

    1. Definition of Non-Performance of Duty

    • Non-Performance of Duty: This refers to the failure or negligence of a public servant to carry out their responsibilities effectively and diligently.
    • Example: An officer neglecting their duty to address public grievances or process applications in a timely manner exemplifies non-performance. This behavior undermines the efficacy of public services and erodes public trust.

    2. Corruption and Non-Performance

    • Corruption: Corruption involves abuse of power for personal gain, which can manifest in various forms such as bribery, embezzlement, or negligence of duty.
    • Link to Non-Performance: Non-performance of duty can be viewed as a form of corruption because it often involves neglecting responsibilities to serve personal interests or due to indifference. For instance, if a public servant deliberately delays processes to solicit bribes, their non-performance directly aligns with corrupt practices.

    3. Examples of Non-Performance Leading to Corruption

    • Revenue Department Scandals: In several states, officials have been found guilty of non-performance by delaying land records and permits to extract bribes from applicants. This negligence creates opportunities for corruption and exploitation.
    • Health Sector: During the COVID-19 pandemic, certain officials were found guilty of non-performance by not implementing protocols effectively, leading to mishandling of resources and inefficiencies, which contributed to greater health crises and public distrust.

    4. Impact on Governance

    • Erosion of Trust: Non-performance undermines the effectiveness of governance and damages public trust. It often leads to inefficiency, service delays, and injustice for the public.

    In conclusion, non-performance of duty can be considered a type of corruption as it compromises the integrity of public service and can often be linked to the abuse of power or negligence for personal gain. Effective accountability and performance measures are crucial to combating this form of corruption.

    See less
Load More Questions

Resources & Suggestions

Mains Answer Writing Latest Articles

On: February 24, 2025

Daily Answer Writing Practice Questions (24 February 2025)

The rise of the work-from-home culture has brought about several ethical issues in private organizations. In this context, do you believe it is ethical for an employee to engage in moonlighting? Discuss. (Answer in 150 words) घर से काम करने ...

On: February 22, 2025 Comments: 0

Indo-US Relation: Areas of Cooperation & Conflicts

Key Areas: Defense, technology, trade, energy, and regional cooperation. Key Areas of Cooperation 1. Defense and Security Transition from buyer-seller to co-production and technology sharing. India as a Major Defense Partner (MDP) and inclusion in STA-1. Access to advanced technologies, ...

On: February 22, 2025 Comments: 0

भारत-अमेरिका संबंध: सहयोग और संघर्ष के क्षेत्र

मुख्य विषय: भारत-अमेरिका संबंधों की मजबूती, विशेषकर रक्षा, प्रौद्योगिकी और क्षेत्रीय सहयोग में प्रगति। सहयोग के प्रमुख क्षेत्र 1. रक्षा एवं सुरक्षा सहयोग भारत और अमेरिका के बीच रक्षा संबंधों का विस्तार। प्रमुख रक्षा साझेदार (MDP) का दर्जा और STA-1 ...

Explore Our Blog