Should autonomous vehicles be programmed to make decisions that prioritize the lives of their passengers over pedestrians in unavoidable accident scenarios?
Model Answer In India, family-based learning often instills biases that shape children's perspectives, such as gender roles, career preferences, and socio-economic distinctions. Formal education can play a pivotal role in countering these biases and promoting independent thinking. 1. Diverse CurricuRead more
Model Answer
In India, family-based learning often instills biases that shape children’s perspectives, such as gender roles, career preferences, and socio-economic distinctions. Formal education can play a pivotal role in countering these biases and promoting independent thinking.
1. Diverse Curriculum
A diverse curriculum is essential for breaking family-centric biases. The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 promotes a “Multidisciplinary Holistic Education” approach, which encourages students to explore a wide range of subjects beyond traditional career paths. This allows students to develop broader perspectives and challenge biases, such as the preference for careers in IT and medicine over creative fields (NEP, 2020).
2. Emphasis on Critical Thinking
Formal education fosters critical thinking through classroom activities like debates, discussions, and problem-solving exercises. These activities encourage students to analyze information, question assumptions, and form independent views, thus reducing the influence of family-based biases (Source: NEP, 2020).
3. Inclusive Environment
By bringing together students from diverse socio-economic backgrounds, schools create an inclusive learning environment. The Right to Education Act (2009) mandates that 25% of seats in private schools be reserved for economically disadvantaged children, promoting equality and reducing socio-economic biases.
4. Interactive Learning
Experiential and hands-on learning methods, such as sports-integrated education, help students develop critical life skills like collaboration, self-discipline, and responsibility. These approaches encourage independent thinking and diminish the influence of family-based biases on a child’s worldview.
Through these measures, formal education can promote open-mindedness, challenge ingrained biases, and foster independent thinking.
See less
Programmers should not program autonomous vehicles to prioritize the lives of their passengers over other pedestrians in inevitable accident situations. Why- -Ethical Concerns: Prioritizing passengers is morally wrong. It is creating a system in which some lives are devalued compared to others, whicRead more
Programmers should not program autonomous vehicles to prioritize the lives of their passengers over other pedestrians in inevitable accident situations. Why-
-Ethical Concerns: Prioritizing passengers is morally wrong. It is creating a system in which some lives are devalued compared to others, which is a terrible and unjust concept.
-Societal Impact: Such a system would undermine public trust in autonomous vehicles. People would not want to use them if they knew they might be sacrificed in an accident. This could severely hinder the development and adoption of this potentially life-saving technology.
-Legal Ramifications: Programming vehicles to prioritize passengers could have severe legal consequences for manufacturers and developers. It could lead to lawsuits and potentially criminal charges.
-Alternative Solutions: In the absence of passenger safety as the guiding principle, self-driving cars would be programmed to:
1. Reduce damage as much as possible.
2. Avoid collisions through state-of-the-art sensors and predictive models.
-In the event that an accident cannot be avoided, the car would attempt to minimize damage as much as it can, independent of the persons’ identity.
The goal is to make totally safe, self-sufficient automobiles for everyone, not just passengers.
See less