एडवर्ड स्नोडन, एक कंप्यूटर विशेषज्ञ तथा सी.आई.ए. के पूर्व व्यवस्था प्रशासक, ने सरकार के निगरानी कार्यक्रमों के अस्तित्व के बारे में गोपनीय सरकारी दस्तावेज़ों का खुलासा प्रेस को कर दिया । अनेक विधि विशेषज्ञों और अमेरिकी सरकार के अनुसार, उसके ...
Model Answer Introduction The case involves Dr. X, a prominent medical practitioner planning to establish a super-speciality hospital through a charitable trust to serve a neglected region. However, an inspection by the tax investigation agency reveals both substantial tax irregularities and minor tRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
The case involves Dr. X, a prominent medical practitioner planning to establish a super-speciality hospital through a charitable trust to serve a neglected region. However, an inspection by the tax investigation agency reveals both substantial tax irregularities and minor technical defaults. The decision now is whether to prioritize substantial compliance and overlook minor defaults or to pursue strict action on all fronts.
Body
As the head of the tax investigation agency, I would opt for the first course of action: taking a broader view by ensuring substantial tax compliance and ignoring merely technical defaults. Here are my reasons:
1. Public Interest
The proposed hospital would significantly benefit the community by improving access to healthcare for all sections of society. Supporting this initiative aligns with the agency’s commitment to public welfare.
2. Resource Allocation
Focusing on technical defaults that do not affect overall tax collection would waste valuable resources. Instead, we should direct our efforts towards addressing substantial compliance issues that have a meaningful impact.
3. Compliance Cooperation
Dr. X’s willingness to pay the substantial tax demonstrates a positive attitude towards compliance. Recognizing this cooperation can foster a better relationship between the agency and taxpayers.
4. Proportional Response
The agency’s response should match the severity of non-compliance. Addressing significant irregularities should take precedence over minor technicalities, which can be rectified through guidance rather than punishment.
5. Promoting Social Welfare and Economic Growth
Supporting the hospital not only enhances healthcare but also stimulates local economic growth by creating jobs and attracting investment.
6. Mitigating Negative Consequences
Pursuing technical defaults may delay the hospital project, causing unnecessary burdens. By focusing on substantial compliance, we can facilitate timely completion and community benefits.
7. Promoting Voluntary Compliance
Acknowledging Dr. X’s cooperation encourages a culture of voluntary compliance, motivating others to fulfill their tax obligations willingly.
Conclusion
In conclusion, prioritizing substantial tax compliance and supporting the establishment of the super-speciality hospital aligns with public interest and promotes community welfare. This balanced approach ensures that the agency’s efforts contribute positively to society while maintaining effective tax administration.
See less
स्नोडन का कार्य: कानूनी बनाम नैतिक दृष्टिकोण एडवर्ड स्नोडन ने अमेरिकी सरकार के निगरानी कार्यक्रमों की जानकारी सार्वजनिक की, जो गोपनीयता के उल्लंघन के आरोपों का सामना कर रहा है। इस संदर्भ में, दो प्रमुख दृष्टिकोण हैं: कानूनी और नैतिक। कानूनी दृष्टिकोण: गुप्तचर्या अधिनियम 1917: स्नोडन के कार्य को अमेरRead more
स्नोडन का कार्य: कानूनी बनाम नैतिक दृष्टिकोण
एडवर्ड स्नोडन ने अमेरिकी सरकार के निगरानी कार्यक्रमों की जानकारी सार्वजनिक की, जो गोपनीयता के उल्लंघन के आरोपों का सामना कर रहा है। इस संदर्भ में, दो प्रमुख दृष्टिकोण हैं: कानूनी और नैतिक।
कानूनी दृष्टिकोण:
नैतिक दृष्टिकोण:
परस्पर स्पर्धी मूल्य:
निष्कर्ष
नैतिकता की दृष्टि से उचित: स्नोडन का कार्य कानूनी दृष्टिकोण से प्रतिबंधित था, लेकिन नैतिक दृष्टिकोण से इसे उचित माना जा सकता है। उनका तर्क है कि समाज की पारदर्शिता और सार्वजनिक भलाई के लिए निगरानी कार्यक्रमों का खुलासा करना आवश्यक था। हालांकि, इस मुद्दे पर न्याय और कानूनी दायित्व को भी ध्यान में रखना जरूरी है, जिससे संतुलित दृष्टिकोण अपनाया जा सके।
See less