Probity in Governance
Share
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Law and ethics are considered to be the two tools for controlling human conduct so as to make it conducive to civilized social existence.
Law and Ethics as Tools for Controlling Human Conduct 1. Role of Law: Explanation: Law serves as a formal mechanism for regulating human behavior through codified rules and regulations enforced by legal institutions. It provides clear guidelines and penalties to maintain order and protect individualRead more
Law and Ethics as Tools for Controlling Human Conduct
1. Role of Law:
2. Role of Ethics:
3. Complementary Nature:
4. Recent Developments:
Conclusion: Law and ethics are complementary tools for controlling human conduct. Law provides formal regulations and enforcement mechanisms, while ethics guide personal and societal values. Together, they support a framework for promoting a just, orderly, and ethical society.
See lessWhat do you understand by the terms 'governance', 'good governance' and 'ethical governance'?(150 words) [UPSC 2016]
Understanding Governance, Good Governance, and Ethical Governance 1. Governance: Definition: Governance refers to the processes, structures, and institutions through which authority and power are exercised and decisions are made to manage a country or organization. Example: Government administrationRead more
Understanding Governance, Good Governance, and Ethical Governance
1. Governance:
2. Good Governance:
3. Ethical Governance:
Conclusion: Governance encompasses the management of authority, good governance focuses on effective and fair administration, and ethical governance integrates moral principles into public administration, ensuring integrity and trust.
See less"It is said that government servants take bribe because people offer bribe to them. If people stop offering bribe, the problem of bribe will be solved." What is your opinion about the statement? Examine critically. (200 Words) [UPPSC 2020]
Examining the Statement on Bribery in Government Services 1. Analysis of the Statement: The statement suggests that if people stop offering bribes, the issue of bribery in government services will be resolved. While this perspective highlights the role of external influences in perpetuating corruptiRead more
Examining the Statement on Bribery in Government Services
1. Analysis of the Statement: The statement suggests that if people stop offering bribes, the issue of bribery in government services will be resolved. While this perspective highlights the role of external influences in perpetuating corruption, it oversimplifies the problem by not addressing the root causes and systemic factors contributing to bribery.
2. Critical Examination:
3. Conclusion: The statement overlooks the complexity of bribery, which involves both supply and demand factors. Addressing the problem requires a comprehensive approach involving systemic reforms, public education, and strengthening institutional integrity. Simply stopping the offer of bribes is not sufficient without tackling the underlying causes and creating a robust anti-corruption framework.
See lessWhat is the probity? Explain clearly the philosophical basis of probity in governance. (200 Words) [UPPSC 2020]
Understanding Probity and Its Philosophical Basis in Governance 1. What is Probity?: Probity refers to the adherence to ethical principles and integrity in professional conduct, ensuring transparency, honesty, and accountability. It is crucial for maintaining public trust in governance and upholdingRead more
Understanding Probity and Its Philosophical Basis in Governance
1. What is Probity?: Probity refers to the adherence to ethical principles and integrity in professional conduct, ensuring transparency, honesty, and accountability. It is crucial for maintaining public trust in governance and upholding the rule of law.
2. Philosophical Basis of Probity in Governance:
Probity in governance ensures that public officials act in the best interests of society, fostering a culture of transparency and accountability.
See less"The Right to Information Act is not all about citizens' empowerment alone, it essentially redefines the concept of accountability." Discuss. (150 words) [UPSC 2018]
The Right to Information Act and Accountability Redefining Accountability Citizens' Empowerment: While the Right to Information (RTI) Act empowers citizens by providing them access to information held by public authorities, its impact extends beyond individual empowerment. It fundamentally redefinesRead more
The Right to Information Act and Accountability
Redefining Accountability
Citizens’ Empowerment: While the Right to Information (RTI) Act empowers citizens by providing them access to information held by public authorities, its impact extends beyond individual empowerment. It fundamentally redefines accountability in governance.
Enhanced Transparency: The RTI Act mandates that government actions and decisions be transparent. This transparency compels public officials to be more accountable for their actions. Example: In recent years, RTI applications have uncovered issues like irregularities in public distribution systems and misuse of funds in various schemes, leading to corrective actions.
