Ethics

Model Answer

Introduction

The case study involves ABC Ltd., a large transnational company planning to establish a new plant in Vikaspuri, an underdeveloped area. While the company’s expansion aligns with government policies aimed at regional development, it raises significant concerns about potential social and economic disruptions for local residents.

Stakeholders

Key stakeholders include ABC Ltd., the residents of Vikaspuri, the local government, and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). Each group has distinct interests that must be considered.

Body

(a) Issues Involved in the Case

1. Economic Development vs. Social Impact:
   • The establishment of the new plant presents a dilemma between fostering economic growth and the potential adverse social effects on the residents (World Bank, 2020).
2. Environmental Impact:
   • The new plant may lead to pollution and resource depletion, adversely affecting the health and quality of life for the local population (Environmental Protection Agency, 2021).
3. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR):
   • Although the company emphasizes its CSR policy to address local concerns, there is skepticism regarding the sufficiency and effectiveness of these initiatives (Harvard Business Review, 2019).
4. Protests and Legal Action:
   • The residents’ protests and their decision to approach the judiciary highlight their dissatisfaction and fear of losing their tranquil lifestyle due to the company’s operations.

(b) Suggestions to Address Concerns

1. Open Dialogue and Engagement:
   • ABC Ltd. should foster transparent communication with local residents, actively addressing their concerns and incorporating their feedback into operational plans.
2. Mitigation Measures:
   • Implement strategies to minimize negative impacts, such as investing in green technologies, providing local job opportunities, and addressing inflation through community infrastructure projects.
3. Collaboration with Government and NGOs:
   • Partnering with local government and NGOs can help ensure balanced development. Joint initiatives can focus on healthcare, education, and environmental preservation.
4. Compliance with Regulatory Requirements:
   • Adhering strictly to environmental and regulatory standards will help mitigate risks and demonstrate the company’s commitment to community welfare.
5. Long-term Engagement:
   • Establish ongoing CSR initiatives that extend beyond the plant’s launch, focusing on sustainable community development, education, and healthcare support.

Conclusion

By implementing these strategies, ABC Ltd. can effectively balance its expansion goals with the needs and concerns of the Vikaspuri community, fostering a mutually beneficial relationship that promotes sustainable growth and community well-being.

Model Answer

Introduction

As an officer in charge of a social service scheme aimed at supporting old and destitute women, I face a moral dilemma when an illiterate woman without proper documentation seeks assistance. While adhering to the rules is essential, denying her support would be cruel given her pitiable condition.

Body

(a) Rational Approach to Resolve the Dilemma

A rational way to resolve this dilemma involves adopting a compassionate yet flexible approach while adhering to the necessary rules. This approach includes conducting a thorough assessment of the woman’s situation and exploring alternative methods to verify her eligibility for the scheme.

(b) Reasons for This Approach

1. Case-by-Case Assessment:
   • Description: Conduct a detailed evaluation of the woman’s circumstances through home visits and interviews.
   • Justification: This allows for a comprehensive understanding of her living conditions and financial situation, highlighting the urgency of her need for support.
2. Collaboration with Local Authorities:
   • Description: Engage with community leaders, local authorities, and social workers familiar with her situation.
   • Justification: Their insights can provide essential testimonies that support her eligibility, adding credibility to her case.
3. Documentation Alternatives:
   • Description: Identify alternative ways to establish her eligibility, such as gathering affidavits or testimonies from credible neighbors or community members.
   • Justification: This enables the validation of her circumstances without formal documentation.
4. Involvement of NGOs and Senior Citizen Associations:
   • Description: Consult local NGOs or senior citizen associations that work with vulnerable populations.
   • Justification: These organizations may have established mechanisms to verify cases like hers and can guide the implementation of support.
5. Review and Oversight Mechanism:
   • Description: Establish a review process to evaluate exceptional cases.
   • Justification: This ensures transparency and accountability, preventing misuse of the scheme while allowing deserving individuals access to support.

Conclusion

By adopting this compassionate and flexible approach, the officer can balance adherence to rules with the pressing need to support the woman. This nuanced implementation of the social service scheme allows for humane consideration of individual circumstances, ultimately fostering a more equitable system.

Model Answer

Introduction

The displacement of marginalized communities for large-scale projects, such as mining and dams, often results in inadequate compensation and a loss of traditional lifestyles. This unjust distribution of costs favors industries and urban communities, while the displaced suffer. A robust compensation-cum-rehabilitation policy is essential to address these inequities.

Body

Key Elements of the Suggested Policy

1. Adequate and Timely Compensation:
   • Description: Ensure fair and prompt monetary compensation based on current market value and future earning potential.
   • Justification: Compensation must support livelihoods during the transition, preventing long-term financial hardship.
2. Skill Development and Employment Opportunities:
   • Description: Implement vocational training and education programs tailored to the needs of displaced communities.
   • Justification: Enhancing employability will help individuals secure sustainable livelihoods, reducing dependency on low-paid migrant work.
3. Alternative Livelihood Support:
   • Description: Promote agricultural initiatives, cottage industries, or community enterprises that align with local skills and resources.
   • Justification: This approach fosters self-reliance and economic independence for displaced persons.
4. Social Infrastructure Development:
   • Description: Invest in healthcare, education, and community centers in resettlement areas.
   • Justification: Ensuring access to essential services facilitates a smoother transition and improves quality of life.
5. Participatory Decision-Making:
   • Description: Involve affected communities in consultations about compensation and rehabilitation efforts.
   • Justification: Empowering communities ensures policies reflect their needs and aspirations, fostering a sense of ownership.
6. Environmental Conservation:
   • Description: Integrate eco-restoration and sustainable practices to mitigate environmental impacts.
   • Justification: Protecting the environment benefits both communities and ecosystems, promoting long-term sustainability.
7. Monitoring and Evaluation:
   • Description: Establish a mechanism to assess policy effectiveness and adapt as needed.
   • Justification: Regular evaluations ensure that the needs of displaced communities are continuously met.

Conclusion

By incorporating these elements into a comprehensive compensation-cum-rehabilitation policy, it is possible to address the unjust distribution of costs and benefits. This policy aims to empower displaced persons, enabling them to rebuild their lives with dignity and sustainability.