Systematic Oversight: The Act enables systematic oversight by allowing citizens to request information and hold public bodies accountable. It ensures that officials must justify their decisions and actions, fostering a culture of responsibility. Example: Investigations triggered by RTI queries have led to exposing corruption in construction projects and mismanagement in educational institutions.
Conclusion: The RTI Act not only empowers citizens but also redefines accountability by ensuring transparency, encouraging responsible governance, and facilitating public oversight.
See lessDistinguish between "Code of ethics" and "Code of conduct" with suitable examples. (150 words) [UPSC 2018]
Distinction Between "Code of Ethics" and "Code of Conduct" 1. Code of Ethics Definition: A Code of Ethics is a set of broad, overarching principles that guide the behavior and decision-making of individuals based on moral values and professional standards. It defines what is considered right and wroRead more
Distinction Between “Code of Ethics” and “Code of Conduct”
1. Code of Ethics
Definition: A Code of Ethics is a set of broad, overarching principles that guide the behavior and decision-making of individuals based on moral values and professional standards. It defines what is considered right and wrong in a professional context.
Example: The American Medical Association’s (AMA) Code of Ethics provides principles such as respect for patient autonomy, beneficence, and non-maleficence. It outlines the fundamental ethical obligations of physicians to ensure patient care is handled with integrity and compassion.
2. Code of Conduct
Definition: A Code of Conduct is a more detailed set of rules and guidelines that outline specific behaviors expected from individuals within an organization. It focuses on compliance with organizational policies and legal requirements.
Example: The Indian Administrative Service (IAS) Code of Conduct specifies detailed rules regarding officials’ conduct, including protocols for handling conflicts of interest, maintaining confidentiality, and guidelines for interactions with the public and colleagues.
Conclusion: While the Code of Ethics provides broad ethical principles guiding professional behavior, the Code of Conduct details specific behavioral expectations and operational rules within an organization.
See lessThere is a view that the Official Secrets Act is an obstacle to the implementation of Right to Information Act. Do you agree with the view? Discuss.(150 words) [UPSC 2019
Official Secrets Act and Right to Information Act Agreement with the View: **1. Official Secrets Act and Its Impact a. Purpose and Limitations: The Official Secrets Act (OSA) of 1923 aims to protect sensitive government information related to national security and public safety. It restricts the disRead more
Official Secrets Act and Right to Information Act
Agreement with the View:
**1. Official Secrets Act and Its Impact
a. Purpose and Limitations:
The Official Secrets Act (OSA) of 1923 aims to protect sensitive government information related to national security and public safety. It restricts the disclosure of information deemed confidential, which can conflict with the principles of transparency and accountability promoted by the Right to Information Act (RTI) 2005.
b. Obstacle to Transparency:
The OSA can limit the scope of information accessible under RTI, thereby hindering the public’s right to know. For instance, in 2020, the Delhi High Court found that certain information withheld under the OSA was not directly related to national security and should be disclosed under RTI.
**2. Discussion and Recent Examples
a. Balancing Act:
While the OSA is essential for safeguarding national interests, it sometimes conflicts with the RTI Act’s goals. For example, the RTI application seeking details on the Rafale aircraft deal faced delays and denials based on the OSA, raising concerns about its overreach.
b. Recent Case:
In 2021, the Supreme Court ruled that information about the appointment of officials under the OSA should be provided if it does not compromise national security, illustrating the need for a balanced approach between secrecy and transparency.
Conclusion:
See lessYes, the Official Secrets Act can act as an obstacle to the effective implementation of the Right to Information Act. Ensuring a balance between national security and transparency is crucial for maintaining public trust and accountability.
Explain the basic principles of citizens charter movement and bring out its importance.(150 words) [UPSC 2019]
Principles of the Citizens' Charter Movement Citizens' Charter is a concept aimed at enhancing public service delivery by setting clear standards of service and ensuring accountability in governance. The basic principles of this movement include: Transparency: Public services should clearly communicRead more
Principles of the Citizens’ Charter Movement
Citizens’ Charter is a concept aimed at enhancing public service delivery by setting clear standards of service and ensuring accountability in governance. The basic principles of this movement include:
Importance
The Citizens’ Charter movement is crucial as it:
Conclusion
The Citizens’ Charter movement, through its principles of transparency, accountability, participation, and redressal, plays a pivotal role in improving public service delivery and fostering trust between citizens and government.
See lessWhat do you understand by probity in governance? Based on your understanding of the term, suggest measures for ensuring probity in government.(150 words) [UPSC 2019]
Probity in Governance Definition: Probity in governance refers to the adherence to ethical principles, integrity, and transparency in public administration. It ensures that public officials act with honesty, accountability, and fairness, maintaining the trust of the public. Measures for Ensuring ProRead more
Probity in Governance
Definition: Probity in governance refers to the adherence to ethical principles, integrity, and transparency in public administration. It ensures that public officials act with honesty, accountability, and fairness, maintaining the trust of the public.
Measures for Ensuring Probity:
**1. Strengthening Transparency Mechanisms
a. Implementing E-Governance:
Adopting digital platforms for public services and procurement can reduce corruption and enhance transparency. For example, India’s e-GP (e-Procurement) system aims to streamline procurement processes and minimize fraud.
b. Public Disclosure:
Mandating the disclosure of assets and liabilities by public officials can deter unethical behavior. The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013 in India requires public officials to declare their assets and liabilities.
**2. Ensuring Accountability
a. Establishing Robust Audit Systems:
Regular audits by independent agencies can help identify and address irregularities. For instance, the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India plays a crucial role in auditing government expenditure.
b. Strengthening Anti-Corruption Bodies:
Empowering bodies like the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) to investigate and address corruption complaints can enhance accountability.
**3. Promoting Ethical Training
a. Conducting Regular Workshops:
Training programs for government employees on ethics, legal compliance, and integrity can foster a culture of probity. The Integrity Pact introduced by the CVC is an example of encouraging ethical conduct in procurement processes.
Ensuring probity in governance requires a combination of transparency, accountability, and continuous ethical education to uphold the principles of integrity and trust in public administration.
See lessEffective utilization of public funds is crucial to meet development goals. Critically examine the reasons for under-utilization and mis-utilization of public funds and their implications.(150 words) [UPSC 2019]
Effective Utilization of Public Funds: Issues and Implications **1. Reasons for Under-Utilization and Mis-Utilization a. Bureaucratic Inefficiency: Cumbersome administrative procedures and red tape often lead to delays in fund disbursement and execution of projects. For example, the delay in the impRead more
Effective Utilization of Public Funds: Issues and Implications
**1. Reasons for Under-Utilization and Mis-Utilization
a. Bureaucratic Inefficiency:
Cumbersome administrative procedures and red tape often lead to delays in fund disbursement and execution of projects. For example, the delay in the implementation of the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (NREGS) has been partly attributed to bureaucratic hurdles.
b. Corruption and Mismanagement:
Corruption and lack of accountability can result in funds being siphoned off or misused. A notable case is the 2020 PM CARES Fund controversy, where allegations of mismanagement and lack of transparency were raised regarding the allocation and use of funds.
c. Lack of Proper Planning and Monitoring:
Inadequate planning and oversight can lead to inefficient use of resources. For instance, the smart city projects in India have faced criticism for delays and cost overruns due to poor planning and monitoring.
**2. Implications
a. Stalled Development:
Under-utilization and mis-utilization of funds can impede progress on development projects, affecting infrastructure, health, and education. For example, delays in the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY) have led to slower progress in providing affordable housing.
b. Erosion of Public Trust:
Mismanagement of public funds erodes trust in government institutions and reduces public confidence in developmental programs, as seen in the criticism faced by several welfare schemes.
c. Economic Inefficiency:
Inefficient use of resources leads to wastage and economic inefficiency, ultimately affecting the overall development goals and hindering growth.
Addressing these issues requires streamlined administrative processes, stringent anti-corruption measures, and effective monitoring mechanisms to ensure that public funds are used efficiently to meet development objectives.
See less